@article{WagnerWetzWiegeringetal.2021, author = {Wagner, Johanna C. and Wetz, Anja and Wiegering, Armin and Lock, Johan F. and L{\"o}b, Stefan and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Klein, Ingo}, title = {Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy}, series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}, volume = {406}, journal = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}, number = {7}, issn = {1435-2451}, doi = {10.1007/s00423-021-02221-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267541}, pages = {2479-2487}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds "preconditioned" with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013-2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7\% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80\% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.}, language = {en} } @article{ReimerSeyfriedFlemmingetal.2022, author = {Reimer, Stanislaus and Seyfried, Florian and Flemming, Sven and Brand, Markus and Weich, Alexander and Widder, Anna and Plaßmeier, Lars and Kraus, Peter and D{\"o}ring, Anna and Hering, Ilona and Hankir, Mohammed K. and Meining, Alexander and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Lock, Johan F. and Groneberg, Kaja}, title = {Evolution of endoscopic vacuum therapy for upper gastrointestinal leakage over a 10-year period: a quality improvement study}, series = {Surgical Endoscopy}, volume = {36}, journal = {Surgical Endoscopy}, number = {12}, doi = {10.1007/s00464-022-09400-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323953}, pages = {9169-9178}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment option for leakage of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of quality improvements in EVT management on patients' outcome. Methods All patients treated by EVT at our center during 2012-2021 were divided into two consecutive and equal-sized cohorts (period 1 vs. period 2). Over time several quality improvement strategies were implemented including the earlier diagnosis and EVT treatment and technical optimization of endoscopy. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite score MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length-of-stay > 30 days). Secondary endpoints included EVT efficacy, complications, in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay (LOS) and nutrition status at discharge. Results A total of 156 patients were analyzed. During the latter period the primary endpoint MTL30 decreased from 60.8 to 39.0\% (P = .006). EVT efficacy increased from 80 to 91\% (P = .049). Further, the need for additional procedures for leakage management decreased from 49.9 to 29.9\% (P = .013) and reoperations became less frequent (38.0\% vs.15.6\%; P = .001). The duration of leakage therapy and LOS were shortened from 25 to 14 days (P = .003) and 38 days to 25 days (P = .006), respectively. Morbidity (as determined by the comprehensive complication index) decreased from 54.6 to 46.5 (P = .034). More patients could be discharged on oral nutrition (70.9\% vs. 84.4\%, P = .043). Conclusions Our experience confirms the efficacy of EVT for the successful management of UGI leakage. Our quality improvement analysis demonstrates significant changes in EVT management resulting in accelerated recovery, fewer complications and improved functional outcome.}, language = {en} } @article{ReimerLockFlemmingetal.2022, author = {Reimer, Stanislaus and Lock, Johan F. and Flemming, Sven and Weich, Alexander and Widder, Anna and Plaßmeier, Lars and D{\"o}ring, Anna and Hering, Ilona and Hankir, Mohammed K. and Meining, Alexander and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Groneberg, Kaja and Seyfried, Florian}, title = {Endoscopic management of large leakages after upper gastrointestinal surgery}, series = {Frontiers in Surgery}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Surgery}, issn = {2296-875X}, doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2022.885244}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-274044}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an evidence-based option to treat anastomotic leakages of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but the technical challenges and clinical outcomes of patients with large defects remain poorly described. Methods All patients with leakages of the upper GI tract that were treated with endoscopic negative pressure therapy at our institution from 2012-2021 were analyzed. Patients with large defects (>30 mm) as an indicator of complex treatment were compared to patients with smaller defects (control group). Results Ninety-two patients with postoperative anastomotic or staplerline leakages were identified, of whom 20 (21.7\%) had large defects. Compared to the control group, these patients required prolonged therapy (42 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (63 vs. 26 days, p < 0.001) and developed significantly more septic complications (40 vs. 17.6\%, p = 0.027.) which often necessitated additional endoscopic and/or surgical/interventional treatments (45 vs. 17.4\%, p = 0.007.) Nevertheless, a resolution of leakages was achieved in 80\% of patients with large defects, which was similar compared to the control group (p = 0.42). Multiple leakages, especially on the opposite side, along with other local unfavorable conditions, such as foreign material mass, limited access to the defect or extensive necrosis occurred significantly more often in cases with large defects (p < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, our study confirms that EVT for leakages even from large defects of the upper GI tract is feasible in most cases but comes with significant technical challenges.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerKoehlerHendricksetal.2021, author = {M{\"u}ller, Sophie and K{\"o}hler, Franziska and Hendricks, Anne and Kastner, Carolin and B{\"o}rner, Kevin and Diers, Johannes and Lock, Johan F. and Petritsch, Bernhard and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin}, title = {Brain metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to establish a guideline for daily treatment}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {13}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {4}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers13040900}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228883}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide. Most patients with metastatic CRC develop liver or lung metastases, while a minority suffer from brain metastases. There is little information available regarding the presentation, treatment, and overall survival of brain metastases (BM) from CRC. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes data collected from three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) based on the key words "brain", "metastas*", "tumor", "colorectal", "cancer", and "malignancy". In total, 1318 articles were identified in the search and 86 studies matched the inclusion criteria. The incidence of BM varied between 0.1\% and 11.5\%. Most patients developed metastases at other sites prior to developing BM. Lung metastases and KRAS mutations were described as risk factors for additional BM. Patients with BM suffered from various symptoms, but up to 96.8\% of BM patients were asymptomatic at the time of BM diagnosis. Median survival time ranged from 2 to 9.6 months, and overall survival (OS) increased up to 41.1 months in patients on a multimodal therapy regimen. Several factors including age, blood levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), multiple metastases sites, number of brain lesions, and presence of the KRAS mutation were predictors of OS. For BM diagnosis, MRI was considered to be state of the art. Treatment consisted of a combination of surgery, radiation, or systemic treatment.