@phdthesis{Yarali2008,
  author    = {Yarali, Ayse},
  title     = {Aspects of predictive learning in the fruit fly},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-28741},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Past experience contributes to behavioural organization mainly via learning: Animals learn otherwise ordinary cues as predictors for biologically significant events. This thesis studies such predictive, associative learning, using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. I ask two main questions, which complement each other: One deals with the processing of those cues that are to be learned as predictors for an important event; the other one deals with the processing of the important event itself, which is to be predicted. Do fruit flies learn about combinations of olfactory and visual cues? I probe larval as well as adult fruit flies for the learning about combinations of olfactory and visual cues, using a so called 'biconditional discrimination' task: During training, one odour is paired with reinforcement only in light, but not in darkness; the other odour in turn is reinforced only in darkness, but not in light. Thus, neither the odours nor the visual conditions alone predict reinforcement, only combinations of both do. I find no evidence that either larval or adult fruit flies were to solve such task, speaking against a cross-talk between olfactory and visual modalities. Previous studies however suggest such cross-talk. To reconcile these results, I suggest classifying different kinds of interaction between sensory modalities, according to their site along the sensory-motor continuum: I consider an interaction 'truly' cross-modal, if it is between the specific features of the stimuli. I consider an interaction 'amodal' if it instead engages the behavioural tendencies or 'values' elicited by each stimulus. Such reasoning brings me to conclude that different behavioural tasks require different kinds of interaction between sensory modalities; whether a given kind of interaction will be found depends on the neuronal infrastructure, which is a function of the species and the developmental stage. Predictive learning of pain-relief in fruit flies Fruit flies build two opposing kinds of memory, based on an experience with electric shock: Those odours that precede shock during training are learned as predictors for punishment and are subsequently avoided; those odours that follow shock during training on the other hand are learned as signals for relief and are subsequently approached. I focus on such relief learning. I start with a detailed parametric analysis of relief learning, testing for reproducibility as well as effects of gender, repetition of training, odour identity, odour concentration and shock intensity. I also characterize how relief memories, once formed, decay. In addition, concerning the psychological mechanisms of relief learning, first, I show that relief learning establishes genuinely associative conditioned approach behaviour and second, I report that it is most likely not mediated by context associations. These results enable the following neurobiological analysis of relief learning; further, they will form in the future the basis for a mathematical model; finally, they will guide the researchers aiming at uncovering relief learning in other experimental systems. Next, I embark upon neurogenetic analysis of relief learning. First, I report that fruit flies mutant for the so called white gene build overall more 'negative' memories about an experience with electric shock. That is, in the white mutants, learning about the painful onset of shock is enhanced, whereas learning about the relieving offset of shock is diminished. As they are coherently affected, these two kinds of learning should be in a balance. The molecular mechanism of the effect of white on this balance remains unresolved. Finally, as a first step towards a neuronal circuit analysis of relief learning, I compare it to reward learning and punishment learning. I find that relief learning is distinct from both in terms of the requirement for biogenic amine signaling: Reward and punishment are respectively signalled by octopamine and dopamine, for relief learning, either of these seem dispensible. Further, I find no evidence for roles for two other biogenic amines, tyramine and serotonin in relief learning. Based on these findings I give directions for further research.},
  subject      = {Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Thum2006,
  author    = {Thum, Andreas Stephan},
