@phdthesis{Tupak2013,
  author    = {Tupak, Sara},
  title     = {Modulators of Prefrontal Fear Network Function: An Integrative View},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85673},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Regulating our immediate feelings, needs, and urges is a task that we are faced with every day in our lives. The effective regulation of our emotions enables us to adapt to society, to deal with our environment, and to achieve long-term goals. Deficient emotion regulation, in contrast, is a common characteristic of many psychiatric and neurological conditions. Particularly anxiety disorders and subclinical states of increased anxiety are characterized by a range of behavioral, autonomic, and neural alterations impeding the efficient down-regulation of acute fear. Established fear network models propose a downstream prefrontal-amygdala circuit for the control of fear reactions but recent research has shown that there are a range of factors acting on this network. The specific prefrontal cortical networks involved in effective regulation and potential mediators and modulators are still a subject of ongoing research in both the animal and human model. The present research focused on the particular role of different prefrontal cortical regions during the processing of fear-relevant stimuli in healthy subjects. It is based on four studies, three of them investigating a different potential modulator of prefrontal top-down function and one directly challenging prefrontal regulatory processes. Summarizing the results of all four studies, it was shown that prefrontal functioning is linked to individual differences in state anxiety, autonomic flexibility, and genetic predisposition. The T risk allele of the neuropeptide S receptor gene, a recently suggested candidate gene for pathologically elevated anxiety, for instance, was associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activation to particularly fear-relevant stimuli. Furthermore, the way of processing has been found to crucially determine if regulatory processes are engaged at all and it was shown that anxious individuals display generally reduced prefrontal activation but may engage in regulatory processes earlier than non-anxious subjects. However, active manipulation of prefrontal functioning in healthy subjects did not lead to the typical behavioral and neural patterns observed in anxiety disorder patients suggesting that other subcortical or prefrontal structures can compensate for an activation loss in one specific region. Taken together, the current studies support prevailing theories of the central role of the prefrontal cortex for regulatory processes in response to fear-eliciting stimuli but point out that there are a range of both individual differences and peculiarities in experimental design that impact on or may even mask potential effects in neuroimaging research on fear regulation.},
  subject      = {Neurogenetik},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Andlauer2013,
  author    = {Andlauer, Till Felix Malte},
  title     = {Structural and Functional Diversity of Synapses in the Drosophila CNS},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85018},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Large-scale anatomical and functional analyses of the connectivity in both invertebrate and mammalian brains have gained intense attention in recent years. At the same time, the understanding of synapses on a molecular level still lacks behind. We have only begun to unravel the basic mechanisms of how the most important synaptic proteins regulate release and reception of neurotransmitter molecules, as well as changes of synaptic strength. Furthermore, little is known regarding the stoichiometry of presynaptic proteins at different synapses within an organism. An assessment of these characteristics would certainly promote our comprehension of the properties of different synapse types. Presynaptic proteins directly influence, for example, the probability of neurotransmitter release as well as mechanisms for short-term plasticity. We have examined the strength of expression of several presynaptic proteins at different synapse types in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster using immunohistochemistry. Clear differences in the relative abundances of the proteins were obvious on different levels: variations in staining intensities appeared from the neuropil to the synaptic level. In order to quantify these differences, we have developed a ratiometric analysis of antibody stainings. By application of this ratiometric method, we could assign average ratios of presynaptic proteins to different synapse populations in two central relays of the olfactory pathway. In this manner, synapse types could be characterized by distinct fingerprints of presynaptic protein ratios. Subsequently, we used the method for the analysis of aberrant situations: we reduced levels of Bruchpilot, a major presynaptic protein, and ablated different synapse or cell types. Evoked changes of ratio fingerprints were proportional to the modifications we had induced in the system. Thus, such ratio signatures are well suited for the characterization of synapses. In order to contribute to our understanding