@article{TonyBurmesterSchulzeKoopsetal.2011,
  author    = {Tony, Hans-Peter and Burmester, Gerd and Schulze-Koops, Hendrik and Grunke, Mathias and Henes, Joerg and K{\"o}tter, Ina and Haas, Judith and Unger, Leonore and Lovric, Svjetlana and Haubitz, Marion and Fischer-Betz, Rebecca and Chehab, Gamal and Rubbert-Roth, Andrea and Specker, Christof and Weinerth, Jutta and Holle, Julia and M{\"u}ller-Ladner, Ulf and K{\"o}nig, Ramona and Fiehn, Christoph and Burgwinkel, Philip and Budde, Klemens and S{\"o}rensen, Helmut and Meurer, Michael and Aringer, Martin and Kieseier, Bernd and Erfurt-Berge, Cornelia and Sticherling, Michael and Veelken, Roland and Ziemann, Ulf and Strutz, Frank and von Wussow, Praxis and Meier, Florian MP and Hunzelmann, Nico and Schmidt, Enno and Bergner, Raoul and Schwarting, Andreas and Eming, R{\"u}diger and Schwarz-Eywill, Michael and Wassenberg, Siegfried and Fleck, Martin and Metzler, Claudia and Zettl, Uwe and Westphal, Jens and Heitmann, Stefan and Herzog, Anna L. and Wiendl, Heinz and Jakob, Waltraud and Schmidt, Elvira and Freivogel, Klaus and D{\"o}rner, Thomas and Hertl, Michael and Stadler, Rudolf},
  title     = {Safety and clinical outcomes of rituximab therapy in patients with different autoimmune diseases: experience from a national registry (GRAID)},
  series = {Arthritis Research \& Therapy},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Arthritis Research \& Therapy},
  number    = {R75},
  doi       = {10.1186/ar3337},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142856},
  pages     = {1-14},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Evidence from a number of open-label, uncontrolled studies has suggested that rituximab may benefit patients with autoimmune diseases who are refractory to standard-of-care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of rituximab in several standard-of-care-refractory autoimmune diseases (within rheumatology, nephrology, dermatology and neurology) other than rheumatoid arthritis or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a real-life clinical setting. Methods: Patients who received rituximab having shown an inadequate response to standard-of-care had their safety and clinical outcomes data retrospectively analysed as part of the German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases. The main outcome measures were safety and clinical response, as judged at the discretion of the investigators. Results: A total of 370 patients (299 patient-years) with various autoimmune diseases (23.0\% with systemic lupus erythematosus, 15.7\% antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated granulomatous vasculitides, 15.1\% multiple sclerosis and 10.0\% pemphigus) from 42 centres received a mean dose of 2,440 mg of rituximab over a median (range) of 194 (180 to 1,407) days. The overall rate of serious infections was 5.3 per 100 patient-years during rituximab therapy. Opportunistic infections were infrequent across the whole study population, and mostly occurred in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. There were 11 deaths (3.0\% of patients) after rituximab treatment (mean 11.6 months after first infusion, range 0.8 to 31.3 months), with most of the deaths caused by infections. Overall (n = 293), 13.3\% of patients showed no response, 45.1\% showed a partial response and 41.6\% showed a complete response. Responses were also reflected by reduced use of glucocorticoids and various immunosuppressives during rituximab therapy and follow-up compared with before rituximab. Rituximab generally had a positive effect on patient well-being (physician's visual analogue scale; mean improvement from baseline of 12.1 mm)},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RechHueberFinzeletal.2016,
  author    = {Rech, Juergen and Hueber, Axel J. and Finzel, Stephanie and Englbrecht, Matthias and Haschka, Judith and Manger, Bernhard and Kleyer, Arnd and Reiser, Michaela and Cobra, Jayme Fogagnolo and Figueiredo, Camille and Tony, Hans-Peter and Kleinert, Stefan and Wendler, Joerg and Schuch, Florian and Ronneberger, Monika and Feuchtenberger, Martin and Fleck, Martin and Manger, Karin and Ochs, Wolfgang and Schmitt-Haendle, Matthias and Lorenz, Hanns-Martin and Nuesslein, Hubert and Alten, Rieke and Henes, Joerg and Krueger, Klaus and Schett, Georg},
  title     = {Prediction of disease relapses by multibiomarker disease activity and autoantibody status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on tapering DMARD treatment},
  series = {Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases},
  volume    = {75},
  journal   = {Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207900},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187519},
