@phdthesis{Ziegenhals2018,
  author    = {Ziegenhals, Thomas},
  title     = {The role of the miR-26 family in neurogenesis},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-156395},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {For the differentiation of a embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to neuronal cells (NCs) a complex and coordinated gene regulation program is needed. One important control element for neuronal differentiation is the repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor (REST) complex, which represses neuronal gene expression in non-neuronal cells. Crucial effector proteins of the REST complex are small phosphatases such as the CTDSPs (C-terminal domain small phosphatases) that regulate polymerase II activity by dephosphorylating the C-terminal domain of the polymerase, thereby repressing target genes. The stepwise inactivation of REST, including the CTDSPs, leads to the induction of a neuron-specific gene program, which ultimately induces the formation of neurons. The spatio-temporal control of REST and its effector components is therefore a crucial step for neurogenesis. In zebrafish it was shown that the REST-associated CTDSP2 is negatively regulated by the micro RNA (miR) -26b. Interestingly, the miR-26b is encoded in an intron of the primary transcript of CTDSP2. This gives the fundament of an intrinsic regulatory negative feedback loop, which is essential for the proceeding of neurogenesis. This feedback loop is active during neurogenesis, but inactive in non-neuronal cells. The reason for this is that the maturation of the precursor miR (pre-miR) to the mature miR-26 is arrested in non neuronal cells, but not in neurons. As only mature miRs are actively repressing genes, the regulation of miR-26 processing is an essential step in neurogenesis. In this study, the molecular basis of miR-26 processing regulation in the context of neurogenesis was addressed. The mature miR is processed from two larger precursors: First the primary transcript is cleaved by the enzyme DROSHA in the nucleus to form the pre-miR. The pre-miR is exported from the nucleus and processed further through the enzyme DICER to yield the mature miR. The mature miR can regulate gene expression in association with the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Multiple different scenarios in which miR processing was regulated were proposed and experimentally tested. Microinjection studies using Xenopus leavis oocytes showed that slowdown or blockage of the nucleo-cytoplasmic transport are not the reason for delayed pre-miR-26 processing. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo miR-processing assays showed that maturation is most likely regulated through a in trans acting factor, which blocks processing in non neuronal cells. Through RNA affinity chromatographic assays using zebrafish and murine lysates I was able to isolate and identify proteins that interact specifically with pre-miR-26 and could by this influence its biogenesis. Potential candidates are FMRP/FXR1/2, ZNF346 and Eral1, whose functional characterisation in the context of miR-biogenesis could now be addressed. The second part of my thesis was executed in close colaboration with the laboratory of Prof. Albrecht M{\"u}ller. The principal question was addressed how miR-26 influences neuronal gene expression and which genes are primarily affected. This research question could be addressed by using a cell culture model system, which mimics ex vivo the differentiation of ESCs to NCs via neuronal progenitor. For the functional analysis of miR-26 knock out cell lines were generated by the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. miR-26 deficient ESC keep their pluripotent state and are able to develop NPC, but show major impairment in differentiating to NCs. Through RNA deep sequencing the miR-26 induced transcriptome differences could be analysed. On the level of mRNAs it could be shown, that the expression of neuronal gene is downregulated in miR-26 deficient NCs. Interestingly, the deletion of miR-26 leads to selectively decreased levels of miRs, which on one hand regulate the REST complex and on the other hand are under transcriptional control by REST themself. This data and the discovery that induction of miR-26 leads to enrichment of other REST regulating miRs indicates that miR-26 initiates neurogenesis through stepwise inactivation of the REST complex.},
  subject      = {miRNS},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schaefer2005,
  author    = {Sch{\"a}fer, Matthias},