  title     = {Sugar reward learning in Drosophila : neuronal circuits in Drosophila associative olfactory learning},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-17930},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Genetic intervention in the fly Drosophila melanogaster has provided strong evidence that the mushroom bodies of the insect brain act as the seat of memory traces for aversive and appetitive olfactory learning (reviewed in Heisenberg, 2003). In flies, electroshock is mainly used as negative reinforcer. Unfortunately this fact complicates a comparative consideration with other inscets as most studies use sugar as positive reinforcer. For example, several lines of evidence from honeybee and moth have suggested another site, the antennal lobe, to house neuronal plasticity underlying appetitive olfactory memory (reviewed in Menzel, 2001; Daly et al., 2004). Because of this I focused my work mainly on appetitive olfactory learning. In the first part of my thesis, I used a novel genetic tool, the TARGET system (McGuire et al., 2003), which allows the temporally controlled expression of a given effector gene in a defined set of cells. Comparing effector genes which either block neurotransmission or ablate cells showed important differences, revealing that selection of the appropriate effector gene is critical for evaluating the function of neural circuits. In the second part, a new engram of olfactory memory in the Drosophila projection neurons is described by restoring Rutabaga adenlylate cyclase (rut-AC) activity specifically in these cells. Expression of wild-type rutabaga in the projection neurons fully rescued the defect in sugar reward memory, but not in aversive electric shock memory. No difference was found in the stability of the appetitive memories rescued either in projection neurons or Kenyon cells. In the third part of the thesis I tried to understand how the reinforcing signals for sugar reward are internally represented. In the bee Hammer (1993) described a single octopaminergic neuron - called VUMmx1 - that mediates the sugar stimulus in associative olfactory reward learning. Analysis of single VUM neurons in the fly (Selcho, 2006) identified a neuron with a similar morphology as the VUMmx1 neuron. As there is a mutant in Drosophila lacking the last enzymatic step in octopamine synthesis (Monastirioti et al., 1996), Tyramine beta Hydroxylase, I was able to show that local Tyramine beta Hydroxylase expression successfully rescued sugar reward learning. This allows to conclude that about 250 cells including the VUM cluster are sufficient for mediating the sugar reinforcement signal in the fly. The description of a VUMmx1 similar neuron and the involvement of the VUM cluster in mediating the octopaminergic sugar stimulus are the first steps in establishing a neuronal map for US processing in Drosophila. Based on this work several experiments are contrivable to reach this ultimate goal in the fly. Taken together, the described similiarities between Drosophila and honeybee regarding the memory organisation in MBs and PNs and the proposed internal representation of the sugar reward suggest an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for appetitive olfactory learning in insects.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Solanki2013,
  author    = {Solanki, Narendra},
  title     = {Novelty choice in Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-103219},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {This study explores novelty choice, a behavioral paradigm for the investigation of visual pattern recognition and learning of the fly Drosophila melanogaster in the flight simulator. Pattern recognition in novelty choice differs significantly from pattern recognition studied by heat conditioning, although both paradigms use the same test. Out of the four pattern parameters that the flies can learn in heat conditioning, novelty choice can be shown for height (horizontal bars differing in height), size and vertical compactness but not for oblique bars oriented at +/- 45°. Upright and inverted Ts [differing in their centers of gravity (CsOG) by 13°] that have been extensively used for heat conditioning experiments, do not elicit novelty choice. In contrast, horizontal bars differing in their CsOG by 13° do elicit novelty choice; so do the Ts after increasing their CsOG difference from 13° to 23°. This indicates that in the Ts the heights of the CsOG are not the only pattern parameters that matter for the novelty choice behavior. The novelty choice and heat conditioning paradigms are further differentiated using the gene rutabaga (rut) coding for a type 1 adenylyl cyclase. This protein had been shown to be involved in memory formation in the heat conditioning paradigm. Novelty choice is not affected by mutations in the rut gene. This is in line with the finding that dopamine, which in olfactory learning is known to regulate Rutabaga via the dopamine receptor Dumb in the mushroom bodies, is dispensable for novelty choice. It is concluded that in novelty choice the Rut cAMP pathway is not involved. Novelty choice requires short term working memory, as has been described in spatial orientation during locomotion. The protein S6KII that has been shown to be involved in visual orientation memory in walking flies is found here to be also required for novelty choice. As in heat conditioning the central complex plays a major role in novelty choice. The S6KII mutant phenotype for height can be rescued in some subsets of the ring neurons of the ellipsoid body. In addition the finding that the ellipsoid body mutants ebo678 and eboKS263 also show a mutant phenotype for height confirm the importance of ellipsoid body for height novelty choice. Interestingly some neurons in the F1 layer of the fan-shaped body are necessary for height novelty choice. Furthermore, different novelty choice phenotypes for different pattern parameters are found with and without mushroom bodies. Mushroom bodies are required in novelty choice for size but they are dispensable for height and vertical compactness. This special circuit requirement for the size parameter in novelty choice is found using various means of interference with mushroom body function during development or adulthood.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schwaerzel2003,
