@article{BeckerAndersenHofmeisterMuelleretal.2012,
  author    = {Becker, J{\"u}rgen C. and Andersen, Mads H. and Hofmeister-M{\"u}ller, Valeska and Wobser, Marion and Frey, Lidia and Sandig, Christiane and Walter, Steffen and Singh-Jasuja, Harpreet and K{\"a}mpgen, Eckhart and Opitz, Andreas and Zapatka, Marc and Br{\"o}cker, Eva-B. and thor Straten, Per and Schrama, David and Ugurel, Selma},
  title     = {Survivin-specific T-cell reactivity correlates with tumor response and patient survival: a phase-II peptide vaccination trial in metastatic melanoma},
  series = {Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00262-012-1266-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-124830},
  pages     = {2091-2103},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background Therapeutic vaccination directed to induce an anti-tumoral T-cell response is a field of extensive investigation in the treatment of melanoma. However, many vaccination trials in melanoma failed to demonstrate a correlation between the vaccine-specific immune response and therapy outcome. This has been mainly attributed to immune escape by antigen loss, rendering us in the need of new vaccination targets. Patients and methods This phase-II trial investigated a peptide vaccination against survivin, an oncogenic inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein crucial for the survival of tumor cells, in HLA-A1/-A2/-B35-positive patients with treatment-refractory stage-IV metastatic melanoma. The study endpoints were survivin-specific T-cell reactivity (SSTR), safety, response, and survival (OS). Results Sixty-one patients (ITT) received vaccination therapy using three different regimens. 55 patients (PP) were evaluable for response and survival, and 41/55 for SSTR. Patients achieving progression arrest (CR + PR + SD) more often showed SSTRs than patients with disease progression (p = 0.0008). Patients presenting SSTRs revealed a prolonged OS (median 19.6 vs. 8.6 months; p = 0.0077); multivariate analysis demonstrated SSTR as an independent predictor of survival (p = 0.013). The induction of SSTRs was associated with gender (female vs. male; p = 0.014) and disease stage (M1a/b vs. M1c; p = 0.010), but not with patient age, HLA type, performance status, or vaccination regimen. Conclusion Survivin-specific T-cell reactivities strongly correlate with tumor response and patient survival, indicating that vaccination with survivin-derived peptides is a promising treatment strategy in melanoma.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerBroeckerKlinkeretal.2012,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, P.A. and Br{\"o}cker, E.B. and Klinker, E. and Stoevesandt, J. and Benoit, S.},
  title     = {Adjuvant treatment of recalcitrant Bullous pemphigoid with immunoadsorption},
  series = {Dermatology},
  volume    = {224},
  journal   = {Dermatology},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {1018-8665},
  doi       = {10.1159/000339071},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-196620},
  pages     = {224 -- 227},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Elimination of pathogenic autoantibodies by immunoadsorption (IA) has been described as an effective adjuvant treatment in severe bullous autoimmune diseases, especially in pemphigus. There is much less experience in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP). BP was diagnosed in a 62-year-old Caucasian woman presenting a pruritic rash with multiple tense blisters. Standard treatments with topical and oral corticosteroids, steroid-sparing agents including dapsone, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and intravenous immunoglobulins were ineffective or had to be discontinued due to adverse events. An immediate clinical response could be achieved by two treatment cycles of adjuvant protein A immunoadsorption (PA-IA) in addition to continued treatment with MMF (2 g/day) and prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day). Tolerance was excellent. Clinical improvement remained stable after discontinuation of IA and went along with sustained reduction of circulating autoantibodies. Our data demonstrate that PA-IA might be a safe and effective adjuvant treatment in severe and recalcitrant BP.},
  language  = {en}
}