  title     = {Molecular mechanisms of floor plate formation and neural patterning in zebrafish},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-15789},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The vertebrate spinal cord is composed of billions of neurons and glia cells, which are formed in a highly coordinated manner during early neurogenesis. Specification of these cells at distinct positions along the dorsoventral (DV) axis of the developing spinal cord is controlled by a ventrally located signaling center, the medial floor plate (MFP). Currently, the origin and time frame of specification of this important organizer are not clear. During my PhD thesis, I have analyzed the function of the novel secreted growth factor Midkine-a (Mdka) in zebrafish. In higher vertebrates, mdk and the related factor pleiotrophin (ptn) are widely expressed during embryogenesis and are implicated in a variety of processes. The in-vivo function of both factors, however, is unclear, as knock-out mice show no embryonic phenotype. We have isolated two mdk co-orthologs, mdka and mdkb, and one single ptn gene in zebrafish. Molecular phylogenetic analyses have shown that these genes evolved after two large gene block duplications. In contrast to higher vertebrates, zebrafish mdk and ptn genes have undergone functional divergence, resulting in mostly non-redundant expression patterns and functions. I have shown by overexpression and knock-down analyses that Mdka is required for MFP formation during zebrafish neurulation. Unlike the previously known MFP inducing factors, mdka is not expressed within the embryonic shield or tailbud but is dynamically expressed in the paraxial mesoderm. I used epistatic and mutant analyses to show that Mdka acts independently from these factors. This indicates a novel mechanism of Mdka dependent MFP formation during zebrafish neurulation. To get insight into the signaling properties of zebrafish Mdka, the function of both Mdk proteins and the candidate receptor Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (Alk) have been compared. Knock-down of mdka and mdkb resulted in the same reduction of iridophores as in mutants deficient for Alk. This indicates that Alk could be a putative receptor of Mdks during zebrafish embryogenesis. In most vertebrate species a lateral floor plate (LFP) domain adjacent to the MFP has been defined. In higher vertebrates it has been shown that the LFP is located within the p3 domain, which forms V3 interneurons. It is unclear, how different cell types in this domain are organized during early embryogenesis. I have analyzed a novel homeobox gene in zebrafish, nkx2.2b, which is exclusively expressed in the LFP. Overexpression, mutant and inhibitor analyses showed that nkx2.2b is activated by Sonic hedgehog (Shh), but repressed by retinoids and the motoneuron-inducing factor Islet-1 (Isl1). I could show that in zebrafish LFP and p3 neuronal cells are located at the same level along the DV axis, but alternate along the anteroposterior (AP) axis. Moreover, these two different cell populations require different levels of HH signaling and nkx2.2 activities. This provides new insights into the structure of the vertebrate spinal cord and suggests a novel mechanism of neural patterning.},
  subject      = {Zebrab{\"a}rbling},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Dill2012,
  author    = {Dill, Holger},
  title     = {Functional characterization of the microRNA-26 family in zebrafish neurogenesis},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-70757},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Formation oft the central nervous system (CNS) from multipotent neuronal stem cells (NSCs) requires a tightly controlled, step-wise activation of the neuronal gene expression program. Expression of neuronal genes at the transition from neural stem cell to mature neuron (i. e. neuronal cell differentiation) is controlled by the Repressor element 1 (RE1) silencing transcription factor (REST) complex. As a master transcriptional regulator, the REST-complex specifically inhibits expression of neuronal genes in non-neuronal tissues and neuronal progenitor cells. Differentiation of NSCs to mature neurons requires the activation of genes controlled by the REST-complex, but how abrogation of REST-complex mediated repression is achieved during neurogenesis is only poorly understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small regulatory RNAs that posttranscriptionally control target gene expression. Binding of miRNAs to target sequences in the 3'UTR of mRNAs, leads either to degradation or translational inhibition of the mRNA. Distinct neuronal miRNAs (e.g. miR-124) were shown to modulate REST-complex activity by silencing expression of REST-complex components. Interestingly, these miRNAs are also under transcriptional control of the REST-complex and inactivation of the REST-complex precedes their expression. Hence, additional factors are required for derepression of neuronal genes at the onset of neurogenesis. In this study function of the miR-26 family during neurogenesis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) was analyzed. Computational target