  author    = {Schw{\"a}rzel, Martin},
  title     = {Localizing engrams of olfactory memories in Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-5065},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Zars and co-workers were able to localize an engram of aversive olfactory memory to the mushroom bodies of Drosophila (Zars et al., 2000). In this thesis, I followed up on this finding in two ways. Inspired by Zars et al. (2000), I first focused on the whether it would also be possible to localize memory extinction.While memory extinction is well established behaviorally, little is known about the underlying circuitry and molecular mechanisms. In extension to the findings by Zars et al (2000), I show that aversive olfactory memories remain localized to a subset of mushroom body Kenyon cells for up to 3 hours. Extinction localizes to the same set of Kenyon cells. This common localization suggests a model in which unreinforced presentations of a previously learned odorant intracellularly antagonizes the signaling cascades underlying memory formation. The second part also targets memory localization, but addresses appetitive memory. I show that memories for the same olfactory cue can be established through either sugar or electric shock reinforcement. Importantly, these memories localize to the same set of neurons within the mushroom body. Thus, the question becomes apparent how the same signal can be associated with different events. It is shown that two different monoamines are specificaly necessary for formation of either of these memories, dopamine in case of electric shock and octopamine in case of sugar memory, respectively. Taking the representation of the olfactory cue within the mushroom bodies into account, the data suggest that the two memory traces are located in the same Kenyon cells, but in separate subcellular domains, one modulated by dopamine, the other by octopamine. Taken together, this study takes two further steps in the search for the engram. (1) The result that in Drosophila olfactory learning several memories are organized within the same set of Kenyon cells is in contrast to the pessimism expressed by Lashley that is might not be possible to localize an engram. (2) Beyond localization, a possibible mechanism how several engrams about the same stimulus can be localized within the same neurons might be suggested by the models of subcellular organisation, as postulated in case of appetitive and aversive memory on the one hand and acquisition and extinction of aversive memory on the other hand.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Scholl2015,
  author    = {Scholl, Christina},
  title     = {Cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to behavioral transitions and learning in the honeybee},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115527},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The honeybee Apis mellifera is a social insect well known for its complex behavior and the ability to learn tasks associated with central place foraging, such as visual navigation or to learn and remember odor-reward associations. Although its brain is smaller than 1mm² with only 8.2 x 105 neurons compared to ~ 20 x 109 in humans, bees still show amazing social, cognitive and learning skills. They express an age - related division of labor with nurse bees staying inside the hive and performing tasks like caring for the brood or cleaning, and foragers who collect food and water outside the hive. This challenges foragers with new responsibilities like sophisticated navigation skills to find and remember food sources, drastic changes in the sensory environment and to communicate new information to other bees. Associated with this plasticity of the behavior, the brain and especially the mushroom bodies (MBs) - sensory integration and association centers involved in learning and memory formation - undergo massive structural and functional neuronal alterations. Related to this background my thesis on one hand focuses on neuronal plasticity and underlying molecular mechanisms in the MBs that accompany the nurse - forager transition. In the first part I investigated an endogenous and an internal factor that may contribute to the nurse - forager phenotype plasticity and the correlating changes in neuronal network in the MBs: sensory exposure (light) and juvenile hormone (JH). Young bees were precociously exposed to light and subsequently synaptic complexes (microglomeruli, MG) in the MBs or respectively hemolymph juvenile hormone (JH) levels were quantified. The results show that light input indeed triggered a significant decrease in MG density, and mass spectrometry JH detection revealed an increase in JH titer. Interestingly light stimulation in young bees (presumably nurse bees) triggered