  pages     = {1637-1644},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Objective To analyse the role of multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score in predicting disease relapses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission who tapered disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in RETRO, a prospective randomised controlled trial. Methods MBDA scores (scale 1-100) were determined based on 12 inflammation markers in baseline serum samples from 94 patients of the RETRO study. MBDA scores were compared between patients relapsing or remaining in remission when tapering DMARDs. Demographic and disease-specific parameters were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis for defining predictors of relapse. Results Moderate-to-high MBDA scores were found in 33\% of patients with RA overall. Twice as many patients who relapsed (58\%) had moderate/high MBDA compared with patients who remained in remission (21\%). Baseline MBDA scores were significantly higher in patients with RA who were relapsing than those remaining in stable remission (N=94; p=0.0001) and those tapering/stopping (N=59; p=0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis identified MBDA scores as independent predictor for relapses in addition to anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status. Relapse rates were low (13\%) in patients who were MBDA-/ACPA-, moderate in patients who were MBDA+/ACPA- (33.3\%) and MBDA-ACPA+ (31.8\%) and high in patients who were MBDA+/ACPA+ (76.4\%). Conclusions MBDA improved the prediction of relapses in patients with RA in stable remission undergoing DMARD tapering. If combined with ACPA testing, MBDA allowed prediction of relapse in more than 80\% of the patients. Trial registration number EudraCT 2009-015740-42.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StephanTascilarYalcinMutluetal.2023,
  author    = {Stephan, Marlene and Tascilar, Koray and Yalcin-Mutlu, Melek and Hagen, Melanie and Haschka, Judith and Reiser, Michaela and Hartmann, Fabian and Kleyer, Arnd and Hueber, Axel J. and Manger, Bernhard and Figueiredo, Camille and Cobra, Jayme Fogagnolo and Tony, Hans-Peter and Finzel, Stephanie and Kleinert, Stefan and Wendler, J{\"o}rg and Schuch, Florian and Ronneberger, Monika and Feuchtenberger, Martin and Fleck, Martin and Manger, Karin and Ochs, Wolfgang and Schmitt-Haendle, Matthias and Lorenz, Hannes Martin and N{\"u}sslein, Hubert and Alten, Rieke and Henes, Joerg and Kr{\"u}ger, Klaus and Schett, Georg and Rech, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Physical function of RA patients tapering treatment — a post hoc analysis of the randomized controlled RETRO trial},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {11},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm12113723},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319349},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Several studies have shown that tapering or stopping disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in sustained remission is feasible. However, tapering/stopping bears the risk of decline in physical function as some patients may relapse and face increased disease activity. Here, we analyzed the impact of tapering or stopping DMARD treatment on the physical function of RA patients. The study was a post hoc analysis of physical functional worsening for 282 patients with RA in sustained remission tapering and stopping DMARD treatment in the prospective randomized RETRO study. HAQ and DAS-28 scores were determined in baseline samples of patients continuing DMARD (arm 1), tapering their dose by 50\% (arm 2), or stopping after tapering (arm 3). Patients were followed over 1 year, and HAQ and DAS-28 scores were evaluated every 3 months. The effect of treatment reduction strategy on functional worsening was assessed in a recurrent-event Cox regression model with a study-group (control, taper, and taper/stop) as the predictor. Two-hundred and eighty-two patients were analyzed. In 58 patients, functional worsening was observed. The incidences suggest a higher probability of functional worsening in patients tapering and/or stopping DMARDs, which is likely due to higher relapse rates in these individuals. At the end of the study, however, functional worsening was similar among the groups. Point estimates and survival curves show that the decline in functionality according to HAQ after tapering or discontinuation of DMARDs in RA patients with stable remission is associated with recurrence, but not with an overall functional decline.},
  language  = {en}
}