}, language = {en} } @article{KoehlerReeseKastneretal.2022, author = {K{\"o}hler, Franziska and Reese, Lena and Kastner, Carolin and Hendricks, Anne and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Lock, Johan F. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin}, title = {Surgical site infection following single-port appendectomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis}, series = {Frontiers in Surgery}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Surgery}, issn = {2296-875X}, doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2022.919744}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276943}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most common postoperative complications after appendectomy leading to recurrent surgery, prolonged hospital stay, and the use of antibiotics. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have been published on the effect of open versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) reporting faster postoperative recovery and less postoperative pain for CLA. A development from CLA has been the single-port appendectomy (SPA), associated with a better cosmesis but seemingly having a higher risk of wound infections. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to investigate whether reduced port or SPA alters the ratio of SSIs. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened for suitable articles. All articles published between January 1, 2002, and March 23, 2022, were included. Articles regarding children below the age of 18 were excluded as well as manuscripts that investigated solemnly open appendectomies. Articles were screened for inclusion criteria by two independent authors. Incidence of SSI was the primary outcome. Duration of operation and length of hospital stay were defined as secondary outcomes. Results A total of 25 studies were found through a database search describing 5484 patients. A total of 2749 patients received SPA and 2735 received CLA. There was no statistical difference in the rate of SSI (P = 0.98). A total of 22 studies including 4699 patients reported the duration of operation (2223 SPA and 2476 CLA). There was a significantly shorter operation time seen in CLA. The length of hospital stay was reported in 23 studies (4735 patients: 2235 SPA and 2500 CLA). A shorter hospital stay was seen in the SPA group (P < 0.00001). Separately performed analysis of randomized controlled trials could not confirm this effect (P = 0.29). Discussion SPA is an equally safe procedure considering SSI compared to CLA and does not lead to an increased risk of SSI. A longer operation time for SPA and a minor difference in the length of stay does lead to the use of SPA in selected patients only.}, language = {en} } @article{KoehlerReeseHendricksetal.2022, author = {K{\"o}hler, Franziska and Reese, Lena and Hendricks, Anne and Kastner, Carolin and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Lock, Johan F. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin}, title = {Low-grade mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) of the appendix in Germany between 2011 and 2018: a nationwide analysis based on data provided by the German Center for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD) at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI)}, series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}, volume = {407}, journal = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1007/s00423-022-02639-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323919}, pages = {3615-3622}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Introduction Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are semi-malignant tumors of the appendix which are incidentally found in up to 1\% of appendectomy specimen. To this day, no valid descriptive analysis on LAMN is available for the German population. Methods Data of LAMN (ICD-10: D37.3) were collected from the population-based cancer registries in Germany, provided by the German Center for Cancer Registry Data (Zentrum f{\"u}r Krebsregisterdaten—ZfKD). Data was anonymized and included gender, age at diagnosis, tumor staging according to the TNM-classification, state of residence, information on the performed therapy, and survival data. Results A total of 612 cases were reported to the ZfKD between 2011 and 2018. A total of 63.07\% were female and 36.93\% were male. Great inhomogeneity in reporting cases was seen in the federal states of Germany including the fact that some federal states did not report any cases at all. Age distribution showed a mean age of 62.03 years (SD 16.15) at diagnosis. However, data on tumor stage was only available in 24.86\% of cases (n = 152). A total of 49.34\% of these patients presented with a T4-stage. Likewise, information regarding performed therapy was available in the minority of patients: 269 patients received surgery, 22 did not and for 312 cases no information was available. Twenty-four patients received chemotherapy, 188 did not, and for 400 cases, no information was available. Overall 5-year survival was estimated at 79.52\%. Patients below the age of 55 years at time of diagnosis had a significantly higher 5-year survival rate compared to patients above the age of 55 years (85.77\% vs. 73.27\%). Discussion In this study, we observed an incidence of LAMN in 0.13\% of all appendectomy specimen in 2018. It seems likely that not all cases were reported to the ZfKD; therefore, case numbers may be considered underestimated. Age and gender distribution goes in line with international studies with females being predominantly affected. Especially regarding tumor stage and therapy in depth information cannot be provided through the ZfKD-database. This data analysis emphasizes the need for further studies and the need for setting up a specialized registry for this unique tumor entity to develop guidelines for the appropriate treatment and follow-up.}, language = {en} } @article{KoehlerHendricksKastneretal.2021, author = {K{\"o}hler, Franziska and Hendricks, Anne and Kastner, Carolin and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Boerner, Kevin and Wagner, Johanna C. and Lock, Johan F. and Wiegering, Armin}, title = {Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis-a systematic review}, series = {International Journal of Colorectal Disease}, volume = {36}, journal = {International Journal of Colorectal Disease}, number = {10}, issn = {1432-1262}, doi = {10.1007/s00384-021-03927-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266616}, pages = {2283-2286}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background Over the last years, laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively replaced open appendectomy and become the current gold standard treatment for suspected, uncomplicated appendicitis. At the same time, though, it is an ongoing discussion that antibiotic therapy can be an equivalent treatment for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotic therapy and compare it to the laparoscopic appendectomy for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods The PubMed database, Embase database, and Cochrane library were scanned for studies comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction. The primary endpoint was defined as successful treatment of appendicitis. Secondary endpoints were pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, absence from work, and incidence of complications. Results No studies were found that exclusively compared laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis. Conclusions To date, there are no studies comparing antibiotic treatment to laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, thus emphasizing the lack of evidence and need for further investigation.}, language = {en} }