of both the molecular composition and the function of synapses, we also characterized a novel synaptic protein. This protein, Drep-2, is a member of the Dff family of regulators of apoptosis. We generated drep-2 mutants, which did not show an obvious misregulation of apoptosis. By contrast, Drep-2 was found to be a neuronal protein, highly enriched for example at postsynaptic receptor fields of the input synapses of the major learning centre of insects, the mushroom bodies. Flies mutant for drep-2 were viable but lived shorter than wildtypes. Basic synaptic transmission at both peripheral and central synapses was in normal ranges. However, drep-2 mutants showed a number of deficiencies in adaptive behaviours: adult flies were locomotor hyperactive and hypersensitive towards ethanol-induced sedation. Moreover, the mutant animals were heavily impaired in associative learning. In aversive olfactory conditioning, drep-2 mutants formed neither short-term nor anaesthesia-sensitive memories. We could demonstrate that Drep-2 is required in mushroom body intrinsic neurons for normal olfactory learning. Furthermore, odour-evoked calcium transients in these neurons, a prerequisite for learning, were reduced in drep-2 mutants. The impairment of the mutants in olfactory learning could be fully rescued by pharmacological application of an agonist to metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Quantitative mass spectrometry of Drep-2 complexes revealed that the protein is associated with a large number of translational repressors, among them the fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP. FMRP inhibits mGluR-mediated protein synthesis. Lack of this protein causes the fragile X syndrome, which constitutes the most frequent monogenic cause of autism. Examination of the performance of drep-2 mutants in courtship conditioning showed that the animals were deficient in both short- and long-term memory. Drep-2 mutants share these phenotypes with fmrp and mGluR mutants. Interestingly, drep-2; fmrp double mutants exhibited normal memory. Thus, we propose a model in which Drep-2 antagonizes FMRP in the regulation of mGluR-dependent protein synthesis. Our hypothesis is supported by the observation that impairments in synaptic plasticity can arise if mGluR signalling is imbalanced in either direction. We suggest that Drep-2 helps in establishing this balance.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Mishra2011,
  author    = {Mishra, Dushyant},
  title     = {The content of olfactory memory in larval Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-66316},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {An animal depends heavily on its sense of smell and its ability to form olfactory associations as this is crucial for its survival. This thesis studies in two parts about such associative olfactory learning in larval Drosophila. The first part deals with different aspects of odour processing while the second part is concerned with aspects related to memory and learning. Chapter I.1 highlights how odour intensities could be integrated into the olfactory percept of larval Drosophila. I first describe the dose-effect curves of learnability across odour intensities for different odours and then choose odour intensities from these curves such that larvae are trained at intermediate odour intensity, but are tested for retention with either that trained intermediate odour intensity, or with respectively HIGHer or LOWer intensities. I observe a specificity of retention for the trained intensity for all the odours used. Further I compare these findings with the case of adult Drosophila and propose a circuit level model of how such intensity coding comes about. Such intensity specificity of learning adds to appreciate the richness in 'content' of olfactory memory traces, and to define the demands on computational models of olfaction and olfactory learning. Chapter I.2 provides a behaviour-based estimate of odour similarity using four different types of experiments to yield a combined, task-independent estimate of perceived difference between odour-pairs. Further comparison of these perceived differences to published measures of physico- chemical difference reveals a weak correlation. Notable exceptions to this correlation are 3-octanol and benzaldehyde. Chapter I.3 shows for two odours (3-octanol and 1-octene-3-ol) that perceptual differences between these odours can either be ignored after non-discriminative training (generalization), or accentuated by odour-specific reinforcement (discrimination). Anosmic Or83b1 mutants have lost these faculties, indicating that this adaptive adjustment is taking place downstream of Or83b expressing sensory neurons. Chapter II.1 of this thesis deals with food supplementation with dried roots of Rhodiola rosea. This dose-dependently improves odour- reward associative function in larval Drosophila. Supplementing fly food with commercially available tablets or extracts, however, does not have a 'cognitive enhancing' effect, potentially enabling us to differentiate between the effective substances in the root versus these preparations. Thus Drosophila as a genetically tractable study case should now allow accelerated analyses of the molecular mechanism(s) that underlie this 'cognitive enhancement' conveyed by Rhodiola rosea. Chapter II.2 describes the role of Synapsin, an evolutionarily conserved presynaptic phosphoprotein using a combined behavioural and genetic approach and asks where and how, this protein affects functions in associative plasticity of larval Drosophila. This study shows that a Synapsin-dependent memory trace can be pinpointed to the mushroom bodies, a 'cortical' brain region of the insects. On the molecular level, data in this study assign Synapsin as a behaviourally- relevant effector of the AC-cAMP-PKA cascade.},
