@article{KunathKrauseWullichetal.2013,
  author    = {Kunath, Frank and Krause, Steffen F. and Wullich, Bernd and Goebell, Peter J. and Engehausen, Dirk G. and Burger, Maximilian and Meerpohl, Joerg J. and Keck, Bastian},
  title     = {Bladder cancer - the neglected tumor: a descriptive analysis of publications referenced in MEDLINE and data from the register clinicaltrials.gov},
  series = {BMC Urology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {BMC Urology},
  number    = {56},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2490-13-56},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122133},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Background: Uro-oncological neoplasms have both a high incidence and mortality rate and are therefore a major public health problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate research activity in uro-oncology over the last decade. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov systematically for studies on prostatic, urinary bladder, kidney, and testicular neoplasms. The increase in newly published reports per year was analyzed using linear regression. The results are presented with 95\% confidence intervals, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The number of new publications per year increased significantly for prostatic, kidney and urinary bladder neoplasms (all <0.0001). We identified 1,885 randomized controlled trials (RCTs); also for RCTs, the number of newly published reports increased significantly for prostatic (p = 0.001) and kidney cancer (p = 0.005), but not for bladder (p = 0.09) or testicular (p = 0.44) neoplasms. We identified 3,114 registered uro-oncological studies in ClinicalTrials.gov. However, 85\% of these studies are focusing on prostatic (45\%) and kidney neoplasms (40\%), whereas only 11\% were registered for bladder cancers. Conclusions: While the number of publications on uro-oncologic research rises yearly for prostatic and kidney neoplasms, urothelial carcinomas of the bladder seem to be neglected despite their important clinical role. Clinical research on neoplasms of the urothelial bladder must be explicitly addressed and supported.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AlJanabiTaubertLohseFischeretal.2014,
  author    = {Al-Janabi, Omar and Taubert, Helge and Lohse-Fischer, Andrea and Fr{\"o}hner, Michael and Wach, Sven and St{\"o}hr, Robert and Keck, Bastian and Burger, Max and Wieland, Wolf and Erdmann, Kati and Wirth, Manfred P. and Wullich, Bernd and Baretton, Gustavo and Magdolen, Viktor and Kotzsch, Mathias and F{\"u}ssel, Susanne},
  title     = {Association of Tissue mRNA and Serum Antigen Levels of Members of the Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator System with Clinical and Prognostic Parameters in Prostate Cancer},
  series = {Biomed Research International},
  journal   = {Biomed Research International},
  number    = {972587},
  issn      = {2314-6141},
  doi       = {10.1155/2014/972587},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117967},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The objective was to determine the mRNA expression and protein levels of uPA system components in tissue specimens and serum samples, respectively, from prostate cancer (PCa) patients and to assess their association with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). The mRNA expression levels of uPA, its receptor (uPAR), and its inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) were analyzed in corresponding malignant and adjacent nonmalignant tissue specimens from 132 PCa patients by quantitative PCR. Preoperative serum samples from 81 PCa patients were analyzed for antigen levels of uPA system members by ELISA. RNA levels of uPA system components displayed significant correlations with each other in the tumor tissues. A significantly decreased uP AmRNA expression in PCa compared to the corresponding nonmalignant tissue was detected. High uPA mRNA level was significantly associated with a high Gleason score. Elevated concentration of soluble uPAR (suPAR) in serum was significantly associated with a poor OS of PCa patients (P = 0.022). PCa patients with high suPAR levels have a significantly higher risk of death (multivariate Cox's regression analysis; IIR - 7.12, P - 0.027). The association of high suPAR levels with poor survival of PCa patients suggests a prognostic impact of suPAR levels in serum of cancer patients.},
  language  = {en}
}