prediction revealed a number of REST-complex components as putative miR-26 targets. One of these predicted target genes, the C-terminal domain small phosphatase 2 (Ctdsp2) was validated as an in vivo target for miR-26b. Ctdsps are important cofactors of REST and suppress neuronal gene expression by dephosphorylating the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Interestingly, miR-26b is encoded in an intron of the ctdsp2 primary transcript and is cotranscribed together with its host gene. Hence, miR-26b modulates expression of its host gene ctdsp2 in an intrinsic negative autoregulatory loop. This negative autoregulatory loop is inactive in NSCs because miR-26b biogenesis is inhibited at the precursor level. Generation of mature miR-26b is activated during neurogenesis, where it suppresses Ctdsp2 protein expression and is required for neuronal cell differentiation in vivo. Strikingly, miR-26b is expressed prior to miR-124 during neuronal cell differentiation. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate about a function of miR-26b in early events of neurogenesis. In line with this assumption, knockdown of miR-26b in zebrafish embryos results in downregulation of REST-complex controlled neuronal genes and a block in neuronal cell differentiation, most likely due to aberrant regulation of Ctdsp2 expression. This is evident by reduced numbers of secondary motor neurons compared to control siblings. In contrast, motor neuron progenitor cells and glia cells were not affected by depletion of miR-26b.This study identifies the ctdsp2/miR-26b autoregulatory loop as the first experimentally validated interaction between an intronic miRNA and its host gene transcript. Silencing of ctdsp2 by miR-26b in neurons is possible because biogenesis of the ctdsp2 mRNA and mature mir-26b is uncoupled at the posttranscriptional level. Furthermore the obtained data indicate a cell type specific role for miR-26b in vertebrate neurogenesis and CNS development.},
  subject      = {Zebrab{\"a}rbling},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Ahmad2012,
  author    = {Ahmad, Ruhel},
  title     = {Neurogenesis from parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cells},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-75935},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Imprinted genes play important roles in brain development. As the neural developmental capabilities of human parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells (hpESCs) with only a maternal genome were not assessed in great detail, hence here the potential of hpESCs to differentiate into various neural subtypes was determined. In addition DNA methylation and expression of imprinted genes upon neural differentiation was also investigated. The results demonstrated that hpESC-derived neural stem cells (hpNSCs) showed expression of NSC markers Sox1, Nestin, Pax6, and Musashi1 (MS1), the silencing of pluripotency genes (Oct4, Nanog) and the absence of activation of neural crest (Snai2, FoxD3) and mesodermal (Acta1) markers. Moreover, confocal images of hpNSC cultures exhibited ubiquitous expression of NSC markers Nestin, Sox1, Sox2 and Vimentin. Differentiating hpNSCs for 28 days generated neural subtypes with neural cell type-specific morphology and expression of neuronal and glial markers, including Tuj1, NeuN, Map2, GFAP, O4, Tau, Synapsin1 and GABA. hpNSCs also responded to region-specific differentiation signals and differentiated into regional phenotypes such as midbrain dopaminergic- and motoneuron-type cells. hpESC-derived neurons showed typical neuronal Na+/K+ currents in voltage clamp mode, elicited multiple action potentials with a maximum frequency of 30 Hz. Cell depicted a typical neuron-like current pattern that responded to selective pharmacological blockers of sodium (tetrodotoxin) and potassium (tetraethylammonium) channels. Furthermore, in hpESCs and hpNSCs the majority of CpGs of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) KvDMR1 were methylated whereas DMR1 (H19/Igf2 locus) showed partial or complete absence of CpG methylation, which is consistent with a parthenogenetic (PG) origin. Upon differentiation parent-of-origin-specific gene expression was maintained in hpESCs and hpNSCs as demonstrated by imprinted gene expression analyses. Together this shows that despite the lack of a paternal genome, hpNSCs are proficient in differentiating into glial- and neuron-type cells, which exhibit electrical activity similar to newly formed neurons. Moreover, maternal-specific gene expression and imprinting-specific DNA-methylation are largely maintained upon neural differentiation. hpESCs are a means to generate histocompatible and disease allele-free ESCs. Additionally, hpESCs are a unique model to study the influence of imprinting on neurogenesis.},
  subject      = {Embryonale Stammzelle},
  language  = {en}
}