@article{RiedmeierDecarolisHaubitzetal.2021, author = {Riedmeier, Maria and Decarolis, Boris and Haubitz, Imme and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Uttinger, Konstantin and B{\"o}rner, Kevin and Reibetanz, Joachim and Wiegering, Armin and H{\"a}rtel, Christoph and Schlegel, Paul-Gerhardt and Fassnacht, Martin and Wiegering, Verena}, title = {Adrenocortical carcinoma in childhood: a systematic review}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {13}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {21}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers13215266}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-248507}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Adrenocortical tumors are rare in children. This systematic review summarizes the published evidence on pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) to provide a basis for a better understanding of the disease, investigate new molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets, and define which patients may benefit from a more aggressive therapeutic approach. We included 137 studies with 3680 ACC patients (~65\% female) in our analysis. We found no randomized controlled trials, so this review mainly reflects retrospective data. Due to a specific mutation in the TP53 gene in ~80\% of Brazilian patients, that cohort was analyzed separately from series from other countries. Hormone analysis was described in 2569 of the 2874 patients (89\%). Most patients were diagnosed with localized disease, whereas 23\% had metastasis at primary diagnosis. Only 72\% of the patients achieved complete resection. In 334 children (23\%), recurrent disease was reported: 81\% — local recurrence, 19\% (n = 65) — distant metastases at relapse. Patients < 4 years old had a different distribution of tumor stages and hormone activity and better overall survival (p < 0.001). Although therapeutic approaches are typically multimodal, no consensus is available on effective standard treatments for advanced ACC. Thus, knowledge regarding pediatric ACC is still scarce and international prospective studies are needed to implement standardized clinical stratifications and risk-adapted therapeutic strategies.}, language = {en} } @article{WiegeringRiedmeierThompsonetal.2022, author = {Wiegering, Verena and Riedmeier, Maria and Thompson, Lester D. R. and Virgone, Calogero and Redlich, Antje and Kuhlen, Michaela and Gultekin, Melis and Yalcin, Bilgehan and Decarolis, Boris and H{\"a}rtel, Christoph and Schlegel, Paul-Gerhardt and Fassnacht, Martin and Timmermann, Beate}, title = {Radiotherapy for pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma - Review of the literature}, series = {Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology}, volume = {35}, journal = {Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology}, doi = {10.1016/j.ctro.2022.05.003}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300472}, pages = {56-63}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background and purpose Pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma (pACC) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Publications on radiotherapy (RT) are scarce. This review summarizes the current data on RT for pACC and possibly provides first evidence to justify its use in this setting. Materials and methods We searched the PubMed and Embase database for manuscripts regarding RT for pACC. Results We included 17 manuscripts reporting on 76 patients treated with RT, after screening 2961 references and 269 full articles. In addition, we added data of 4 unreported pACC patients treated by co-authors. All reports based on retrospective data. Median age at first diagnosis was 11.1 years (70\% female); 78\% of patients presented with hormonal activity. RT was mostly performed for curative intent (78\%). 88\% of RT were administered during primary therapy. The site of RT was predominantly the local tumor bed (76\%). Doses of RT ranged from 15 to 62 Gy (median 50 Gy). Information on target volumes or fractionation were lacking. Median follow-up was 6,9 years and 64\% of the patients died of disease, with 33\% alive without disease. In 16 of 48 patients with available follow-up data after adjuvant RT (33\%) no recurrence was reported and in 3 of 9 patients palliative RT seemed to induce some benefit for the patient. Conclusions Our first systematic review on RT for pACC provides too few data for any general recommendation, but adjuvant RT in patients with high risk might be considered. International collaborative studies are urgently needed to establish better evidence on the role of RT in this rare malignancy.}, language = {en} }