changes in MG density and JH levels comparable to natural foragers. This indicates that both sensory stimuli as well as the endocrine system may play a part in preparing bees for the behavioral transition to foraging. Considering a connection between the JH levels and synaptic remodeling I used gene knockdown to disturb JH pathways and artificially increase the JH level. Even though the knockdown was successful, the results show that MG densities remained unchanged, showing no direct effect of JH on synaptic restructuring. To find a potential mediator of structural synaptic plasticity I focused on the calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in the second part of my thesis. CaMKII is a protein known to be involved in neuronal and behavioral plasticity and also plays an important part in structural plasticity reorganizing synapses. Therefore it is an interesting candidate for molecular mechanisms underlying MG reorganization in the MBs in the honeybee. Corresponding to the high abundance of CaMKII in the learning center in vertebrates (hippocampus), CaMKII was shown to be enriched in the MBs of the honeybee. Here I first investigated the function of CaMKII in learning and memory formation as from vertebrate work CaMKII is known to be associated with the strengthening of synaptic connections inducing long term potentiation and memory formation. The experimental approach included manipulating CaMKII function using 2 different inhibitors and a specific siRNA to create a CaMKII knockdown phenotype. Afterwards bees were subjected to classical olfactory conditioning which is known to induce stable long-term memory. All bees showed normal learning curves and an intact memory acquisition, short-term and mid-term memory (1 hour retention). However, in all cases long-term memory formation was significantly disrupted (24 and 72 hour retention). These results suggests the necessity of functional CaMKII in the MBs for the induction of both early and late phases of long-term memory in honeybees. The neuronal and molecular bases underlying long-term memory and the resulting plasticity in behavior is key to understanding higher brain function and phenotype plasticity. In this context CaMKII may be an important mediator inducing structural synaptic and neuronal changes in the MB synaptic network.},
  subject      = {Biene},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schleyer2012,
  author    = {Schleyer, Michael},
  title     = {Integrating past, present and future: mechanisms of a simple decision in larval Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-78923},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Is behaviour response or action? In this Thesis I study this question regarding a rather simple organism, the larva of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Despite its numerically simple brain and limited behavioural repertoire, it is nevertheless capable to accomplish surprisingly complex tasks. After association of an odour and a rewarding or punishing reinforcement signal, the learnt odour is able to retrieve the formed memory trace. However, the activated memory trace is not automatically turned into learned behaviour: Appetitive memory traces are behaviourally expressed only in absence of the rewarding tastant whereas aversive memory traces are behaviourally expressed in the presence of the punishing tastant. The 'decision' whether to behaviourally express a memory trace or not relies on a quantitive comparison between memory trace and current situation: only if the memory trace (after odour-sugar training) predicts a stronger sugar reward than currently present, animals show appetitive conditioned behaviour. Learned appetitive behaviour is best seen as active search for food - being pointless in the presence of (enough) food. Learned aversive behaviour, in turn, can be seen as escape from a punishment - being pointless in absence of punishment. Importantly, appetitive and aversive memory traces can be formed and retrieved independent from each other but also can, under appriate circumstances, summate to jointly organise conditioned behaviour. In contrast to learned behaviour, innate olfactory behaviour is not influenced by gustatory processing and vice versa. Thus, innate olfactory and gustatory behaviour is rather rigid and reflexive in nature, being executed almost regardless of other environmental cues. I suggest a behavioural circuit-model of chemosensory behaviour and the 'decision' process whether to behaviourally express a memory trace or not. This model reflects known components of the larval chemobehavioural circuit and provides clear hypotheses about the kinds of architecture to look for in the currently unknown parts of this circuit. The second chapter deals with gustatory perception and processing (especially of bitter substances). Quinine, the bitter tastant in tonic water and bitter lemon, is aversive for larvae, suppresses feeding behaviour and can act as aversive reinforcer in learning experiments. However, all three examined behaviours differ in their dose-effect dynamics, suggesting different molecular and cellular processing streams at some level. Innate choice behaviour, thought to be relatively reflexive and hard-wired, nevertheless can be influenced by the gustatory context. That is, attraction toward sweet tastants is decreased in presence of bitter tastants. The extent of this inhibitory effect depends on the concentration of both sweet and bitter tastant. Importantly, sweet tastants differ in their sensitivity to bitter interference, indicating a stimulus-specific mechanism. The molecular and cellular processes underlying the inhibitory effect of bitter tastants are unknown, but the behavioural results presented here provide a framework to further investigate interactions of gustatory processing streams.},
