@article{AppeltshauserMessingerStarzetal.2022,
  author    = {Appeltshauser, Luise and Messinger, Julia and Starz, Katharina and Heinrich, David and Brunder, Anna-Michelle and Stengel, Helena and Fiebig, Bianca and Ayzenberg, Ilya and Birklein, Frank and Dresel, Christian and Dorst, Johannes and Dvorak, Florian and Grimm, Alexander and Joerk, Alexander and Leypoldt, Frank and M{\"a}urer, Mathias and Merl, Patrick and Michels, Sebastian and Pitarokoili, Kalliopi and Rosenfeldt, Mathias and Sperfeld, Anne-Dorte and Weihrauch, Marc and Welte, Gabriel Simon and Sommer, Claudia and Doppler, Kathrin},
  title     = {Diabetes Mellitus Is a Possible Risk Factor for Nodo-paranodopathy With Antiparanodal Autoantibodies},
  series = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1212/NXI.0000000000001163},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300551},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background and Objectives Nodo-paranodopathies are peripheral neuropathies with dysfunction of the node of Ranvier. Affected patients who are seropositive for antibodies against adhesion molecules like contactin-1 and neurofascin show distinct clinical features and a disruption of the paranodal complex. An axoglial dysjunction is also a characteristic finding of diabetic neuropathy. Here, we aim to investigate a possible association of antibody-mediated nodo-paranodopathy and diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 227 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and Guillain-Barr{\´e} syndrome from multiple centers in Germany who had undergone diagnostic testing for antiparanodal antibodies targeting neurofascin-155, pan-neurofascin, contactin-1-associated protein 1, and contactin-1. To study possible direct pathogenic effects of antiparanodal antibodies, we performed immunofluorescence binding assays on human pancreatic tissue sections. Results The frequency of DM was 33.3\% in seropositive patients and thus higher compared with seronegative patients (14.1\%, OR = 3.04, 95\% CI = 1.31-6.80). The relative risk of DM in seropositive patients was 3.4-fold higher compared with the general German population. Seropositive patients with DM most frequently harbored anti-contactin-1 antibodies and had higher antibody titers than seropositive patients without DM. The diagnosis of DM preceded the onset of neuropathy in seropositive patients. No immunoreactivity of antiparanodal antibodies against pancreatic tissue was detected. Discussion We report an association of nodo-paranodopathy and DM. Our results suggest that DM may be a potential risk factor for predisposing to developing nodo-paranodopathy and argue against DM being induced by the autoantibodies. Our findings set the basis for further research investigating underlying immunopathogenetic connections.},
  language  = {en}
}