@article{MagesShojaaKohletal.2021,
  author    = {Mages, Michelle and Shojaa, Mahdieh and Kohl, Matthias and Stengel, Simon von and Becker, Clemens and Gosch, Markus and Jakob, Franz and Kerschan-Schindl, Katharina and Kladny, Bernd and Kl{\"o}ckner, Nicole and Lange, Uwe and Middeldorf, Stefan and Peters, Stefan and Schoene, Daniel and Sieber, Cornel C. and Tholen, Reina and Thomasius, Friederike E. and Uder, Michael and Kemmler, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Exercise effects on Bone Mineral Density in men},
  series = {Nutrients},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Nutrients},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2072-6643},
  doi       = {10.3390/nu13124244},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250247},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In contrast to postmenopausal women, evidence for a favorable effect of exercise on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is still limited for men. This might be due to the paucity of studies, but also to the great variety of participants and study characteristics that may dilute study results. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of exercise on BMD changes with rational eligibility criteria. A comprehensive search of six electronic databases up to 15 March 2021 was conducted. Briefly, controlled trials ≥6 months that determined changes in areal BMD in men >18 years old, with no apparent diseases or pharmacological therapy that relevantly affect bone metabolism, were included. BMD changes (standardized mean differences: SMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were considered as outcomes. Twelve studies with 16 exercise and 12 control groups were identified. The pooled estimate of random-effect analysis was SMD = 0.38, 95\%-CI: 0.14-0.61 and SMD = 0.25, 95\%-CI: 0.00-0.49, for LS and FN, respectively. Heterogeneity between the trials was low-moderate. Funnel plots and rank and regression correlation tests indicate evidence for small study publication bias for LS but not FN-BMD. Subgroup analyses that focus on study length, type of exercise and methodologic quality revealed no significant difference between each of the three categories. In summary, we provided further evidence for a low but significant effect of exercise on BMD in men. However, we are currently unable to give even rough exercise recommendations for male cohorts.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KemmlerKohlJakobetal.2020,
  author    = {Kemmler, Wolfgang and Kohl, Matthias and Jakob, Franz and Engelke, Klaus and Stengel, Simon von},
  title     = {Effects of high intensity dynamic resistance exercise and whey protein supplements on osteosarcopenia in older men with low bone and muscle mass. Final results of the randomized controlled FrOST study},
  series = {Nutrients},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Nutrients},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {2072-6643},
  doi       = {10.3390/nu12082341},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-211108},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of high intensity dynamic resistance exercise (HIT-DRT) and whey protein supplementation (WPS) on bone mineral density (BMD) and sarcopenia parameters in osteosarcopenic men. Men ≥ 72 years with osteosarcopenia (n = 43) were randomly assigned to a HIT-RT (HIT-RT: n = 21) or a non-training control group (n = 22). Supervised HIT-RT twice/week was applied for 18 months, while the control group maintained their habitual lifestyle. Supplying WPS, total protein intake amounted to 1.5-1.6 (HIT-RT) and 1.2 g/kg/body mass/d (control). Both groups were supplied with calcium and vitamin D. Primary study outcomes were BMD and the sarcopenia Z-score. After adjusting for multiplicity, we observed significant positive effects for sarcopenia Z-score (standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.40), BMD at lumbar spine (SMD: 0.72) and total hip (SMD: 0.72). In detail, effect sizes for skeletal muscle mass changes were very pronounced (1.97, p < 0.001), while effects for functional sarcopenia parameters were moderate (0.87, p = 0.008; handgrip strength) or low (0.39, p = 0.209; gait velocity). Apart from one man who reported short periods of temporary worsening of existing joint pain, no HIT-RT/WPS-related adverse effects or injuries were reported. We consider HIT-RT supported by whey protein supplementation as a feasible, attractive, safe and highly effective option to fight osteosarcopenia in older men.},
  language  = {en}
}