@article{DotterweichTowerBrandletal.2016, author = {Dotterweich, Julia and Tower, Robert J. and Brandl, Andreas and M{\"u}ller, Marc and Hofbauer, Lorenz C. and Beilhack, Andreas and Ebert, Regina and Gl{\"u}er, Claus C. and Tiwari, Sanjay and Sch{\"u}tze, Norbert and Jakob, Franz}, title = {The KISS1 Receptor as an In Vivo Microenvironment Imaging Biomarker of Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {11}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0155087}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146960}, pages = {e0155087}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematological diseases and is characterized by an aberrant proliferation of plasma cells within the bone marrow. As a result of crosstalk between cancer cells and the bone microenvironment, bone homeostasis is disrupted leading to osteolytic lesions and poor prognosis. Current diagnostic strategies for myeloma typically rely on detection of excess monoclonal immunoglobulins or light chains in the urine or serum. However, these strategies fail to localize the sites of malignancies. In this study we sought to identify novel biomarkers of myeloma bone disease which could target the malignant cells and/or the surrounding cells of the tumor microenvironment. From these studies, the KISS1 receptor (KISS1R), a G-protein-coupled receptor known to play a role in the regulation of endocrine functions, was identified as a target gene that was upregulated on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) when co-cultured with myeloma cells. To determine the potential of this receptor as a biomarker, in vitro and in vivo studies were performed with the KISS1R ligand, kisspeptin, conjugated with a fluorescent dye. In vitro microscopy showed binding of fluorescently-labeled kisspeptin to both myeloma cells as well as MSCs under direct co-culture conditions. Next, conjugated kisspeptin was injected into immune-competent mice containing myeloma bone lesions. Tumor-burdened limbs showed increased peak fluorescence compared to contralateral controls. These data suggest the utility of the KISS1R as a novel biomarker for multiple myeloma, capable of targeting both tumor cells and host cells of the tumor microenvironment.}, language = {en} } @article{EbertJakobMeissnerWeigletal.2014, author = {Ebert, Regina and Jakob, Franz and Meissner-Weigl, Jutta and Zeck, Sabine and M{\"a}{\"a}tt{\"a}, Jorma and Auriola, Seppo and de Sousa, Sofia Coimbra and Mentrup, Birgit and Graser, Stephanie and Rachner, Tilman D. and Hofbauer, Lorenz C.}, title = {Probenecid as a sensitizer of bisphosphonate-mediated effects in breast cancer cells}, doi = {10.1186/1476-4598-13-265}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-111174}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background: Anti-resorptive bisphosphonates (BP) are used for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone metastases. Clinical studies indicated a benefit in survival and tumor relapse in subpopulations of breast cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid, thus stimulating the debate about its anti-tumor activity. Amino-bisphosphonates in nM concentrations inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase leading to accumulation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and the ATP/ pyrophosphate adduct ApppI, which induces apoptosis in osteoclasts. For anti-tumor effects μM concentrations are needed and a sensitizer for bisphosphonate effects would be beneficial in clinical anti-tumor applications. We hypothesized that enhancing intracellular pyrophosphate accumulation via inhibition of probenecid-sensitive channels and transporters would sensitize tumor cells for bisphosphonates anti-tumor efficacy. Methods: MDA-MB-231, T47D and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were treated with BP (zoledronic acid, risedronate, ibandronate, alendronate) and the pyrophosphate channel inhibitors probenecid and novobiocin. We determined cell viability and caspase 3/7 activity (apoptosis), accumulation of IPP and ApppI, expression of ANKH, PANX1, ABCC1, SLC22A11, and the zoledronic acid target gene and tumor-suppressor KLF2. Results: Treatment of MDA-MB-231 with BP induced caspase 3/7 activity, with zoledronic acid being the most effective. In MCF-7 and T47D either BP markedly suppressed cell viability with only minor effects on apoptosis. Co-treatment with probenecid enhanced BP effects on cell viability, IPP/ApppI accumulation as measurable in MCF-7 and T47D cells, caspase 3/7 activity and target gene expression. Novobiocin co-treatment of MDA-MB-231 yielded identical results on viability and apoptosis compared to probenecid, rendering SLC22A family members as candidate modulators of BP effects, whereas no such evidence was found for ANKH, ABCC1 and PANX1. Conclusions: In summary, we demonstrate effects of various bisphosphonates on caspase 3/7 activity, cell viability and expression of tumor suppressor genes in breast cancer cells. Blocking probenecid- and novobiocin-sensitive channels and transporters enhances BP anti-tumor effects and renders SLC22A family members good candidates as BP modulators. Further studies will have to unravel if treatment with such BP-sensitizers translates into preclinical and clinical efficacy.}, language = {en} }