@article{ProdingerLazicHorasetal.2020, author = {Prodinger, Peter Michael and Lazic, Igor and Horas, Konstantin and Burgkart, Rainer and von Eisenhart-Rothe, R{\"u}diger and Weissenberger, Manuel and Rudert, Maximilian and Holzapfel, Boris Michael}, title = {Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {9}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm9093031}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213184}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Despite increasing numbers of primary hip arthroplasties performed through the direct anterior approach (DAA), there is a lack of literature on DAA revision arthroplasty. The present study was performed in order to evaluate outcomes and revision rates after revision through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed prospectively collected data of 57 patients (61 hips, 43 female, 18 male) who underwent aseptic acetabular component revision through the DAA with the abovementioned implant system between January 2015 and December 2017. The mean follow-up was 40 months (12-56). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All complications were documented and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an estimated five-year implant survival of 97\% (confidence interval CI 87-99\%). The estimated five-year survival with revision for any cause was 93\% (CI 83-98\%). The overall revision rate was 6.6\% (n = 4). Two patients had to undergo revision due to periprosthetic infection (3.3\%). In one patient, the acetabular component was revised due to aseptic loosening four months postoperatively. Another patient suffered from postoperative iliopsoas impingement and was treated successfully by arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy. Two (3.3\%) of the revised hips dislocated postoperatively. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 35 (2-66) preoperatively to 86 (38-100) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The hip joint's anatomical center of rotation was restored at a high degree of accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that acetabular revision arthroplasty through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation is safe and practicable, resulting in good radiographic and clinical midterm results.}, language = {en} } @article{WeissenbergerWeissenbergerWagenbrenneretal.2020, author = {Weissenberger, Manuel and Weissenberger, Manuela H. and Wagenbrenner, Mike and Heinz, Tizian and Reboredo, Jenny and Holzapfel, Boris M. and Rudert, Maximilian and Groll, J{\"u}rgen and Evans, Christopher H. and Steinert, Andre F.}, title = {Different types of cartilage neotissue fabricated from collagen hydrogels and mesenchymal stromal cells via SOX9, TGFB1 or BMP2 gene transfer}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {15}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0237479}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230494}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Objective As native cartilage consists of different phenotypical zones, this study aims to fabricate different types of neocartilage constructs from collagen hydrogels and human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) genetically modified to express different chondrogenic factors. Design Human MSCs derived from bone-marrow of osteoarthritis (OA) hips were genetically modified using adenoviral vectors encoding sex-determining region Y-type high-mobility-group-box (SOX)9,transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) 1or bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 2cDNA, placed in type I collagen hydrogels and maintained in serum-free chondrogenic media for three weeks. Control constructs contained unmodified MSCs or MSCs expressing GFP. The respective constructs were analyzed histologically, immunohistochemically, biochemically, and by qRT-PCR for chondrogenesis and hypertrophy. Results Chondrogenesis in MSCs was consistently and strongly induced in collagen I hydrogels by the transgenesSOX9,TGFB1andBMP2as evidenced by positive staining for proteoglycans, chondroitin-4-sulfate (CS4) and collagen (COL) type II, increased levels of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis, and expression of mRNAs associated with chondrogenesis. The control groups were entirely non-chondrogenic. The levels of hypertrophy, as judged by expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and COL X on both the protein and mRNA levels revealed different stages of hypertrophy within the chondrogenic groups (BMP2>TGFB1>SOX9). Conclusions Different types of neocartilage with varying levels of hypertrophy could be generated from human MSCs in collagen hydrogels by transfer of genes encoding the chondrogenic factorsSOX9,TGFB1andBMP2. This technology may be harnessed for regeneration of specific zones of native cartilage upon damage.