@article{HaarmannDeissProchaskaetal.2010,
  author    = {Haarmann, Axel and Deiss, Annika and Prochaska, Juergen and Foerch, Christian and Weksler, Babette and Romero, Ignacio and Couraud, Pierre-Olivier and Stoll, Guido and Rieckmann, Peter and Buttmann, Mathias},
  title     = {Evaluation of Soluble Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A as a Biomarker of Human Brain Endothelial Barrier Breakdown},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68468},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {Background: An inducible release of soluble junctional adhesion molecule-A (sJAM-A) under pro-inflammatory conditions was described in cultured non-CNS endothelial cells (EC) and increased sJAM-A serum levels were found to indicate inflammation in non-CNS vascular beds. Here we studied the regulation of JAM-A expression in cultured brain EC and evaluated sJAM-A as a serum biomarker of blood-brain barrier (BBB) function. Methodology/Principal Findings: As previously reported in non-CNS EC types, pro-inflammatory stimulation of primary or immortalized (hCMEC/D3) human brain microvascular EC (HBMEC) induced a redistribution of cell-bound JAM-A on the cell surface away from tight junctions, along with a dissociation from the cytoskeleton. This was paralleled by reduced immunocytochemical staining of occludin and zonula occludens-1 as well as by increased paracellular permeability for dextran 3000. Both a self-developed ELISA test and Western blot analysis detected a constitutive sJAM-A release by HBMEC into culture supernatants, which importantly was unaffected by pro-inflammatory or hypoxia/reoxygenation challenge. Accordingly, serum levels of sJAM-A were unaltered in 14 patients with clinically active multiple sclerosis compared to 45 stable patients and remained unchanged in 13 patients with acute ischemic non-small vessel stroke over time. Conclusion: Soluble JAM-A was not suited as a biomarker of BBB breakdown in our hands. The unexpected non-inducibility of sJAM-A release at the human BBB might contribute to a particular resistance of brain EC to inflammatory stimuli, protecting the CNS compartment.},
  subject      = {Biomarker},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LugerHohmannNiemannetal.2015,
  author    = {Luger, Sebastian and Hohmann, Carina and Niemann, Daniela and Kraft, Peter and Gunreben, Ignaz and Neumann-Haefelin, Tobias and Kleinschnitz, Christoph and Steinmetz, Helmuth and Foerch, Christian and Pfeilschifter, Waltraud},
  title     = {Adherence to oral anticoagulant therapy in secondary stroke prevention - impact of the novel oral anticoagulants},
  series = {Patient Preference and Adherence},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Patient Preference and Adherence},
  doi       = {10.2147/PPA.S88994},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144477},
  pages     = {1695-1705},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) potently prevents strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard of care for long-term OAT for decades, but non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have recently been approved for this indication, and raised many questions, among them their influence on medication adherence. We assessed adherence to VKA and NOAC in secondary stroke prevention. Methods: All patients treated from October 2011 to September 2012 for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack with a subsequent indication for OAT, at three academic hospitals were entered into a prospective registry, and baseline data and antithrombotic treatment at discharge were recorded. At the 1-year follow-up, we assessed the adherence to different OAT strategies and patients' adherence to their respective OAT. We noted OAT changes, reasons to change treatment, and factors that influence persistence to the prescribed OAT. Results: In patients discharged on OAT, we achieved a fatality corrected response rate of 73.3\% (n=209). A total of 92\% of these patients received OAT at the 1-year follow-up. We observed good adherence to both VKA and NOAC (VKA, 80.9\%; NOAC, 74.8\%; P=0.243) with a statistically nonsignificant tendency toward a weaker adherence to dabigatran. Disability at 1-year follow-up was an independent predictor of lower adherence to any OAT after multivariate analysis, whereas the choice of OAT did not have a relevant influence. Conclusion: One-year adherence to OAT after stroke is strong (>90\%) and patients who switch therapy most commonly switch toward another OAT. The 1-year adherence rates to VKA and NOAC in secondary stroke prevention do not differ significantly between both therapeutic strategies.},
  language  = {en}
}