  subject      = {Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{SchelpgebTheis2023,
  author    = {Schelp [geb. Theis], Leonie},
  title     = {Zielorientierung am Arbeitsplatz - Ans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r die Mitarbeiterentwicklung},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-20160},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201602},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Die aktuellen Ver{\"a}nderungen der Arbeitswelt erfordern eine stetige Anpassung an immer neue Herausforderungen seitens der Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmer. Lebenslanges Lernen und damit eine kontinuierliche Weiterbildung der Mitarbeiter ist essentiell f{\"u}r Unternehmen, um auf dem schnelllebigen Arbeitsmarkt wettbewerbsf{\"a}hig zu sein. Die Bereitschaft und die Motivation von Menschen, dazuzulernen, ist jedoch sehr unterschiedlich. Eine m{\"o}gliche Erkl{\"a}rung daf{\"u}r liefert die dispositionelle Zielorientierung, welche der Achievement-Goal-Theorie entstammt. Das Konstrukt beschreibt, ob Menschen eine individuelle Pr{\"a}ferenz f{\"u}r Lernziele (z.B. Kompetenzzuwachs) oder Leistungsziele (z.B. gute Beurteilungen bekommen oder schlechte Beurteilungen vermeiden) haben. Neben den Pers{\"o}nlichkeitsaspekten konzentriert sich die Forschung im Rahmen der Achievement-Goal-Theorie auch auf den Einfluss der Umgebung auf Lern- und Leistungsprozesse. Die sogenannte arbeitsplatzbezogene Zielorientierung beschreibt die wahrgenommene Zielstruktur der Arbeitsumgebung und stellt das situationsbedingte Gegenst{\"u}ck der Dispositionen dar. Zahlreiche Befunde aus dem Bereich der p{\"a}dagogischen Psychologie zu Zielstrukturen der Umgebung zeigen einen Einfluss auf beispielsweise Lernerfolg, Motivation, Selbstregulationsprozesse oder Leistung. Zielstrukturen im Arbeitskontext stellen hingegen ein bisher wenig beachtetes Konstrukt dar. Ausgehend von den aktuellen Befunden zu Zielstrukturen, k{\"o}nnte die arbeitsplatzbezogene Zielorientierung jedoch einen wichtigen Beitrag leisten, wenn es um die Frage geht, wie Mitarbeiter unterst{\"u}tzt und zu Lernprozessen angeregt werden k{\"o}nnen. Die Identifizierung von lern- und leistungsf{\"o}rderlichen Zielstrukturen der Arbeitsumgebung w{\"u}rde wertvolle Ansatzpunkte f{\"u}r die Mitarbeiterentwicklung in der betrieblichen Praxis liefern. Im Rahmen von drei empirischen Studien wird der Relevanz der Zielorientierung im Arbeits-kontext nachgegangen. Neben der {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung eines ins Deutsche {\"u}bertragenen und angepassten Mess-instruments zur Erhebung der arbeitsplatzbezogenen Zielorientierung (Studie 1) steht vor allem die Untersuchung m{\"o}glicher Einfl{\"u}sse des Konstrukts auf arbeitsrelevante Variablen im Vordergrund, um f{\"o}rderliche Zielstrukturen zu identifizieren (Studie 1 \& 2). Dar{\"u}ber hinaus werden erstmalig m{\"o}gliche Person-Situation-Interaktionen in diesem Zusammenhang untersucht (Studie 2). Abschließend erfolgt eine Untersuchung m{\"o}glicher Antezedenten der arbeitsplatzbezogenen Zielorientierung, woraus sich erste wichtige Anhaltspunkte f{\"u}r Interventionsmaßnahmen am Arbeitsplatz ableiten lassen (Studie 3). Die Ergebnisse der Studien zeigen, dass insbesondere ein lernzielorientierter Arbeitsplatz f{\"o}rderlich f{\"u}r die untersuchten Variablen wie Lernerfolg, Leistung oder auch berufliche Selbstwirksamkeit ist. In Bezug auf die Interaktion von Person und Situation ergaben sich gemischte Befunde, die kein eindeutiges Interaktionsmuster aufweisen. Bei der Frage, wie ein lernzielorientierter Arbeitsplatz gef{\"o}rdert werden kann, erwies sich vor allem die Art und Weise, wie F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte mit Fehlern umgehen, als relevant. Die Studien liefern demnach wichtige erste Ans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r theoretische und praktische Implikationen, wie Mitarbeiter in Lern- und Leistungsprozessen unterst{\"u}tzt werden k{\"o}nnen.},
  subject      = {Handlung},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Saverschek2010,
  author    = {Saverschek, Nicole},
