@article{DietzWichelmannWunderetal.2012,
  author    = {Dietz, U. A. and Wichelmann, C. and Wunder, C. and Kauczok, J. and Spor, L. and Strauß, A. and Wildenauer, R. and Jurowich, C. and Germer, C. T.},
  title     = {Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia},
  series = {Hernia},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Hernia},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10029-012-0919-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126732},
  pages     = {451-460},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Purpose Once open abdomen therapy has succeeded, the problem of closing the abdominal wall must be addressed. We present a new four-stage procedure involving the application of a two-component mesh and vacuum conditioning for abdominal wall closure of even large defects. The aim is to prevent the development of a giant ventral hernia and the eventual need for the repair of the abdominal wall. Methods Nineteen of 62 patients treated by open abdomen over a two-year period could not receive primary abdominal wall closure. To achieve closure in these patients, we applied the following four-stage procedure: stage 1: abdominal damage control and conditioning of the abdominal wall; stage 2: attachment of a tailored two-component mesh of polyglycolic acid (PGA) and large pore polypropylene (PP) in intraperitoneal position (IPOM) plus placement of a vacuum bandage; stage 3: vacuum therapy for 3-4 weeks to allow granulation of the mesh and optimization of dermatotraction; stage 4: final skin suture. During stage 3, eligible patients were weaned from respirator and mobilized. Results The abdominal wall gap in the 19 patients ranged in size from 240 cm2 to more than 900 cm2. An average of 3.44 vacuum dressing changes over 19 days were required to achieve 60-100 \% granulation of the surface area, so final skin suture could be made. Already in stage 3, 14 patients (73.68 \%) could be weaned from respirator an average of 6.78 days after placement of the two-component mesh; 6 patients (31.57 \%) could be mobilized on the edge of the bed and/or to a bedside chair after an average of 13 days. No mesh-related hematomas, seromas, or intestinal fistulas were observed. Conclusion The four-stage procedure presented here is a viable option for achieving abdominal wall closure in patients treated with open abdomen, enabling us to avoid the development of planned giant ventral hernias. It has few complications and has the special advantage of allowing mobilization of the patients before final skin closure. Long-term course in a large number of patients must still confirm this result.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DietzWichelmannWunderetal.2012,
  author    = {Dietz, U. A. and Wichelmann, C. and Wunder, C. and Kauczok, J. and Spor, L. and Strauß, A. and Wildenauer, R. and Jurowich, C. and Germer, C. T.},
  title     = {Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia},
  series = {Hernia},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Hernia},
  number    = {4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-124686},
  pages     = {451-460},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Purpose Once open abdomen therapy has succeeded, the problem of closing the abdominal wall must be addressed. We present a new four-stage procedure involving the application of a two-component mesh and vacuum conditioning for abdominal wall closure of even large defects. The aim is to prevent the development of a giant ventral hernia and the eventual need for the repair of the abdominal wall. Methods Nineteen of 62 patients treated by open abdomen over a two-year period could not receive primary abdominal wall closure. To achieve closure in these patients, we applied the following four-stage procedure: stage 1: abdominal damage control and conditioning of the abdominal wall; stage 2: attachment of a tailored two-component mesh of polyglycolic acid (PGA) and large pore polypropylene (PP) in intraperitoneal position (IPOM) plus placement of a vacuum bandage; stage 3: vacuum therapy for 3-4 weeks to allow granulation of the mesh and optimization of dermatotraction; stage 4: final skin suture. During stage 3, eligible patients were weaned from respirator and mobilized. Results The abdominal wall gap in the 19 patients ranged in size from 240 cm2 to more than 900 cm2. An average of 3.44 vacuum dressing changes over 19 days were required to achieve 60-100 \% granulation of the surface area, so final skin suture could be made. Already in stage 3, 14 patients (73.68 \%) could be weaned from respirator an average of 6.78 days after placement of the two-component mesh; 6 patients (31.57 \%) could be mobilized on the edge of the bed and/or to a bedside chair after an average of 13 days. No mesh-related hematomas, seromas, or intestinal fistulas were observed. Conclusion The four-stage procedure presented here is a viable option for achieving abdominal wall closure in patients treated with open abdomen, enabling us to avoid the development of planned giant ventral hernias. It has few complications and has the special advantage of allowing mobilization of the patients before final skin closure. Long-term course in a large number of patients must still confirm this result.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuysomsCampanelliChampaultetal.2012,
  author    = {Muysoms, F. and Campanelli, G. and Champault, G. and DeBeaux, A. C. and Dietz, U. A. and Jeekel, J. and Klinge, U. and K{\"a}ckerling, F. and Mandala, M. and Montgomery, A. and Morales Conde, S. and Puppe, F. and Simmermacher, R. K. J. and Asmieta Aski, M. and Miserez, M.},
