@article{SteinkePeitschLudwigetal.2013, author = {Steinke, Sabine I. B. and Peitsch, Wiebke K. and Ludwig, Alexander and Goebeler, Matthias}, title = {Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy}, series = {PLOS ONE}, volume = {8}, journal = {PLOS ONE}, number = {10}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0078152}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128235}, pages = {e78152}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Treatment modalities of chronic plaque psoriasis have dramatically changed over the past ten years with a still continuing shift from inpatient to outpatient treatment. This development is mainly caused by outpatient availability of highly efficient and relatively well-tolerated systemic treatments, in particular BioLogicals. In addition, inpatient treatment is time-and cost-intense, conflicting with the actual burst of health expenses and with patient preferences. Nevertheless, inpatient treatment with dithranol and UV light still is a major mainstay of psoriasis treatment in Germany. The current study aims at comparing the total costs of inpatient treatment and outpatient follow-up to mere outpatient therapy with different modalities (topical treatment, phototherapy, classic systemic therapy or BioLogicals) over a period of 12 months. To this end, a retrospective cost-of-illness study was conducted on 120 patients treated at the University Medical Centre Mannheim between 2005 and 2006. Inpatient therapy caused significantly higher direct medical, indirect and total annual costs than outpatient treatment (13,042 (sic) versus 2,984 (sic)). Its strong influence on cost levels was confirmed by regression analysis, with total costs rising by 104.3\% in case of inpatient treatment. Patients receiving BioLogicals produced the overall highest costs, whereas outpatient treatment with classic systemic antipsoriatic medications was less cost-intense than other alternatives.}, language = {en} } @article{DeGiorgiBuonaguroWorschechetal.2013, author = {De Giorgi, Valeria and Buonaguro, Luigi and Worschech, Andrea and Tornesello, Maria Lina and Izzo, Francesco and Marincola, Francesco M. and Wang, Ena and Buonaguro, Franco M.}, title = {Molecular Signatures Associated with HCV-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastasis}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {8}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0056153}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131155}, pages = {e56153}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that differ in risk factors and genetic alterations. In Italy, particularly Southern Italy, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents the main cause of HCC. Using high-density oligoarrays, we identified consistent differences in gene-expression between HCC and normal liver tissue. Expression patterns in HCC were also readily distinguishable from those associated with liver metastases. To characterize molecular events relevant to hepatocarcinogenesis and identify biomarkers for early HCC detection, gene expression profiling of 71 liver biopsies from HCV-related primary HCC and corresponding HCV-positive non-HCC hepatic tissue, as well as gastrointestinal liver metastases paired with the apparently normal peri-tumoral liver tissue, were compared to 6 liver biopsies from healthy individuals. Characteristic gene signatures were identified when normal tissue was compared with HCV-related primary HCC, corresponding HCV-positive non-HCC as well as gastrointestinal liver metastases. Pathway analysis classified the cellular and biological functions of the genes differentially expressed as related to regulation of gene expression and post-translational modification in HCV-related primary HCC; cellular Growth and Proliferation, and Cell-To-Cell Signaling and Interaction in HCV-related non HCC samples; Cellular Growth and Proliferation and Cell Cycle in metastasis. Also characteristic gene signatures were identified of HCV-HCC progression for early HCC diagnosis. Conclusions: A diagnostic molecular signature complementing conventional pathologic assessment was identified.}, language = {en} } @article{DoerhoeferLammertKraneetal.2013, author = {D{\"o}rh{\"o}fer, Lena and Lammert, Alexander and Krane, Vera and Gorski, Mathias and Banas, Bernhard and Wanner, Christoph and Kr{\"a}mer, Bernhard K. and Heid, Iris M. and B{\"o}ger, Carsten A.}, title = {Study design of DIACORE (DIAbetes COhoRtE) - a cohort study of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2}, series = {BMC Medical Genetics}, volume = {14}, journal = {BMC Medical Genetics}, number = {25}, issn = {1471-2350}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2350-14-25}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122040}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is highly associated with increased risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD), end stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiovascular morbidity. Epidemiological and genetic studies generate hypotheses for innovative strategies in DM2 management by unravelling novel mechanisms of diabetes complications, which is essential for future intervention trials. We have thus initiated the DIAbetes COhoRtE study (DIACORE). Methods: DIACORE is a prospective cohort study aiming to recruit 6000 patients of self-reported Caucasian ethnicity with prevalent DM2 for at least 10 years of follow-up. Study visits are performed in University-based recruiting clinics in Germany using standard operating procedures. All prevalent DM2 patients in outpatient clinics surrounding the recruiting centers are invited to participate. At baseline and at each 2-year follow-up examination, patients are subjected to a core phenotyping protocol. This includes a standardized online questionnaire and physical examination to determine incident micro-and macrovascular DM2 complications, malignancy and hospitalization, with a primary focus on renal events. Confirmatory outcome information is requested from patient records. Blood samples are obtained for a centrally analyzed standard laboratory panel and for biobanking of aliquots of serum, plasma, urine, mRNA and DNA for future scientific use. A subset of the cohort is subjected to extended phenotyping, e. g. sleep apnea screening, skin autofluorescence measurement, non-mydriatic retinal photography and non-invasive determination of arterial stiffness. Discussion: DIACORE will enable the prospective evaluation of factors involved in DM2 complication pathogenesis using high-throughput technologies in biosamples and genetic epidemiological studies.}, language = {en} }