@article{DavisYuKeenanetal.2013,
  author    = {Davis, Lea K. and Yu, Dongmei and Keenan, Clare L. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Konkashbaev, Anuar I. and Derks, Eske M. and Neale, Benjamin M. and Yang, Jian and Lee, S. Hong and Evans, Patrick and Barr, Cathy L. and Bellodi, Laura and Benarroch, Fortu and Berrio, Gabriel Bedoya and Bienvenu, Oscar J. and Bloch, Michael H. and Blom, Rianne M. and Bruun, Ruth D. and Budman, Cathy L. and Camarena, Beatriz and Campbell, Desmond and Cappi, Carolina and Cardona Silgado, Julio C. and Cath, Danielle C. and Cavallini, Maria C. and Chavira, Denise A. and Chouinard, Sylvian and Conti, David V. and Cook, Edwin H. and Coric, Vladimir and Cullen, Bernadette A. and Deforce, Dieter and Delorme, Richard and Dion, Yves and Edlund, Christopher K. and Egberts, Karin and Falkai, Peter and Fernandez, Thomas V. and Gallagher, Patience J. and Garrido, Helena and Geller, Daniel and Girard, Simon L. and Grabe, Hans J. and Grados, Marco A. and Greenberg, Benjamin D. and Gross-Tsur, Varda and Haddad, Stephen and Heiman, Gary A. and Hemmings, Sian M. J. and Hounie, Ana G. and Illmann, Cornelia and Jankovic, Joseph and Jenike, Micheal A. and Kennedy, James L. and King, Robert A. and Kremeyer, Barbara and Kurlan, Roger and Lanzagorta, Nuria and Leboyer, Marion and Leckman, James F. and Lennertz, Leonhard and Liu, Chunyu and Lochner, Christine and Lowe, Thomas L. and Macciardi, Fabio and McCracken, James T. and McGrath, Lauren M. and Restrepo, Sandra C. Mesa and Moessner, Rainald and Morgan, Jubel and Muller, Heike and Murphy, Dennis L. and Naarden, Allan L. and Ochoa, William Cornejo and Ophoff, Roel A. and Osiecki, Lisa and Pakstis, Andrew J. and Pato, Michele T. and Pato, Carlos N. and Piacentini, John and Pittenger, Christopher and Pollak, Yehunda and Rauch, Scott L. and Renner, Tobias J. and Reus, Victor I. and Richter, Margaret A. and Riddle, Mark A. and Robertson, Mary M. and Romero, Roxana and Ros{\`a}rio, Maria C. and Rosenberg, David and Rouleau, Guy A. and Ruhrmann, Stephan and Ruiz-Linares, Andreas and Sampaio, Aline S. and Samuels, Jack and Sandor, Paul and Sheppard, Broke and Singer, Harvey S. and Smit, Jan H. and Stein, Dan J. and Strengman, E. and Tischfield, Jay A. and Valencia Duarte, Ana V. and Vallada, Homero and Van Nieuwerburgh, Flip and Veenstra-VanderWeele, Jeremy and Walitza, Susanne and Wang, Ying and Wendland, Jens R. and Westenberg, Herman G. M. and Shugart, Yin Yao and Miguel, Euripedes C. and McMahon, William and Wagner, Michael and Nicolini, Humberto and Posthuma, Danielle and Hanna, Gregory L. and Heutink, Peter and Denys, Damiaan and Arnold, Paul D. and Oostra, Ben A. and Nestadt, Gerald and Freimer, Nelson B. and Pauls, David L. and Wray, Naomi R. and Stewart, S. Evelyn and Mathews, Carol A. and Knowles, James A. and Cox, Nancy J. and Scharf, Jeremiah M.},
  title     = {Partitioning the Heritability of Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Reveals Differences in Genetic Architecture},
  series = {PLoS Genetics},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLoS Genetics},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1553-7390},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1003864},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127377},
  pages     = {e1003864},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5\% accounted for 21\% of the TS heritability and 0\% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BreuerMattheisenFranketal.2018,
  author    = {Breuer, Ren{\´e} and Mattheisen, Manuel and Frank, Josef and Krumm, Bertram and Treutlein, Jens and Kassem, Layla and Strohmaier, Jana and Herms, Stefan and M{\"u}hleisen, Thomas W. and Degenhardt, Franziska and Cichon, Sven and N{\"o}then, Markus M. and Karypis, George and Kelsoe, John and Greenwood, Tiffany and Nievergelt, Caroline and Shilling, Paul and Shekhtman, Tatyana and Edenberg, Howard and Craig, David and Szelinger, Szabolcs and Nurnberger, John and Gershon, Elliot and Alliey-Rodriguez, Ney and Zandi, Peter and Goes, Fernando and Schork, Nicholas and Smith, Erin and Koller, Daniel and Zhang, Peng and Badner, Judith and Berrettini, Wade and Bloss, Cinnamon and Byerley, William and Coryell, William and Foroud, Tatiana and Guo, Yirin and Hipolito, Maria and Keating, Brendan and Lawson, William and Liu, Chunyu and Mahon, Pamela and McInnis, Melvin and Murray, Sarah and Nwulia, Evaristus and Potash, James and Rice, John and Scheftner, William and Z{\"o}llner, Sebastian and McMahon, Francis J. and Rietschel, Marcella and Schulze, Thomas G.},
  title     = {Detecting significant genotype-phenotype association rules in bipolar disorder: market research meets complex genetics},
  series = {International Journal of Bipolar Disorders},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {International Journal of Bipolar Disorders},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40345-018-0132-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-220509},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Disentangling the etiology of common, complex diseases is a major challenge in genetic research. For bipolar disorder (BD), several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed. Similar to other complex disorders, major breakthroughs in explaining the high heritability of BD through GWAS have remained elusive. To overcome this dilemma, genetic research into BD, has embraced a variety of strategies such as the formation of large consortia to increase sample size and sequencing approaches. Here we advocate a complementary approach making use of already existing GWAS data: a novel data mining procedure to identify yet undetected genotype-phenotype relationships. We adapted association rule mining, a data mining technique traditionally used in retail market research, to identify frequent and characteristic genotype patterns showing strong associations to phenotype clusters. We applied this strategy to three independent GWAS datasets from 2835 phenotypically characterized patients with BD. In a discovery step, 20,882 candidate association rules were extracted. Results Two of these rules—one associated with eating disorder and the other with anxiety—remained significant in an independent dataset after robust correction for multiple testing. Both showed considerable effect sizes (odds ratio ~ 3.4 and 3.0, respectively) and support previously reported molecular biological findings. Conclusion Our approach detected novel specific genotype-phenotype relationships in BD that were missed by standard analyses like GWAS. While we developed and applied our method within the context of BD gene discovery, it may facilitate identifying highly specific genotype-phenotype relationships in subsets of genome-wide data sets of other complex phenotype with similar epidemiological properties and challenges to gene discovery efforts.},
  language  = {en}
}