@article{SudarevicTroyaFuchsetal.2023,
  author    = {Sudarevic, Boban and Troya, Joel and Fuchs, Karl-Hermann and Hann, Alexander and Vereczkei, Andras and Meining, Alexander},
  title     = {Design and development of a flexible 3D-printed endoscopic grasping instrument},
  series = {Applied Sciences},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Applied Sciences},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2076-3417},
  doi       = {10.3390/app13095656},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319186},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: Interventional endoscopic procedures are growing more popular, requiring innovative instruments and novel techniques. Three-dimensional printing has demonstrated great potential for the rapid development of prototypes that can be used for the early assessment of various concepts. In this work, we present the development of a flexible endoscopic instrument and explore its potential benefits. (2) Methods: The properties of the instrument, such as its maneuverability, flexibility, and bending force, were evaluated in a series of bench tests. Additionally, the effectiveness of the instrument was evaluated in an ex vivo porcine model by medical experts, who graded its properties and performance. Furthermore, the time necessary to complete various interventional endoscopic tasks was recorded. (3) Results: The instrument achieved bending angles of ±216° while achieving a bending force of 7.85 (±0.53) Newtons. The time needed to reach the operating region was 120 s median, while it took 70 s median to insert an object in a cavity. Furthermore, it took 220 s median to insert the instrument and remove an object from the cavity. (4) Conclusions: This study presents the development of a flexible endoscopic instrument using three-dimensional printing technology and its evaluation. The instrument demonstrated high bending angles and forces, and superior properties compared to the current state of the art. Furthermore, it was able to complete various interventional endoscopic tasks in minimal time, thus potentially leading to the improved safety and effectiveness of interventional endoscopic procedures in the future.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StratosHellerRudert2022,
  author    = {Stratos, Ioannis and Heller, Karl-Dieter and Rudert, Maximilian},
  title     = {German surgeons' technical preferences for performing total hip arthroplasties: a survey from the National Endoprosthesis Society},
  series = {International Orthopaedics},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {International Orthopaedics},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00264-021-05188-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266350},
  pages     = {733-739},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose The goal of our study was to conduct an online survey that highlights patterns of practice during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods The survey was conducted in June and August 2020. Three hundred thirteen members of the German Society for Endoprosthesis participated in the survey. Results The anterolateral approach is by far the most popular approach used for primary total hip arthroplasty, followed by the anterior approach during minimally invasive (55\% for the anterolateral and 29\% for the anterior) and regular surgery (52\% for the anterolateral and 20\% for the anterior). Two-thirds of the orthopaedic surgeons do not use drainages during THA. Moreover, 80\% of the survey participants routinely apply tranexamic acid during surgery. Surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery for THA use more frequently fast-track-concepts for post-operative rehabilitation. According to the interviewees, the application of fast-track-concepts leads to reduced periods of hospital stay after THA. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that patterns of practice during THA in Germany are in line with the evidence provided by current literature. This study can be seen as a stimulus to conduct similar surveys in other countries in order to promote minimally invasive surgery for THA.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HottenrottSchlesingerHelmeretal.2020,
  author    = {Hottenrott, Sebastian and Schlesinger, Tobias and Helmer, Philipp and Meybohm, Patrick and Alkatout, Ibrahim and Kranke, Peter},
  title     = {Do small incisions need only minimal anesthesia? — anesthetic management in laparoscopic and robotic surgery},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm9124058},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-220039},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Laparoscopic techniques have established themselves as a major part of modern surgery. Their implementation in every surgical discipline has played a vital part in the reduction of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Precise robotic surgery, as an evolution of this, is shaping the present and future operating theatre that an anesthetist is facing. While incisions get smaller and the impact on the organism seems to dwindle, challenges for anesthetists do not lessen and could even become more demanding than in open procedures. This review focuses on the pathophysiological effects of contemporary laparoscopic and robotic procedures and summarizes anesthetic challenges and strategies for perioperative management.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeningHamoudaOezkuretal.2017,
  author    = {Bening, Constanze and Hamouda, Khaled and Oezkur, Mehmet and Schimmer, Christoph and Schade, Ina and Gorski, Armin and Aleksic, Ivan and Leyh, Rainer},
  title     = {Rapid deployment valve system shortens operative times for aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy},
  series = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
  number    = {27},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13019-017-0598-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-159439},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: There is growing evidence from the literature that right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement (RAT-AVR) improves clinical outcome. However, increased cross clamp time is the strongest argument for surgeons not performing RAT-AVR. Rapid deployment aortic valve systems have the potential to decrease cross-clamp time and ease this procedure. We assessed clinical outcome of rapid deployment and conventional valves through RAT. Methods: Sixty-eight patients (mean age 76 ± 6 years, 32\% females) underwent RAT-AVR between 9/2013 and 7/2015. According to the valve type implanted the patients were divided into two groups. In 43 patients (R-group; mean age 74.1 ± 6.6 years) a rapid deployment valve system (Edwards Intuity, Edwards Lifesciences Corp; Irvine, Calif) and in 25 patients (C-group; mean age 74.2 ± 6.6 years) a conventional stented biological aortic valve was implanted. Results: Aortic cross-clamp (42.1 ± 12 min vs. 68.3 ± 20.3 min; p < 0.001) and bypass time (80.4 ± 39.3 min vs. 106.6 ± 23.2 min; p = 0.001) were shorter in the rapid deployment group (R-group). We observed no differences in clinical outcome. Postoperative gradients (R-group: max gradient, 14.3 ± 8 mmHg vs. 15.5 ± 5 mmHg (C-group), mean gradient, 9.2 ± 1.7 mmHg (R-group) vs. 9.1 ± 2.3 mmHg (C-group) revealed no differences. However, larger prostheses were implanted in C-group (25 mm; IQR 23-27 mm vs. 23 mm; IQR 21-25; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the rapid deployment aortic valve system reduced cross clamp and bypass time in patients undergoing RAT-AVR with similar hemodynamics as with larger size stented prosthesis. However, larger studies and long-term follow-up are mandatory to confirm our findings.},
  language  = {en}
}