}, language = {en} } @article{WeissenbergerHeinzRueckletal.2020, author = {Weissenberger, Manuel and Heinz, Tizian and Rueckl, Kilian and Rudert, Maximilian and Klug, Alexander and Hoffmann, Reinhard and Schmidt-Horloh{\´e}, Kay}, title = {No functional differences in anatomic reconstruction with one vs. two suture anchors after non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature}, series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}, volume = {21}, journal = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}, doi = {10.1186/s12891-020-03304-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229266}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background Surgical reattachment of the tendon is still the gold standard for ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Several fixation techniques have been described in the literature, with suture anchors being one of the most common fixation techniques. Currently, there is no data available on how many anchors are required for a safe and stable refixation. In this case report clinical data of a patient with non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures treated with a different number of suture anchors for each side (one vs. two) are demonstrated. Case presentation A 47-year-old factory worker suffered a rupture of the distal biceps tendon on both arms following two different occasions. The left side was fixed using a single suture anchor, while refixation on the right side was performed with two anchors. The patient was prospectively followed for one year. Functional outcome was assessed using the Andrews Carson Score (ACS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score after six, twelve, 24 and 48 weeks. Furthermore, an isokinetic strength measurement for flexion strength was performed after 24 and 48 weeks. After 48 weeks the patient presented with excellent functional outcome scores and no follow-up complications. During the follow-up period, no differences in the functional scores nor in the isokinetic flexion strength measurement could be detected. Furthermore, no radiological complications (like heterotopic ossifications) could be detected in the postoperative radiographs after one year. Conclusions Anatomic reattachment of the distal biceps tendon is a successful operative treatment option for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Suture anchor fixation remains one of the most common techniques, as it allows fast surgery and provides good results with respect to range of motion (ROM) and functional scoring according to the current literature. However, the number of anchors required for a stable fixation remains unclear. As indicated by our presented case, we hypothesize, that there are no significant differences between a one-point or a two-point fixation. In the presented case report, no intraindividual differences between the usage of one versus two suture anchors were evident in the short-term follow-up.}, language = {en} } @article{HorasvanHerckMaieretal.2020, author = {Horas, Konstantin and van Herck, Ulrike and Maier, Gerrit S. and Maus, Uwe and Harrasser, Norbert and Jakob, Franz and Weissenberger, Manuel and Arnholdt, J{\"o}rg and Holzapfel, Boris M. and Rudert, Maximilian}, title = {Does vitamin D deficiency predict tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours? Data from a multi-center cohort analysis}, series = {Journal of Bone Oncology}, volume = {25}, journal = {Journal of Bone Oncology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100329}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230314}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Vitamin D deficiency is a global health concern that is estimated to afflict over one billion people globally. The major role of vitamin D is that of a regulator of calcium and phosphate metabolism, thus, being essential for proper bone mineralisation. Concomitantly, vitamin D is known to exert numerous extra-skeletal actions. For example, it has become evident that vitamin D has direct anti-proliferative, pro-differentiation and pro-apoptotic actions on cancer cells. Hence, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased cancer risk and worse prognosis in several malignancies. We have recently demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency promotes secondary cancer growth in bone. These findings were partly attributable to an increase in bone remodelling but also through direct effects of vitamin D on cancer cells. To date, very little is known about vitamin D status of patients with bone tumours in general. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess vitamin D status of patients with diverse bone tumours. Moreover, the aim was to elucidate whether or not there is an association between pre-diagnostic vitamin D status and tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours. In a multi-center analysis, 25(OH)D, PTH and calcium levels of 225 patients that presented with various bone tumours between 2017 and 2018 were assessed. Collectively, 76\% of all patients had insufficient vitamin D levels with a total mean 25(OH)D level of 21.43 ng/ml (53.58 nmol/L). In particular, 52\% (117/225) of patients were identified as vitamin D deficient and further 24\% of patients (55/225) were vitamin D insufficient. Notably, patients diagnosed with malignant bone tumours had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels than patients diagnosed with benign bone tumours [19.3 vs. 22.75 ng/ml (48.25 vs. 56.86 nmol/L); p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found a widespread and distressing rate of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in patients with bone tumours. However, especially for patients with bone tumours sufficient vitamin D levels seem to be of great importance. Thus, we believe that 25(OH)D status should routinely be monitored in these patients. Collectively, there should be an increased awareness for physicians to assess and if necessary correct vitamin D status of patients with bone tumours in general or of those at great risk of developing bone tumours.}, language = {en} }