@article{LiangBencurovaPsotaetal.2021,
  author    = {Liang, Chunguang and Bencurova, Elena and Psota, Eric and Neurgaonkar, Priya and Prelog, Martina and Scheller, Carsten and Dandekar, Thomas},
  title     = {Population-predicted MHC class II epitope presentation of SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins correlates to the case fatality rates of COVID-19 in different countries},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {1422-0067},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms22052630},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258936},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {We observed substantial differences in predicted Major Histocompatibility Complex II (MHCII) epitope presentation of SARS-CoV-2 proteins for different populations but only minor differences in predicted MHCI epitope presentation. A comparison of this predicted epitope MHC-coverage revealed for the early phase of infection spread (till day 15 after reaching 128 observed infection cases) highly significant negative correlations with the case fatality rate. Specifically, this was observed in different populations for MHC class II presentation of the viral spike protein (p-value: 0.0733 for linear regression), the envelope protein (p-value: 0.023), and the membrane protein (p-value: 0.00053), indicating that the high case fatality rates of COVID-19 observed in some countries seem to be related with poor MHC class II presentation and hence weak adaptive immune response against these viral envelope proteins. Our results highlight the general importance of the SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins in immunological control in early infection spread looking at a global census in various countries and taking case fatality rate into account. Other factors such as health system and control measures become more important after the early spread. Our study should encourage further studies on MHCII alleles as potential risk factors in COVID-19 including assessment of local populations and specific allele distributions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Sitaru2003,
  author    = {Sitaru, Ana Gabriela},
  title     = {Modulation of the T cell response with MHC class I peptides and their analogues},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-4561},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Transplantation is now firmly established as a therapeutic approach to extend and improve the life of patients in the final stages of organ failure. It has been demonstrated that transplantation between genetically non-identical individuals leads to the activation of the recipient's alloimmune response as a major determinant of transplant outcome. T cell recognition of foreign MHC molecules plays a key role in initiating and sustaining allograft rejection. To prevent the risk of rejection, patients are given immunosuppressive drugs, which are non-specific and have major side-effects (infections, malignancies). It has been shown that the alloreactive T cells specifically recognize donor MHC-derived peptides. This implies that it may be possible to develop antigen-specific strategies in order to modulate the alloimmune response by peptide analogues and specifically altered peptide ligands. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of "recipient-adapted" analogues from the dominant MHC class I peptide to modulate the alloimmune response. Beside the significant role of donor dominant determinants in the rejection process, we tested seven 13-to-24-mer peptides from the Wistar-Furth MHC class I molecule (WF, RT1.Au) for their possible immunogenicity in a fully MHC-mismatched WF to Lewis (LEW, RT1l) rat strain combination. Secondly, the immunodominant allopeptide was selected to generate analogues in order to investigate their modulatory capacity. All peptides were tested in vitro in a standard proliferation assay and in vivo using a heterotopic heart transplantation model. Our findings show that five peptides (P1-P5) were able to induce specific T cell proliferation in LEW responders. Furthermore, we found a hierarchical distribution of the determinants: peptide P1 as a good candidate for the immunodominant determinant, while P2, P3, P4, and P5 as subdominant epitopes and the other two peptides, P6 and P7, as non-immunogenic determinants of WF MHC class I molecule. Furthermore, the dominance of P1 was confirmed by the strong proliferation induced after immunization with a mixture of peptides in the presence of P1. This hierarchical distribution of the proliferative response correlated with the cytokine production. Peptide P1, comprising only 3 allogeneic amino acids (L5, L9, and T10) induced the strongest T cell proliferation and produced high levels of cytokines, especially IL-2 and IFN-g. In addition, the immunodominance of peptide P1 was confirmed by the significant reduction in the allograft survival time in comparison to the non-immunized control animals. Since the TCR Vß repertoire of rejected graft-infiltrating cells in rejected allografts was similar to the profile observed after in vitro restimulation of P1-primed T cells, we concluded that peptide P1 is able to activate the alloreactive T cell population. Our results demonstrate the particular role of the dominant peptide P1 (residues 1-19) in the allograft rejection in WF to LEW rat strain combination. In the second set of experiments, we investigated the fine specificity of the dominant peptide P1-activated T cells using peptide analogues from P1. The "recipient-adapted" analogues were designed by changing the allogeneic RT1.Au amino acids (L5, L9, T10) one-by-one with the correspondent syngeneic RT1.Al amino acids (M5, D9, I10) in the sequence of peptide P1. The six peptide analogues (A1.1-A1.6) consisting of either one or two allogeneic amino acids were able to induce a specific T cell proliferative response and cytokine production. Analogue A1.5 with only one allogeneic amino acid (L5) was of particular interest because it induced a low T cell proliferation and high cytokine levels, especially IL-4 and IL-10. In addition, immunization with A1.5 did not influence the allograft survival time in comparison to the non-immunized LEW recipients. A1.5 was the only analogue able to down-regulate the proliferation of P1-primed T cells. Our results reveal that A1.5 is an MHC competitor as confirmed by the in vitro MHC competition assay and the inhibition of the negative effect of P1 on the allograft survival time when recipients were immunized with a mixture of P1 and A1.5. These findings suggest that it is possible to design peptide analogues, such as A1.5, which do not stimulate the dominant peptide P1-specific T cell population and even more, are able to block its presentation in the MHC molecule. In all, the results indicate that the specific suppression of indirect allorecognition can be achieved by using peptide analogues of the dominant allopeptide.},
  language  = {en}
}