@article{RovitusoDuffySchroeteretal.2015, author = {Rovituso, Damiano M. and Duffy, Catharina E. and Schroeter, Michael and Kaiser, Claudia C. and Kleinschnitz, Christoph and Bayas, Antonios and Elsner, Rebecca and Kuerten, Stefanie}, title = {The brain antigen-specific B cell response correlates with glatiramer acetate responsiveness in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {5}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, number = {14265}, doi = {10.1038/srep14265}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-148172}, year = {2015}, abstract = {B cells have only recently begun to attract attention in the immunopathology of multiple sclerosis (MS). Suitable markers for the prediction of treatment success with immunomodulatory drugs are still missing. Here we evaluated the B cell response to brain antigens in n = 34 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients treated with glatiramer acetate (GA) using the enzyme-linked immunospot technique (ELISPOT). Our data demonstrate that patients can be subdivided into responders that show brain-specific B cell reactivity in the blood and patients without this reactivity. Only in patients that classified as B cell responders, there was a significant positive correlation between treatment duration and the time since last relapse in our study. This correlation was GA-specific because it was absent in a control group that consisted of interferon-\(\beta\) (IFN-\(\beta\))-treated RRMS patients (n = 23). These data suggest that GA has an effect on brain-reactive B cells in a subset of patients and that only this subset benefits from treatment. The detection of brain-reactive B cells is likely to be a suitable tool to identify drug responders.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerGirardHopfneretal.2016, author = {M{\"u}ller, Stefanie H. and Girard, Simon L. and Hopfner, Franziska and Merner, Nancy D. and Bourassa, Cynthia V. and Lorenz, Delia and Clark, Lorraine N. and Tittmann, Lukas and Soto-Ortolaza, Alexandra I. and Klebe, Stephan and Hallett, Mark and Schneider, Susanne A. and Hodgkinson, Colin A. and Lieb, Wolfgang and Wszolek, Zbigniew K. and Pendziwiat, Manuela and Lorenzo-Betancor, Oswaldo and Poewe, Werner and Ortega-Cubero, Sara and Seppi, Klaus and Rajput, Alex and Hussl, Anna and Rajput, Ali H. and Berg, Daniela and Dion, Patrick A. and Wurster, Isabel and Shulman, Joshua M. and Srulijes, Karin and Haubenberger, Dietrich and Pastor, Pau and Vilari{\~n}o-G{\"u}ell, Carles and Postuma, Ronald B. and Bernard, Genevi{\`e}ve and Ladwig, Karl-Heinz and Dupr{\´e}, Nicolas and Jankovic, Joseph and Strauch, Konstantin and Panisset, Michel and Winkelmann, Juliane and Testa, Claudia M. and Reischl, Eva and Zeuner, Kirsten E. and Ross, Owen A. and Arzberger, Thomas and Chouinard, Sylvain and Deuschl, G{\"u}nther and Louis, Elan D. and Kuhlenb{\"a}umer, Gregor and Rouleau, Guy A.}, title = {Genome-wide association study in essential tremor identifies three new loci}, series = {Brain}, volume = {139}, journal = {Brain}, doi = {10.1093/brain/aww242}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186541}, pages = {3163-3169}, year = {2016}, abstract = {We conducted a genome-wide association study of essential tremor, a common movement disorder characterized mainly by a postural and kinetic tremor of the upper extremities. Twin and family history studies show a high heritability for essential tremor. The molecular genetic determinants of essential tremor are unknown. We included 2807 patients and 6441 controls of European descent in our two-stage genome-wide association study. The 59 most significantly disease-associated markers of the discovery stage were genotyped in the replication stage. After Bonferroni correction two markers, one (rs10937625) located in the serine/threonine kinase STK32B and one (rs17590046) in the transcriptional coactivator PPARGC1A were associated with essential tremor. Three markers (rs12764057, rs10822974, rs7903491) in the cell-adhesion molecule CTNNA3 were significant in the combined analysis of both stages. The expression of STK32B was increased in the cerebellar cortex of patients and expression quantitative trait loci database mining showed association between the protective minor allele of rs10937625 and reduced expression in cerebellar cortex. We found no expression differences related to disease status or marker genotype for the other two genes. Replication of two lead single nucleotide polymorphisms of previous small genome-wide association studies (rs3794087 in SLC1A2, rs9652490 in LINGO1) did not confirm the association with essential tremor.