@article{SuetterlinPaapBabicetal.2012,
  author    = {S{\"u}tterlin, Stefan and Paap, Muirne C. S. and Babic, Stana and K{\"u}bler, Andrea and V{\"o}gele, Claus},
  title     = {Rumination and Age: Some Things Get Better},
  series = {Journal of Aging Research},
  volume    = {2012},
  journal   = {Journal of Aging Research},
  number    = {267327},
  doi       = {10.1155/2012/267327},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-124356},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Rumination has been defined as a mode of responding to distress that involves passively focusing one's attention on symptoms of distress without taking action. This dysfunctional response style intensifies depressed mood, impairs interpersonal problem solving, and leads to more pessimistic future perspectives and less social support. As most of these results were obtained from younger people, it remains unclear how age affects ruminative thinking. Three hundred members of the general public ranging in age from 15 to 87 years were asked about their ruminative styles using the Response Styles Questionnaire (RSQ), depression and satisfaction with life. A Mokken Scale analysis confirmed the two-factor structure of the RSQ with brooding and reflective pondering as subcomponents of rumination. Older participants (63 years and older) reported less ruminative thinking than other age groups. Life satisfaction was associated with brooding and highest for the earlier and latest life stages investigated in this study.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HerbertSuetterlin2012,
  author    = {Herbert, Cornelia and S{\"u}tterlin, Stefan},
  title     = {Do not respond! Doing the think/no-think and go/no-go tasks concurrently leads to memory impairment of unpleasant items during later recall},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-76028},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Previous research using neuroimaging methods proposed a link between mechanisms controlling motor response inhibition and suppression of unwanted memories.The present study investigated this hypothesis behaviorally by combining the think/no-think paradigm (TNT) with a go/no-go motor inhibition task. Participants first learned unpleasant cue-target pairs. Cue words were then presented as go or no-go items in the TNT. Participants' task was to respond to the cues and think of the target word aloud or to inhibit their response to the cue and the target word from coming to mind. Cued recall assessed immediately after the TNT revealed reduced recall performance for no-go targets compared to go targets or baseline cues not presented in the TNT. The results demonstrate that doing the no-think and no-go task concurrently leads to memory suppression of unpleasant items during later recall. Results are discussed in line with recent empirical research and theoretical positions.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}