@phdthesis{Biehl2014,
  author    = {Biehl, Stefanie},
  title     = {The Impact of Adult Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder, Methylphenidate, and the COMT Val158Met Polymorphism on Selective Attention and Working Memory},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-100959},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Theories of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) aetiology have placed a focus on impaired behavioural inhibition presumably leading to executive function (EF) deficits. Neuroimaging studies report neurophysiological findings consistent with these hypothesised impairments, and investigations of functional brain activation from a network perspective report hypoactivation in the frontoparietal network as well as hyperactivation in the dorsal attention network. Studies investigating the acute effects of stimulant medication on EF show an improvement on behavioural EF measures including working memory. In addition, methylphenidate (MPH) was shown to up-regulate the task-positive/ frontoparietal network in children and adolescents with ADHD. So far, there are only few studies investigating the impact of ADHD on behavioural and neurophysiological EF measures as well as the effect of several weeks of stimulant medication in adult patients. The importance of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) enzyme for subcortical and cortical dopaminergic and noradrenergic functioning furthermore led to studies investigating a potential interactive impact of COMT genotype and ADHD on neuropsychological functioning, with a particular focus on working memory. The results of these studies were very heterogeneous. In addition, as none of the studies compared the results of ADHD patients to those of a healthy control group, possible differential effects of COMT in patients and healthy controls could not be examined. The aim of this dissertation was to investigate selective attention properties of the central executive component during a working memory task and to transfer this task to fMRI. A third study then aimed to investigate the effects of adult ADHD (aADHD), MPH, and COMT genotype on working memory with a particular focus on activation of the task-positive network during the analysis of the fMRI data. The first study (EEG) could replicate and extend the results from previous research. This study could furthermore connect the overall activation in frontal areas to suppression efficiency in posterior visual areas as well as establish the impact of hyperactive/ impulsive ADHD symptoms on task performance. The second study (fMRI) allowed the successful transfer of the paradigm to fMRI, and the further replication and extension of previous findings. In addition, this study showed the sensitivity of the task to the effects of the COMT genotype. The third study (fMRI) was one of the first studies that exploratorily investigated the effects COMT in a sample of aADHD patients and a comparable healthy control group. This study showed an interactive effect of these two factors on neuropsychological measures as well as on fMRI activation during a classic n-back working memory task. In addition, this task led to more activation in the task-positive network of the aADHD group compared to a healthy control group in the absence of performance differences, pointing towards compensatory activation in the aADHD group. Furthermore, activation in the frontal cortex was increased in patients taking MPH compared to a placebo. The fMRI data from the selective attention task moreover showed decreased activation in the right DLPFC of the patient group, which was associated with reduced suppression efficiency across all participants. The clinical effect of MPH in the third study was visible but did not reach significance, which is probably attributable to a lack of experimental power. The studies in this dissertation could successfully replicate and extend previous findings. A goal for future studies should be the further investigation of the interactive effects of COMT genotype and aADHD on neuropsychological test results and fMRI activation, but also on medication response and adverse effects. In this context, the adaptation of a network perspective during the analysis of fMRI data seems to be the best way to detect existing between-group differences.},
  subject      = {Aufmerksamkeits-Defizit-Syndrom},
  language  = {en}
}