  title     = {The influence of the symbiotic fungus on foraging decisions in leaf-cutting ants - Individual behavior and collective patterns},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-52087},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Foraging behavior is a particularly fascinating topic within the studies of social insects. Decisions made by individuals have effects not only on the individual level, but on the colony level as well. Social information available through foraging in a group modulates individual preferences and shapes the foraging pattern of a colony. Identifying parameters influencing foraging behavior in leaf-cutting ants is especially intriguing because they do not harvest for themselves, but for their symbiotic fungus which in turn influences their plant preferences after the incorporation of the substrate. To learn about the substrates' unsuitability for the fungus, ants need to be able to identify the incorporated substrate and associate it with detrimental effects on the fungus. Odor is an important plant characteristic known to be used as recognition key outside the nest in the context of foraging. Chapter 1 shows that foragers are able to recall information about the unsuitability of a substrate through odor alone and consequently reject the substrate, which leads to the conclusion that inside the nest, odor might be enough to indentify incorporated substrate. Identification of plant species is a key factor in the foraging success of leaf-cutting ants as they harvest a multitude of different plant species in a diverse environment and host plant availability and suitability changes throughout the year. Fixed plant preferences of individuals through innate tendencies are therefore only one factor influencing foraging decisions. On the individual as well as the colony level, foraging patterns are flexible and a result of an intricate interplay between the different members involved in the harvesting process: foragers, gardeners and the symbiotic fungus. In chapter 2 I identified several conditions necessary for na{\"i}ve foragers to learn about the unsuitability of substrate inside the nest. In order to exchange of information about the unsuitability of a substrate, the plant in question must be present in the fungus garden. Foragers can learn without own foraging experience and even without experiencing the effects of the substrate on the fungus, solely through the presence of experienced gardeners. The presence of experienced foragers alone on the other hand is not enough to lower the acceptance of substrate by na{\"i}ve foragers in the presence of na{\"i}ve gardeners, even if experienced foragers make up the majority of the workforce inside the nest. Experienced foragers are also able to reverse their previous negative experience and start accepting the substrate again. The individual behavior of foragers and gardeners with different experiential backgrounds in the presence of suitable or unsuitable substrate inside the fungus chamber was investigated in chapter 3 to shed some light on possible mechanisms involved in the flow of information about substrate suitability from the fungus to the ants. Gardeners as well as foragers are involved in the leaf processing and treatment of the applied leaf patches on the fungus. If the plant material is unsuitable, significantly more ants treat the plant patches, but foragers are less active overall. Contacts between workers initiated by either gardeners or foragers occur significantly more frequent and last longer if the substrate is unsuitable. Even though experienced gardeners increase na{\"i}ve foragers' contact rates and duration with other workers in the presence of suitable plant patches, na{\"i}ve foragers show no differences in the handling of the plant patches. This suggests that foragers gain information about plant suitability not only indirectly through the gardening workers, but might also be able to directly evaluate the effects of the substrate on the fungus themselves. Outside the nest, foragers influence each other the trail (chapter 4). Foraging in a group and the presence of social information is a decisive factor in the substrate choice of the individual and leads to a distinct and consentaneous colony response when encountering unfamiliar or unsuitable substrates. As leaf-cutting ants harvest different plant species simultaneously on several trails, foragers gain individual experiences concerning potential host plants. Preferences might vary among individuals of the same colony to the degree that foragers on the same trail perceive a certain substrate as either suitable or unsuitable. If the majority of foragers on the trail perceives one of the currently harvested substrates as unsuitable, na{\"i}ve foragers lower their acceptance within 4 hours. In the absence of a cue in the fungus, na{\"i}ve foragers harvesting by themselves still eventually (within 6 hours) reject the substrate as they encounter experienced gardeners during visits to the nest within foraging bouts. As foraging trails can be up to 100 m long and foragers spend a considerable amount of time away from the nest, learning indirectly from experienced foragers on the trail accelerates the distribution of information about substrate suitability. The level of rejection of a formerly unsuitable substrate after eight hours of foraging by na{\"i}ve foragers correlates with the average percentage of unladen experienced foragers active on the trail. This suggests that unladen experienced foragers might actively contact laden na{\"i}ve workers transmitting information about the unsuitability of the load they carry. Results from experiments were I observed individual laden foragers