@article{EngelhardtTerposKleberetal.2014,
  author    = {Engelhardt, Monika and Terpos, Evangelos and Kleber, Martina and Gay, Francesca and W{\"a}sch, Ralph and Morgan, Gareth and Cavo, Michele and van de Donk, Niels and Beilhack, Andreas and Bruno, Benedetto and Johnsen, Hans Erik and Hajek, Roman and Driessen, Christoph and Ludwig, Heinz and Beksac, Meral and Boccadoro, Mario and Straka, Christian and Brighen, Sara and Gramatzki, Martin and Larocca, Alessandra and Lokhorst, Henk and Magarotto, Valeria and Morabito, Fortunato and Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Einsele, Hermann and Sonneveld, Pieter and Palumbo, Antonio},
  title     = {European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma},
  series = {Haematologica},
  volume    = {99},
  journal   = {Haematologica},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.3324/haematol.2013.099358},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117477},
  pages     = {232-242},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Multiple myeloma management has undergone profound changes in the past thanks to advances in our understanding of the disease biology and improvements in treatment and supportive care approaches. This article presents recommendations of the European Myeloma Network for newly diagnosed patients based on the GRADE system for level of evidence. All patients with symptomatic disease should undergo risk stratification to classify patients for International Staging System stage (level of evidence: 1A) and for cytogenetically defined high-versus standard-risk groups (2B). Novel-agent-based induction and up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in medically fit patients remains the standard of care (1A). Induction therapy should include a triple combination of bortezomib, with either adriamycin or thalidomide and dexamethasone (1A), or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (2B). Currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be considered for young patients with high-risk disease and preferably in the context of a clinical trial (2B). Thalidomide (1B) or lenalidomide (1A) maintenance increases progression-free survival and possibly overall survival (2B). Bortezomib-based regimens are a valuable consolidation option, especially for patients who failed excellent response after autologous stem cell transplantation (2A). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide are the standards of care for transplant-ineligible patients (1A). Melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance increases progression-free survival, but overall survival data are needed. New data from the phase III study (MM-020/IFM 07-01) of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone reached its primary end point of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared to melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide and provides further evidence for the efficacy of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients (2B).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TerposKleberEngelhardtetal.2015,
  author    = {Terpos, Evangelos and Kleber, Martina and Engelhardt, Monika and Zweegman, Sonja and Gay, Francesca and Kastritis, Efstathios and van de Donk, Niels W. C. J. and Bruno, Benedetto and Sezer, Orhan and Broijl, Annemiek and Bringhen, Sara and Beksac, Meral and Larocca, Alessandra and Hajek, Roman and Musto, Pellegrino and Johnsen, Hans Erik and Morabito, Fortunato and Ludwig, Heinz and Cavo, Michele and Einsele, Hermann and Sonneveld, Pieter and Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Palumbo, Antonio},
  title     = {European Myeloma Network Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma-related Complications},
  series = {Haematologica},
  volume    = {100},
  journal   = {Haematologica},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.3324/haematol.2014.117176},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141913},
  pages     = {1254 -- 1266},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The European Myeloma Network provides recommendations for the management of the most common complications of multiple myeloma. Whole body low-dose computed tomography is more sensitive than conventional radiography in depicting osteolytic disease and thus we recommend it as the novel standard for the detection of lytic lesions in myeloma (grade 1A). Myeloma patients with adequate renal function and bone disease at diagnosis should be treated with zoledronic acid or pamidronate (grade 1A). Symptomatic patients without lytic lesions on conventional radiography can be treated with zoledronic acid (grade 1B), but its advantage is not clear for patients with no bone involvement on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. In asymptomatic myeloma, bisphosphonates are not recommended (grade 1A). Zoledronic acid should be given continuously, but it is not clear if patients who achieve at least a very good partial response benefit from its continuous use (grade 1B). Treatment with erythropoietic-stimulating agents may be initiated in patients with persistent symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin < 10g/dL) in whom other causes of anemia have been excluded (grade 1B). Erythropoietic agents should be stopped after 6-8 weeks if no adequate hemoglobin response is achieved. For renal impairment, bortezomib-based regimens are the current standard of care (grade 1A). For the management of treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy, drug modification is needed (grade 1C). Vaccination against influenza is recommended; vaccination against streptococcus pneumonia and hemophilus influenza is appropriate, but efficacy is not guaranteed due to suboptimal immune response (grade 1C). Prophylactic aciclovir (or valacyclovir) is recommended for patients receiving proteasome inhibitors, autologous or allogeneic transplantation (grade 1A).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DimopoulosWeiselSongetal.2015,
  author    = {Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Weisel, Katja C. and Song, Kevin W. and Delforge, Michel and Karlin, Lionel and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Moreau, Philippe and Banos, Anne and Oriol, Albert and Garderet, Laurent and Cavo, Michele and Ivanova, Valentina and Alegre, Adrian and Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin and Chen, Christine and Spencer, Andrew and Knop, Stefan and Bahlis, Nizar J. and Renner, Christoph and Yu, Xin and Hong, Kevin and Sternas, Lars and Jacques, Christian and Zaki, Mohamed H. and San Miguel, Jesus F.},
  title     = {Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone},
  series = {Haematologica},
  volume    = {100},
  journal   = {Haematologica},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.3324/haematol.2014.117077},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140349},
  pages     = {1327 -- 1333},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who no longer receive benefit from novel agents have limited treatment options and short expected survival. del(17p) and t(4;14) are correlated with shortened survival. The phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefits from treatment with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone compared to high-dose dexamethasone among patients in whom bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment had failed. At an updated median follow-up of 15.4 months, the progression-free survival was 4.0 versus 1.9 months (HR, 0.50; P<0.001), and median overall survival was 13.1 versus 8.1 months (HR, 0.72; P=0.009). Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, compared with high-dose dexamethasone, improved progression-free survival in patients with del(17p) (4.6 versus 1.1 months; HR, 0.34; P < 0.001), t(4;14) (2.8 versus 1.9 months; HR, 0.49; P=0.028), and in standard-risk patients (4.2 versus 2.3 months; HR, 0.55; P<0.001). Although the majority of patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone took pomalidomide after discontinuation, the overall survival of patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone or highdose dexamethasone was 12.6 versus 7.7 months (HR, 0.45; P=0.008) in patients with del(17p), 7.5 versus 4.9 months (HR, 1.12; P=0.761) in those with t(4;14), and 14.0 versus 9.0 months (HR, 0.85; P=0.380) in standard-risk subjects. The overall response rate was higher in patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone than in those treated with high-dose dexamethasone both among standard-risk patients (35.2\% versus 9.7\%) and those with del(17p) (31.8\% versus 4.3\%), whereas it was similar in patients with t(4; 14) (15.9\% versus 13.3\%). The safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was consistent with initial reports. In conclusion, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and del(17p) and/or t(4;14).},
  language  = {en}
}