@article{MuellerBrillHagenetal.2012,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Joachim and Brill, Stefan and Hagen, Rudolf and Moeltner, Alexander and Brockmeier, Steffi-Johanna and Stark, Thomas and Helbig, Silke and Maurer, Jan and Zahnert, Thomas and Zierhofer, Clemens and Nopp, Peter and Anderson, Ilona},
  title     = {Clinical Trial Results with the MED-EL Fine Structure Processing Coding Strategy in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users},
  series = {ORL},
  volume    = {74},
  journal   = {ORL},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {0301-1569},
  doi       = {10.1159/000337089},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-196396},
  pages     = {185-198},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Objectives: To assess the subjective and objective performance of the new fine structure processing strategy (FSP) compared to the previous generation coding strategies CIS+ and HDCIS. Methods: Forty-six adults with a minimum of 6 months of cochlear implant experience were included. CIS+, HDCIS and FSP were compared in speech perception tests in noise, pitch scaling and questionnaires. The randomized tests were performed acutely (interval 1) and again after 3 months of FSP experience (interval 3). The subjective evaluation included questionnaire 1 at intervals 1 and 3, and questionnaire 2 at interval 2, 1 month after interval 1. Results: Comparison between FSP and CIS+ showed that FSP performed at least as well as CIS+ in all speech perception tests, and outperformed CIS+ in vowel and monosyllabic word discrimination. Comparison between FSP and HDCIS showed that both performed equally well in all speech perception tests. Pitch scaling showed that FSP performed at least as well as HDCIS. With FSP, sound quality was at least as good and often better than with HDCIS. Conclusions: Results indicate that FSP performs better than CIS+ in vowel and monosyllabic word understanding. Subjective evaluation demonstrates strong user preferences for FSP when listening to speech and music.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GreiserGreiserAhrensetal.2012,
  author    = {Greiser, Eberhard M. and Greiser, Karin Halina and Ahrens, Wolfgang and Hagen, Rudolf and Lazszig, Roland and Maier, Heinz and Schick, Bernhard and Zenner, Hans Peter},
  title     = {Risk factors for nasal malignancies in German men: the South-German Nasal cancer study},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  number    = {506},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2407-12-506},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133365},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background: There are few studies of the effects of nasal snuff and environmental factors on the risk of nasal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the impact of using nasal snuff and of other risk factors on the risk of nasal cancer in German men. Methods: A population-based case-control study was conducted in the German Federal States of Bavaria and Baden-Wurttemberg. Tumor registries and ear, nose and throat departments provided access to patients born in 1926 or later. Results: Telephone interviews were conducted with 427 cases (mean age 62.1 years) and 2.401 population-based controls (mean age 60.8 years). Ever-use of nasal snuff was associated with an odds ratio (OR) for nasal cancer of 1.45 (95\% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-2.38) in the total study population, whereas OR in smokers was 2.01 (95\% CI 1.00-4.02) and in never smokers was 1.10 (95\% CI 0.43-2.80). The OR in ever-smokers vs. never-smokers was 1.60 (95\% CI 1.24-2.07), with an OR of 1.06 (95\% CI 1.05-1.07) per pack-year smoked, and the risk was significantly decreased after quitting smoking. Exposure to hardwood dust for at least 1 year resulted in an OR of 2.33 (95\% CI 1.40-3.91) in the total population, which was further increased in never-smokers (OR 4.89, 95\% CI 1.92-12.49) in analyses stratified by smoking status. The OR for nasal cancer after exposure to organic solvents for at least 1 year was 1.53 (1.17-2.01). Ever-use of nasal sprays/nasal lavage for at least 1 month rendered an OR of 1.59 (1.04-2.44). The OR after use of insecticides in homes was 1.48 (95\% CI 1.04-2.11). Conclusions: Smoking and exposure to hardwood dust were confirmed as risk factors for nasal carcinoma. There is evidence that exposure to organic solvents, and in-house use of insecticides could represent novel risk factors. Exposure to asbestos and use of nasal snuff were risk factors in smokers only.},
  language  = {en}
}