on their way back to the nest backed up this assumption as individuals were antennated and received bites into the leaf disk they carried. Individuals were contacted significantly more often by nestmates that perceived the carried leaf disk as unsuitable due to previous experience than by nestmates without this experience (chapter 6). Leaf-cutting ants constantly evaluate, learn and re-evaluate the suitability of harvested substrate and adjust their foraging activity accordingly. The importance of the different sources of information within the colony and their effect on the foraging pattern of the colony depend on the presence or absence of each of them as e.g. experienced foragers have a bigger influence on the plant preferences of na{\"i}ve foragers in the absence of a cue in the fungus garden.},
  subject      = {Blattschneiderameisen},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Saumweber2011,
  author    = {Saumweber, Timo},
  title     = {Mechanism of Learning and Plasticity in Larval Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-66354},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {According to a changing environment it is crucial for animals to make experience and learn about it. Sensing, integrating and learning to associate different kinds of modalities enables animals to expect future events and to adjust behavior in the way, expected as the most profitable. Complex processes as memory formation and storage make it necessary to investigate learning and memory on different levels. In this context Drosophila melanogaster represents a powerful model organism. As the adult brain of the fly is still quite complex, I chose the third instar larva as model - the more simple the system, the easier to isolate single, fundamental principles of learning. In this thesis I addressed several kinds of questions on different mechanism of olfactory associative and synaptic plasiticity in Drosophila larvae. I focused on short-term memory throughout my thesis. First, investigating larval learning on behavioral level, I developed a one-odor paradigm for olfactory associative conditioning. This enables to estimate the learnability of single odors, reduces the complexity of the task and simplify analyses of "learning mutants". It further allows to balance learnability of odors for generalization-type experiments to describe the olfactory "coding space". Furthermore I could show that innate attractiveness and learnability can be dissociated and found finally that paired presentation of a given odor with reward increase performance, whereas unpaired presentations of these two stimuli decrease performance, indicating that larva are able to learn about the presence as well as about the absence of a reward. Second, on behavioral level, together with Thomas Niewalda and colleagues we focussed on salt processing in the context of choice, feeding and learning. Salt is required in several physiological processes, but can neither be synthesized nor stored. Various salt concentrations shift the valence from attraction to repulsion in reflexive behaviour. Interestingly, the reinforcing effect of salt in learning is shifted by more than one order of magnitude toward higher concentrations. Thus, the input pathways for gustatory behavior appear to be more sensitive than the ones supporting gustatory reinforcement, which is may be due to the dissociation of the reflexive and the reinforcing signalling pathways of salt. Third, in cooperation with Michael Schleyer we performed a series of behavioral gustatory, olfactory preference tests and larval learning experiments. Based on the available neuroanatomical and behavioral data we propose a model regarding chemosensory processing, odor-tastant memory trace formation and the 'decision' like process. It incorporates putative sites of interaction between olfactory and gustatory pathways during the establishment as well as behavioral expression of odor-tastant memory. We claim that innate olfactory behavior is responsive in nature and suggest that associative conditioned behavior is not a simple substitution like process, but driven more likely by the expectation of its outcome. Fourth, together with Birgit Michels and colleagues we investigated the cellular site and molecular mode of Synapsin, an evolutionarily conserved, presynaptic vesicular phosphoprotein and its action in larval learning. We confirmed a previously described learning impairment upon loss of Synapsin. We localized this Synapsin dependent memory trace in the mushroom bodies, a third-order "cortical" brain region, and could further show on molecular level, that Synapsin is as a downstream element of the AC-cAMP-PKA signalling cascade. This study provides a comprehensive chain of explanation from the molecular level to an associative behavioral change. Fifth, in the main part of my thesis I focused on molecular level on another synaptic protein, the Synapse associated protein of 47kDa (Sap47) and its role in larval behavior. As a member of a phylogenetically conserved gene family of hitherto unknown function. It is localized throughout the whole neuropil of larval brains and associated with presynaptic vesicles. Upon loss of Sap47 larvae exhibit normal sensory