  title     = {EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair},
  series = {Hernia},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Hernia},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126691},
  pages     = {239-250},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND: Although the repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias is one of the most commonly performed operations, many aspects of their treatment are still under debate or poorly studied. In addition, there is a lack of good definitions and classifications that make the evaluation of studies and meta-analyses in this field of surgery difficult. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under the auspices of the board of the European Hernia Society and following the previously published classifications on inguinal and on ventral hernias, a working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of operations for ventral abdominal wall hernias. Development of such a registry involved reaching agreement about clear definitions and classifications on patient variables, surgical procedures and mesh materials used, as well as outcome parameters. The EuraHS working group (European registry for abdominal wall hernias) comprised of a multinational European expert panel with specific interest in abdominal wall hernias. Over five working group meetings, consensus was reached on definitions for the data to be recorded in the registry. RESULTS: A set of well-described definitions was made. The previously reported EHS classifications of hernias will be used. Risk factors for recurrences and co-morbidities of patients were listed. A new severity of comorbidity score was defined. Post-operative complications were classified according to existing classifications as described for other fields of surgery. A new 3-dimensional numerical quality-of-life score, EuraHS-QoL score, was defined. An online platform is created based on the definitions and classifications, which can be used by individual surgeons, surgical teams or for multicentre studies. A EuraHS website is constructed with easy access to all the definitions, classifications and results from the database. CONCLUSION: An online platform for registration and outcome measurement of abdominal wall hernia repairs with clear definitions and classifications is offered to the surgical community. It is hoped that this registry could lead to better evidence-based guidelines for treatment of abdominal wall hernias based on hernia variables, patient variables, available hernia repair materials and techniques.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuysomsCampanelliChampaultetal.2012,
  author    = {Muysoms, F. and Campanelli, G. and Champault, G. G. and DeBeaux, A. C. and Dietz, U. A. and Jeekel, J. and Klinge, U. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Mandala, V. and Montgomery, A. and Morales Conde, S. and Puppe, F. and Simmermacher, R. K. J. and Śmietański, M. and Miserez, M.},
  title     = {EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair},
  series = {Hernia},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Hernia},
  number    = {3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-124728},
  pages     = {239-250},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background Although the repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias is one of the most commonly performed operations, many aspects of their treatment are still under debate or poorly studied. In addition, there is a lack of good definitions and classifications that make the evaluation of studies and meta-analyses in this field of surgery difficult. Materials and methods Under the auspices of the board of the European Hernia Society and following the previously published classifications on inguinal and on ventral hernias, a working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of operations for ventral abdominal wall hernias. Development of such a registry involved reaching agreement about clear definitions and classifications on patient variables, surgical procedures and mesh materials used, as well as outcome parameters. The EuraHS working group (European registry for abdominal wall hernias) comprised of a multinational European expert panel with specific interest in abdominal wall hernias. Over five working group meetings, consensus was reached on definitions for the data to be recorded in the registry. Results A set of well-described definitions was made. The previously reported EHS classifications of hernias will be used. Risk factors for recurrences and co-morbidities of patients were listed. A new severity of comorbidity score was defined. Post-operative complications were classified according to existing classifications as described for other fields of surgery. A new 3-dimensional numerical quality-of-life score, EuraHS-QoL score, was defined. An online platform is created based on the definitions and classifications, which can be used by individual surgeons, surgical teams or for multicentre studies. A EuraHS website is constructed with easy access to all the definitions, classifications and results from the database. Conclusion An online platform for registration and outcome measurement of abdominal wall hernia repairs with clear definitions and classifications is offered to the surgical community. It is hoped that this registry could lead to better evidence-based guidelines for treatment of abdominal wall hernias based on hernia variables, patient variables, available hernia repair materials and techniques.},
  language  = {en}
}