  subject      = {Drosophila},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Yarali2008,
  author    = {Yarali, Ayse},
  title     = {Aspects of predictive learning in the fruit fly},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-28741},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Past experience contributes to behavioural organization mainly via learning: Animals learn otherwise ordinary cues as predictors for biologically significant events. This thesis studies such predictive, associative learning, using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. I ask two main questions, which complement each other: One deals with the processing of those cues that are to be learned as predictors for an important event; the other one deals with the processing of the important event itself, which is to be predicted. Do fruit flies learn about combinations of olfactory and visual cues? I probe larval as well as adult fruit flies for the learning about combinations of olfactory and visual cues, using a so called 'biconditional discrimination' task: During training, one odour is paired with reinforcement only in light, but not in darkness; the other odour in turn is reinforced only in darkness, but not in light. Thus, neither the odours nor the visual conditions alone predict reinforcement, only combinations of both do. I find no evidence that either larval or adult fruit flies were to solve such task, speaking against a cross-talk between olfactory and visual modalities. Previous studies however suggest such cross-talk. To reconcile these results, I suggest classifying different kinds of interaction between sensory modalities, according to their site along the sensory-motor continuum: I consider an interaction 'truly' cross-modal, if it is between the specific features of the stimuli. I consider an interaction 'amodal' if it instead engages the behavioural tendencies or 'values' elicited by each stimulus. Such reasoning brings me to conclude that different behavioural tasks require different kinds of interaction between sensory modalities; whether a given kind of interaction will be found depends on the neuronal infrastructure, which is a function of the species and the developmental stage. Predictive learning of pain-relief in fruit flies Fruit flies build two opposing kinds of memory, based on an experience with electric shock: Those odours that precede shock during training are learned as predictors for punishment and are subsequently avoided; those odours that follow shock during training on the other hand are learned as signals for relief and are subsequently approached. I focus on such relief learning. I start with a detailed parametric analysis of relief learning, testing for reproducibility as well as effects of gender, repetition of training, odour identity, odour concentration and shock intensity. I also characterize how relief memories, once formed, decay. In addition, concerning the psychological mechanisms of relief learning, first, I show that relief learning establishes genuinely associative conditioned approach behaviour and second, I report that it is most likely not mediated by context associations. These results enable the following neurobiological analysis of relief learning; further, they will form in the future the basis for a mathematical model; finally, they will guide the researchers aiming at uncovering relief learning in other experimental systems. Next, I embark upon neurogenetic analysis of relief learning. First, I report that fruit flies mutant for the so called white gene build overall more 'negative' memories about an experience with electric shock. That is, in the white mutants, learning about the painful onset of shock is enhanced, whereas learning about the relieving offset of shock is diminished. As they are coherently affected, these two kinds of learning should be in a balance. The molecular mechanism of the effect of white on this balance remains unresolved. Finally, as a first step towards a neuronal circuit analysis of relief learning, I compare it to reward learning and punishment learning. I find that relief learning is distinct from both in terms of the requirement for biogenic amine signaling: Reward and punishment are respectively signalled by octopamine and dopamine, for relief learning, either of these seem dispensible. Further, I find no evidence for roles for two other biogenic amines, tyramine and serotonin in relief learning. Based on these findings I give directions for further research.},
  subject      = {Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Rister2008,
  author    = {Rister, Jens},