detection of the to-be-associated stimuli as well as normal motor performance and basic synaptic transmission. Interestingly, short-term plasticity is distorted and odorant-tastant associative learning ability is reduced. This defect in associative function could be rescued by restoring Sap47 expression. Therefore, this report is the first to suggest a function for Sap47 and specifically argues that Sap47 is required for synaptic as well as for behavioral plasticity in Drosophila larva. This prompts the question whether its homologs are required for synaptic and behavioral plasticity also in other species. Further in the last part of my thesis I contributed to the study of Ayse Yarali. Her central topic was the role of the White protein in punishment and relief learning in adult flies. Whereas stimuli that precede shock during training are subsequently avoided as predictors for punishment, stimuli that follow shock during training are later on approached, as they predict relief. Concerning the loss of White we report that pain-relief learning as well as punishment learning is changed. My contribution was a comparison between wild type and the white1118 mutant larvae in odor-reward learning. It turned out that a loss of White has no effect on larval odorant-tastant learning. This study, regarding painrelief learning provides the very first hints concerning the genetic determinants of this form of learning.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{RuedtvonCollenberg2021,
  author    = {R{\"u}dt von Collenberg, Cora Freifrau},
  title     = {The role of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and learning},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-20664},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-206646},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ciliary neurotrophic factor (Cntf) acts as a differentiation and survival factor for different types of neurons and glial cells. It is expressed by peripheral Schwann cells and astrocytes in the central nervous system and mediates its effects via a receptor complex involving CntfRα, LifRß and gp130, leading to downstream activation of Stat3. Recent studies by our group have shown that Cntf modulates neuronal microtubule dynamics via Stat3/stathmin interaction. In a mouse model for motor neuron disease, i.e. pmn, Cntf is able to rescue axonal degeneration through Stat3/stathmin signaling. While these findings suggest a role of Cntf in controlling axonal functions in the neuromuscular system, additional data indicate that Cntf might also play a role in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Electrophysiological recordings in hippocampal organotypic cultures and acute slices revealed a deficit in long-term potentiation (LTP) in Cntf -/- mice. This deficit was rescued by 24 h stimulation with Cntf, combined with an acute application of Cntf during LTP-measurements indicating that Cntf is both necessary and sufficient for hippocampal LTP, and possibly synaptic plasticity. Therefore, Cntf knockout mice were investigated to elucidate this possible role of Cntf in hippocampal LTP and synaptic plasticity. First, we validated the presence of Cntf in the target tissue: in the hippocampus, Cntf was localized in Gfap-positive astrocytes surrounding small blood vessels in the fissure and in meningeal areas close to the dentate gyrus. Laser micro-dissection and qPCR analysis showed a similar distribution of Cntf-coding mRNA validating the obtained immunofluorescent results. Despite the strong LTP deficit in organotypic cultures, in vivo behavior of Cntf -/- mice regarding hippocampus-dependent learning and anxiety-related paradigms was largely inconspicuous. However, western blot analysis of hippocampal organotypic cultures revealed a significant reduction of pStat3 levels in Cntf -/- cultures under baseline conditions, which in turn were elevated upon Cntf stimulation. In order to resolve and examine synaptic structures we turned to in vitro analysis of cultured hippocampal neurons which indicated that pStat3 is predominantly located in the presynapse. In line with these findings, presynapses of Cntf -/- cultures were reduced in size and when in contact to astrocytes, contained less pStat3 immunoreactivity compared to presynapses in wildtype cultures. In conclusion, our findings hypothesize that despite of a largely inconspicuous behavioral phenotype of Cntf -/- mice, Cntf appears to have an influence on pStat3 levels at hippocampal synapses. In a next step these two key questions need to be addressed experimentally: 1) is there a compensatory mechanism by members of the Cntf family, possibly downstream of pStat3, which explains the in vivo behavioral results of Cntf -/- mice and can likewise account for the largely inconspicuous phenotype in CNTF-deficient humans? 2) How exactly does Cntf influence LTP through Stat3 signaling? To unravel the underlying mechanism further experiments should therefore investigate whether microtubule dynamics downstream of Stat3 and stathmin signaling are involved in the Cntf-induced modulation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, similar to as it was shown in motoneurons.},
  subject      = {Hippocampus},
  language  = {en}
}