@article{PatzerKunzHuflageetal.2023, author = {Patzer, Theresa Sophie and Kunz, Andreas Steven and Huflage, Henner and Luetkens, Karsten Sebastian and Conrads, Nora and Gruschwitz, Philipp and Pannenbecker, Pauline and Erg{\"u}n, S{\"u}leyman and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Grunz, Jan-Peter}, title = {Quantitative and qualitative image quality assessment in shoulder examinations with a first-generation photon-counting detector CT}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {13}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-023-35367-2}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357925}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT allows for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) examinations of the shoulder without requiring an additional post-patient comb filter to narrow the detector aperture. This study was designed to compare the PCD performance with a high-end energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Sixteen cadaveric shoulders were examined with both scanners using dose-matched 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-dose/full-dose: CTDI\(_{vol}\) = 5.0/10.0 mGy). Specimens were scanned in UHR mode with the PCD-CT, whereas EID-CT examinations were conducted in accordance with the clinical standard as "non-UHR". Reconstruction of EID data employed the sharpest kernel available for standard-resolution scans (ρ\(_{50}\) = 12.3 lp/cm), while PCD data were reconstructed with both a comparable kernel (11.8 lp/cm) and a sharper dedicated bone kernel (16.5 lp/cm). Six radiologists with 2-9 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging rated image quality subjectively. Interrater agreement was analyzed by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient in a two-way random effects model. Quantitative analyses comprised noise recording and calculating signal-to-noise ratios based on attenuation measurements in bone and soft tissue. Subjective image quality was higher in UHR-PCD-CT than in EID-CT and non-UHR-PCD-CT datasets (all p < 0.001). While low-dose UHR-PCD-CT was considered superior to full-dose non-UHR studies on either scanner (all p < 0.001), ratings of low-dose non-UHR-PCD-CT and full-dose EID-CT examinations did not differ (p > 0.99). Interrater reliability was moderate, indicated by a single measures intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.66 (95\% confidence interval: 0.58-0.73; p < 0.001). Image noise was lowest and signal-to-noise ratios were highest in non-UHR-PCD-CT reconstructions at either dose level (p < 0.001). This investigation demonstrates that superior depiction of trabecular microstructure and considerable denoising can be realized without additional radiation dose by employing a PCD for shoulder CT imaging. Allowing for UHR scans without dose penalty, PCD-CT appears as a promising alternative to EID-CT for shoulder trauma assessment in clinical routine.}, language = {en} } @article{PetritschGoltzHahnetal.2011, author = {Petritsch, Bernhard and Goltz, Jan Peter and Hahn, Dietbert and Wendel, Frank}, title = {Extensive craniocervical bone pneumatization}, series = {Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology}, volume = {17}, journal = {Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology}, number = {4}, doi = {10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4299-11.2}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-139349}, pages = {308-310}, year = {2011}, abstract = {We report a case of extensive abnormal craniocervical bone pneumatization accidentally found in a patient without any history of trauma or surgery. The patient had only mild unspecific thoracic pain and bilateral paresthesia that did not correlate with computed tomography findings.}, language = {en} }