  title     = {Genetic dissection of peripheral pathways in the visual system of Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-25980},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Die visuellen Systeme von Vertebraten und Invertebraten weisen {\"A}hnlichkeiten in den ersten Schritten visueller Informationsverarbeitung auf. Im menschlichen Gehirn werden zum Beispiel die Modalit{\"a}ten Farbe, Form und Bewegung separat in parallelen neuronalen Pfaden verarbeitet. Dieses grundlegende Merkmal findet sich auch bei der Fliege Drosophila melanogaster, welche eine {\"a}hnliche Trennung in farbsensitive und (farbenblinde) bewegungssensitive Pfade aufweist, die durch zwei verschiedene Gruppen von Photorezeptoren (dem R1-6 und dem R7/8 System) determiniert werden. Fliegen haben ein hoch organisiertes visuelles System, welches durch die repetitive, retinotope Organisation von vier Neuropilen charakterisiert ist: Dies sind die Lamina, die Medulla, die Lobula und die Lobulaplatte. Jedes einzelne besteht aus Kolumnen, die denselben Satz von Nervenzellen enthalten. In der Lamina formen Axonb{\"u}ndel von sechs Photorezeptoren R1-6, die auf denselben Bildpunkt blicken, S{\"a}ulen, die als Cartridges bezeichnet werden. Diese sind die funktionellen visuellen „sampling units" und sind mit vier Typen von Interneuronen erster Ordnung assoziiert, die von R1-6 den gleichen Input erhalten: L1, L2, L3 und die Amakrinzellen (amc, mit ihrem postsynaptischen Partner T1). Diese stellen parallele Pfade dar, die auf anatomischer Ebene im Detail untersucht wurden; jedoch ist wenig {\"u}ber ihre funktionelle Rolle bei der Verarbeitung f{\"u}r das Verhalten relevanter Information bekannt, z.B. hinsichtlich der Blickstabilisierung, der visuellen Kurskontrolle oder der Fixation von Objekten. Die Verf{\"u}gbarkeit einer Vielfalt von neurogenetischen Werkzeugen f{\"u}r die Struktur-Funktionsanalyse bei Drosophila erm{\"o}glicht es, erste Schritte in Richtung einer genetischen Zerlegung des visuellen Netzwerks zu unternehmen, das Bewegungs- und Positionssehen vermittelt. In diesem Zusammenhang erwies sich die Wahl des Effektors als entscheidend. {\"U}berraschenderweise wurde festgestellt, dass das clostridiale Tetanus-Neurotoxin die Photorezeptorsynapsen adulter Drosophila Fliegen nicht blockiert, hingegen irreversible Sch{\"a}den bei Expression w{\"a}hrend deren Entwicklung verursacht. Aus diesem Grund wurde das dominant-negative shibire Allel shits1, welches sich als geeigneter erwies, zur Blockierung der Lamina Interneurone verwendet, um die Notwendigkeit der jeweiligen Pfade zu analysieren. Um festzustellen, ob letztere auch hinreichend f{\"u}r das gleiche Verhalten waren, wurde f{\"u}r die umgekehrte Strategie die Tatsache ausgenutzt, daß die Lamina Interneurone Histaminrezeptoren exprimieren, die vom ort Gen kodiert werden. Die spezifische Rettung der ort Funktion in definierten Pfaden im mutanten Hintergrund erm{\"o}glichte festzustellen, ob sie f{\"u}r eine bestimmte Funktion hinreichend waren. Diese neurogenetischen Methoden wurden mit der optomotorischen Reaktion und dem objektinduzierten Orientierungsverhalten als Verhaltensmaß kombiniert, um folgende Fragen innerhalb dieser Doktorarbeit zu beantworten: (a) Welche Pfade stellen einen Eingang in elementare Bewegungsdetektoren dar und sind notwendig und/oder hinreichend f{\"u}r die Detektion gerichteter Bewegung? (b) Gibt es Pfade, die spezifisch Reaktionen auf unidirektionale Bewegung vermitteln? (c) Welche Pfade sind notwendig und/oder hinreichend f{\"u}r das objektinduzierte Orientierungsverhalten? Einige grundlegende Eigenschaften des visuellen Netzwerks konnten dabei aufgedeckt werden: Die zwei zentralen Cartridge Pfade, die von den großen Monopolarzellen L1 und L2 repr{\"a}sentiert werden, haben eine Schl{\"u}sselfunktion bei der Bewegungsdetektion. {\"U}ber ein breites Spektrum von Reizbedingungen hinweg sind die beiden Subsysteme redundant und k{\"o}nnen Bewegung unabh{\"a}ngig voneinander verarbeiten. Um eine Beeintr{\"a}chtigung des Systems festzustellen, wenn nur einer der beiden Pfade intakt ist, muß dieses an die Grenzen seiner Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit gebracht werden. Bei niedrigem Signal/Rauschverh{\"a}ltnis, d.h. bei geringem Musterkontrast oder geringer Hintergrundbeleuchtung, hat der L2 Pfad eine h{\"o}here Sensitivit{\"a}t. Bei mittlerem Musterkontrast sind beide Pfade auf die Verarbeitung unidirektionaler Bewegung in entgegengesetzten Reizrichtungen spezialisiert. Im Gegensatz dazu sind weder der L3, noch der amc/T1 Pfad notwendig oder hinreichend f{\"u}r die Detektion von Bewegungen. W{\"a}hrend der erstere Positionsinformation f{\"u}r Orientierungsverhalten zu verarbeiten scheint, nimmt der letztere eine modulatorische Rolle bei mittlerem Kontrast ein. Es stellte sich heraus, daß das Orientierungsverhalten noch robuster als das Bewegungssehen ist und m{\"o}glicherweise auf einem weniger komplizierten Mechanismus beruht, da dieser keinen nichtlinearen Vergleich der Signale benachbarter visueller „sampling units" ben{\"o}tigt. Die Fixation von Objekten setzt nicht grunds{\"a}tzlich das Bewegungssehen voraus, allerdings verbessert die Detektion von Bewegung die Fixation von Landmarken, im besonderen, wenn diese schmal sind oder einen geringen Kontrast aufweisen.},
  subject      = {Genetik},
  language  = {en}
}