@phdthesis{Iosip2024, author = {Iosip, Anda-Larisa}, title = {Molecular Mechanosensing Mechanisms of the Carnivorous Plant \(Dionaea\) \(muscipula\)}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-28764}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-287649}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Plants are able to sense mechanical forces in order to defend themselves against predators, for instance by synthesizing repellent compounds. Very few plants evolved extremely sensitive tactile abilities that allow them to perceive, interpret and respond by rapid movement in the milliseconds range. One such rarity is the charismatic Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) - a carnivorous plant which relies on its spectacular active trapping strategy to catch its prey. The snapping traps are equipped with touch-specialised trigger hairs, that upon bending elicit an action potential (AP). This electrical signal originates within the trigger hairs' mechanosensory cells and further propagates throughout the whole trap, alerting the plant of potential prey. Two APs triggered within thirty seconds will set off the trap and more than five APs will initiate the green stomach formation for prey decomposition and nutrient uptake. Neither the molecular components of the plant's AP nor the Venus flytrap's fast closure mechanism have been fully elucidated yet. Therefore, the general objective of this study is to expound on the molecular basis of touch perception: from AP initiation to trap closure and finally to stomach formation. The typical electrical signal in plants lasts for minutes and its shape is determined by the intensity of the mechanical force applied. In contrast, the Venus flytrap's one-second AP is of all-or-nothing type, similar in shape to the animal AP. In order to gain more insight into the molecular components that give rise to the Venus flytrap's emblematic AP, the transcriptomic landscape of its unique mechanotransducer - the trigger hair - was compared to the rest of the non-specialised tissues and organs. Additionally, the transcriptome of the electrically excitable fully-developed adult trap was compared to non-excitable juvenile traps that are unable to produce sharp APs. Together, the two strategies helped with the identification of electrogenic channels and pumps for each step of the AP as follows: (1) the most specific to the trigger hair was the mechanosensitive channel DmMSL10, making up the best candidate for the initial AP depolarization phase, (2) the K+ outward rectifier DmSKOR could be responsible for repolarisation, (3) further, the proton pump DmAHA4, might kick in during repolarisation and go on with hyperpolarisation and (4) the hyperpolarization- and acid-activated K+ inward rectifier KDM1 might contribute to the re-establishment of electrochemical gradient and the resting potential. Responsible for the AP-associated Ca2+ wave and electrical signal propagation, the glutamate-like receptor DmGLR3.6 was also enriched in the trigger hairs. Together, these findings suggest that the reuse of genes involved in electrical signalling in ordinary plants can give rise to the Venus flytrap's trademark AP. The Venus flytrap has been cultivated ever since its discovery, generating more than one hundred cultivars over the years. Among them, indistinguishable from a normal Venus flytrap at first sight, the 'ERROR' cultivar exhibits a peculiar behaviour: it is unable to snap its traps upon two APs. Nevertheless, it is still able to elicit normal APs. To get a better understanding of the key molecular mechanisms and pathways that are essential for a successful trap closure, the 'ERROR' mutant was compared to the functional wild type. Timelapse photography led to the observation that the 'ERROR' mutants were able to leisurely half close their traps when repeated mechanostimulation was applied (10 minutes after 20 APs, 0.03 Hz). As a result of touch or wounding in non-carnivorous plants, jasmonic acid (JA) is synthesized, alerting the plants of potential predators. Curiously, the JA levels were reduced upon mechanostimulation and completely impaired upon wounding in the 'ERROR' mutant. In search of genes accountable for the 'ERROR' mutant's defects, the transcriptomes of the two phenotypes were compared before and after mechanostimulation (1h after 10 APs, 0.01 Hz). The overall dampened response of the mutant compared to the wild type, was reflected at transcriptomic level as well. Only about 50\% of wild type's upregulated genes after touch stimulation were differentially expressed in 'ERROR' and they manifested only half of the wild type's expression amplitude. Among unresponsive functional categories of genes in 'ERROR' phenotype, there were: cell wall integrity surveilling system, auxin biosynthesis and stress-related transcription factors from the ethylene-responsive AP2/ERF and C2H2-ZF families. Deregulated Ca2+-decoding as well as redox-related elements together with JA-pathway components might also contribute to the malfunctioning of the 'ERROR' mutant. As the mutant does not undergo full stomach formation after mechanical treatment, these missing processes represent key milestones that might mediate growth-defence trade-offs under JA signalling. This confirms the idea that carnivory has evolved by recycling the already available molecular machineries of the ubiquitous plant immune system. To better understand the mutant's defect in the trap snapping mechanism, the ground states (unstimulated traps) of the two phenotypes were compared. In this case, many cell wall-related genes (e.g. expansins) were downregulated in the 'ERROR' mutant. For the first time, these data point to the importance of a special cell wall architecture of the trap, that might confer the mechanical properties needed for a functional buckling system - which amplifies the speed of the trap closure. This study provides candidate channels for each of the AP phases that give rise to and shape the sharp Venus flytrap-specific AP. It further underlines the possible contribution of the cell wall architecture to the metastable ready-to-snap configuration of the trap before stimulation - which might be crucial for the buckling-dependent snapping. And finally, it highlights molecular milestones linked to defence responses that ensure trap morphing into a green stomach after mechanostimulation. Altogether, these processes prove to be interdependent and essential for a successful carnivorous lifestyle.}, subject = {Venusfliegenfalle}, language = {en} }