@phdthesis{Wolter2015, author = {Wolter, Patrick}, title = {Characterization of the mitotic localization and function of the novel DREAM target GAS2L3 and Mitotic kinesins are regulated by the DREAM complex, often up-regulated in cancer cells, and are potential targets for anti-cancer therapy}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122531}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The recently discovered human DREAM complex (for DP, RB-like, E2F and MuvB complex) is a chromatin-associated pocket protein complex involved in cell cycle- dependent gene expression. DREAM consists of five core subunits and forms a complex either with the pocket protein p130 and the transcription factor E2F4 to repress gene expression or with the transcription factors B-MYB and FOXM1 to promote gene expression. Gas2l3 was recently identified by our group as a novel DREAM target gene. Subsequent characterization in human cell lines revealed that GAS2L3 is a microtubule and F-actin cross-linking protein, expressed in G2/M, plays a role in cytokinesis, and is important for chromosomal stability. The aim of the first part of the study was to analyze how expression of GAS2L3 is regulated by DREAM and to provide a better understanding of the function of GAS2L3 in mitosis and cytokinesis. ChIP assays revealed that the repressive and the activating form of DREAM bind to the GAS2L3 promoter. RNA interference (RNAi) mediated GAS2L3 depletion demonstrated the requirement of GAS2L3 for proper cleavage furrow ingression in cytokinesis. Immunofluorescence-based localization studies showed a localization of GAS2L3 at the mitotic spindle in mitosis and at the midbody in cytokinesis. Additional experiments demonstrated that the GAS2L3 GAR domain, a putative microtubule- binding domain, is responsible for GAS2L3 localization to the constriction zones in cytokinesis suggesting a function for GAS2L3 in the abscission process. DREAM is known to promote G2/M gene expression. DREAM target genes include several mitotic kinesins and mitotic microtubule-associated proteins (mitotic MAPs). However, it is not clear to what extent DREAM regulates mitotic kinesins and MAPs, so far. Furthermore, a comprehensive study of mitotic kinesin expression in cancer cell lines is still missing. Therefore, the second major aim of the thesis was to characterize the regulation of mitotic kinesins and MAPs by DREAM, to investigate the expression of mitotic kinesins in cancer cell line panels and to evaluate them as possible anti-cancer targets. ChIP assays together with RNAi mediated DREAM subunit depletion experiments demonstrated that DREAM is a master regulator of mitotic kinesins. Furthermore, expression analyses in a panel of breast and lung cancer cell lines revealed that mitotic kinesins are up-regulated in the majority of cancer cell lines in contrast to non-transformed controls. Finally, an inducible lentiviral-based shRNA system was developed to effectively deplete mitotic kinesins. Depletion of selected mitotic kinesins resulted in cytokinesis failures and strong anti-proliferative effects in several human cancer cell lines. Thus, this system will provide a robust tool for future investigation of mitotic kinesin function in cancer cells.}, subject = {Zellzyklus}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Gnamlin2015, author = {Gnamlin, Prisca}, title = {Use of Tumor Vasculature for Successful Treatment of Carcinomas by Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-119019}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Tumor-induced angiogenesis is of major interest for oncology research. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most potent angiogenic factor characterized so far. VEGF blockade was shown to be sufficient for angiogenesis inhibition and subsequent tumor regression in several preclinical tumor models. Bevacizumab was the first treatment targeting specifically tumor-induced angiogenesis through VEGF blockade to be approved by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) for cancer treatment. However, after very promising results in preclinical evaluations, VEGF blockade did not show the expected success in patients. Some tumors became resistant to VEGF blockade. Several factors have been accounted responsible, the over-expression of other angiogenic factors, the noxious influence of VEFG blockade on normal tissues, the selection of hypoxia resistant neoplastic cells, the recruitment of hematopoietic progenitor cells and finally the transient nature of angiogenesis inhibition by VEGF blockade. The development of blocking agents against other angiogenic factors like placental growth factor (PlGF) and Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) allows the development of an anti-angiogenesis strategy adapted to the profile of the tumor. Oncolytic virotherapy uses the natural propensity of viruses to colonize tumors to treat cancer. The recombinant vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 was shown to infect, colonize and lyse several tumor types. Its descendant GLV-1h108, expressing an anti-VEGF antibody, was proved in previous studies to inhibit efficiently tumor induced angiogenesis. Additional VACVs expressing single chain antibodies (scAb) antibodies against PlGF and Ang-2 alone or in combination with anti VEGF scAb were designed. In this study, VACV-mediated anti-angiogenesis treatments have been evaluated in several preclinical tumor models. The efficiency of PlGF blockade, alone or in combination with VEGF, mediated by VACV has been established and confirmed. PlGF inhibition alone or with VEGF reduced tumor burden 5- and 2-folds more efficiently than the control virus, respectively. Ang-2 blockade efficiency for cancer treatment gave controversial results when tested in different laboratories. Here we demonstrated that unlike VEGF, the success of Ang-2 blockade is not only correlated to the strength of the blockade. A particular balance between Ang-2, VEGF and Ang-1 needs to be induced by the treatment to see a regression of the tumor and an improved survival. We saw that Ang-2 inhibition delayed tumor growth up to 3-folds compared to the control virus. These same viruses induced statistically significant tumor growth delays. This study unveiled the need to establish an angiogenic profile of the tumor to be treated as well as the necessity to better understand the synergic effects of VEGF and Ang-2. In addition angiogenesis inhibition by VACV-mediated PlGF and Ang-2 blockade was able to reduce the number of metastases and migrating tumor cells (even more efficiently than VEGF blockade). VACV colonization of tumor cells, in vitro, was limited by VEGF, when the use of the anti-VEGF VACV GLV-1h108 drastically improved the colonization efficiency up to 2-fold, 72 hours post-infection. These in vitro data were confirmed by in vivo analysis of tumors. Fourteen days post-treatment, the anti-VEGF virus GLV-1h108 was colonizing 78.8\% of the tumors when GLV-1h68 colonization rate was 49.6\%. These data confirmed the synergistic effect of VEGF blockade and VACV replication for tumor regression. Three of the tumor cell lines used to assess VACV-mediated angiogenesis inhibition were found, in certain conditions, to mimic either endothelial cell or pericyte functions, and participate directly to the vascular structure. The expression by these tumor cells of e-selectin, p-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, normally expressed on activated endothelial cells, corroborates our findings. These proteins play an important role in immune cell recruitment, and there amount vary in presence of VEGF, PlGF and Ang-2, confirming the involvement of angiogenic factors in the immuno-modulatory abilities of tumors. In this study VACV-mediated angiogenesis blockade proved its potential as a therapeutic agent able to treat different tumor types and prevent resistance observed during bevacizumab treatment by acting on different factors. First, the expression of several antibodies by VACV would prevent another angiogenic factor to take over VEGF and stimulate angiogenesis. Then, the ability of VACV to infect tumor cells would prevent them to form blood vessel-like structures to sustain tumor growth, and the localized delivery of the antibody would decrease the risk of adverse effects. Next, the blockade of angiogenic factors would improve VACV replication and decrease the immune-modulatory effect of tumors. Finally the fact that angiogenesis blockade lasts until total regression of the tumor would prevent the recovery of the tumor-associated vasculature and the relapse of patients.}, subject = {Vaccinia-Virus}, language = {en} }