}, language = {en} } @article{IsaiasMarzeganPezzolietal.2012, author = {Isaias, Ioannis U. and Marzegan, Alberto and Pezzoli, Gianni and Marotta, Giorgio and Canesi, Margherita and Biella, Gabriele E. M. and Volkmann, Jens and Cavallari, Paolo}, title = {A role for locus coeruleus in Parkinson tremor}, series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, number = {179}, doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2011.00179}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133955}, year = {2012}, abstract = {We analyzed rest tremor, one of the etiologically most elusive hallmarks of Parkinson disease(PD), in 12 consecutive PD patients during a specific task activating the locus coeruleus (LC) to investigate a putative role of noradrenaline (NA) in tremor generation and suppression. Clinical diagnosis was confirmed in all subjects by reduced dopamine reuptake transporter (DAT) binding values investigated by single photon computed tomography imaging (SPECT) with [\(^{123}\)I] N-\(\omega\)-fluoropropyl-2 \(\beta\)-carbomethoxy-3 \(\beta\)-(4-iodophenyl) tropane (FP-CIT). The intensity of tremor (i.e., the power of Electromyography [EMG] signals), but not its frequency, significantly increased during the task. In six subjects, tremor appeared selectively during the task. In a second part of the study, we retrospectively reviewed SPECT with FP-CIT data and confirmed the lack of correlation between dopaminergic loss and tremor by comparing DAT binding values of 82 PD subjects with bilateral tremor (n = 27), unilateral tremor (n = 22), and no tremor (n = 33). This study suggests a role of the LC in Parkinson tremor.}, language = {en} } @article{BrumbergSchroeterBlazhenetsetal.2020, author = {Brumberg, Joachim and Schr{\"o}ter, Nils and Blazhenets, Ganna and Frings, Lars and Volkmann, Jens and Lapa, Constantin and Jost, Wolfgang H. and Isaias, Ioannis U. and Meyer, Philipp T.}, title = {Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism: a head-to-head comparison of FDG PET and MIBG scintigraphy}, series = {NPJ Parkinsons Disease}, volume = {6}, journal = {NPJ Parkinsons Disease}, doi = {10.1038/s41531-020-00141-y}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230675}, year = {2020}, abstract = {[\(^{18}\)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and [\(^{123}\)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy may contribute to the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative parkinsonism. To identify the superior method, we retrospectively evaluated 54 patients with suspected neurodegenerative parkinsonism, who were referred for FDG PET and MIBG scintigraphy. Two investigators visually assessed FDG PET scans using an ordinal 6-step score for disease-specific patterns of Lewy body diseases (LBD) or atypical parkinsonism (APS) and assigned the latter to the subgroups multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), or corticobasal syndrome. Regions-of-interest analysis on anterior planar MIBG images served to calculate the heart-to-mediastinum ratio. Movement disorder specialists blinded to imaging results established clinical follow-up diagnosis by means of guideline-derived case vignettes. Clinical follow-up (1.7 +/- 2.3 years) revealed the following diagnoses: n = 19 LBD (n = 17 Parkinson's disease [PD], n = 1 PD dementia, and n = 1 dementia with Lewy bodies), n = 31 APS (n = 28 MSA, n = 3 PSP), n = 3 non-neurodegenerative parkinsonism; n = 1 patient could not be diagnosed and was excluded. Receiver operating characteristic analyses for discriminating LBD vs. non-LBD revealed a larger area under the curve for FDG PET than for MIBG scintigraphy at statistical trend level for consensus rating (0.82 vs. 0.69, p = 0.06; significant for investigator \#1: 0.83 vs. 0.69, p = 0.04). The analysis of PD vs. MSA showed a similar difference (0.82 vs. 0.69, p = 0.11; rater \#1: 0.83 vs. 0.69, p = 0.07). Albeit the notable differences in diagnostic performance did not attain statistical significance, the authors consider this finding clinically relevant and suggest that FDG PET, which also allows for subgrouping of APS, should be preferred.}, language = {en} }