@article{SteinMarufMuelleretal.2021,
  author    = {Stein, Kiera and Maruf, Abdullah Al and M{\"u}ller, Daniel J. and Bishop, Jeffrey R. and Bousman, Chad A.},
  title     = {Serotonin transporter genetic variation and antidepressant response and tolerability: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
  series = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2075-4426},
  doi       = {10.3390/jpm11121334},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-252294},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Antidepressants are used to treat several psychiatric disorders; however, a large proportion of patients do not respond to their first antidepressant therapy and often experience adverse drug reactions (ADR). A common insertion-deletion polymorphism in the promoter region (5-HTTLPR) of the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) gene has been frequently investigated for its association with antidepressant outcomes. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess 5-HTTLPR associations with antidepressants: (1) response in psychiatric disorders other than major depressive disorder (MDD) and (2) tolerability across all psychiatric disorders. Literature searches were performed up to January 2021, yielding 82 studies that met inclusion criteria, and 16 of these studies were included in the meta-analyses. Carriers of the 5-HTTLPR LL or LS genotypes were more likely to respond to antidepressant therapy, compared to the SS carriers in the total and European ancestry-only study populations. Long (L) allele carriers taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) reported fewer ADRs relative to short/short (SS) carriers. European L carriers taking SSRIs had lower ADR rates than S carriers. These results suggest the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism may serve as a marker for antidepressant outcomes in psychiatric disorders and may be particularly relevant to SSRI treatment among individuals of European descent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EdelmannMusialBrightGelbrichetal.2016,
  author    = {Edelmann, Frank and Musial-Bright, Lindy and Gelbrich, Goetz and Trippel, Tobias and Radenovic, Sara and Wachter, Rolf and Inkrot, Simone and Loncar, Goran and Tahirovic, Elvis and Celic, Vera and Veskovic, Jovan and Zdravkovic, Marija and Lainscak, Mitja and Apostolović, Svetlana and Neskovic, Aleksandar N. and Pieske, Burkert and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk},
  title     = {Tolerability and feasibility of beta-blocker titration in HFpEF versus HFrEF: Insights from the CIBIS-ELD trial},
  series = {JACC: Heart Failure},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {JACC: Heart Failure},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.008},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191022},
  pages     = {140-149},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the tolerability and feasibility of titration of 2 distinctly acting beta-blockers (BB) in elderly heart failure patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. BACKGROUND: Broad evidence supports the use of BB in HFrEF, whereas the evidence for beta blockade in HFpEF is uncertain. METHODS: In the CIBIS-ELD (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly) trial, patients >65 years of age with HFrEF (n = 626) or HFpEF (n = 250) were randomized to bisoprolol or carvedilol. Both BB were up-titrated to the target or maximum tolerated dose. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were compared regarding tolerability and clinical effects (heart rate, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic functions, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute-walk distance, quality of life, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: For both of the BBs, tolerability and daily dose at 12 weeks were similar. HFpEF patients demonstrated higher rates of dose escalation delays and treatment-related side effects. Similar HR reductions were observed in both groups (HFpEF: 6.6 beats/min; HFrEF: 6.9 beats/min, p = NS), whereas greater improvement in NYHA functional class was observed in HFrEF (HFpEF: 23\% vs. HFrEF: 34\%, p < 0.001). Mean E/e' and left atrial volume index did not change in either group, although E/A increased in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: BB tolerability was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF. Relevant reductions of HR and blood pressure occurred in both groups. However, only HFrEF patients experienced considerable improvements in clinical parameters and Left ventricular function. Interestingly, beta-blockade had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function in either group. Long-term studies using modern diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are urgently needed to establish whether BB therapy exerts significant clinical benefit in HFpEF. (Comparison of Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in Elderly Heart Failure HF] Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind Multicentre Study CIBIS-ELD]; ISRCTN34827306).},
  language  = {en}
}