@article{AbboudAsendorfHeinrichetal.2021,
  author    = {Abboud, Tammam and Asendorf, Thomas and Heinrich, Jutta and Faust, Katharina and Krieg, Sandro M. and Seidel, Kathleen and Mielke, Dorothee and Matthies, Cordola and Ringel, Florian and Rohde, Veit and Szel{\´e}nyi, Andrea},
  title     = {Transcranial versus direct cortical stimulation for motor-evoked potentials during resection of supratentorial tumors under general anesthesia (the TRANSEKT-trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial},
  series = {Biomedicines},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Biomedicines},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {2227-9059},
  doi       = {10.3390/biomedicines9101490},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-248513},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Monitoring of motor function during surgery for supratentorial tumors under general anesthesia applies either transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) or direct cortical stimulation (DCS) to elicit motor-evoked potentials. To date, there is no guideline that favor one method over the other. Therefore, we designed this randomized study to compare between both methods regarding the prediction of postoperative motor deficits and extent of tumor resection. Methods: This is a multicenter (six centers in Germany and one in Switzerland), double blind, parallel group, exploratory, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients without or with mild paresis, who are scheduled for surgical resection of motor-eloquent brain tumors under general anesthesia will be randomized to surgical resection under TES or surgical resection under DCS. The primary endpoint is sensitivity and specificity in prognosis of motor function 7 days after surgery. The main secondary endpoint is the extent of tumor resection. The study is planned to include 120 patients within 2 years. Discussion: The present exploratory study should compare TES and DCS regarding sensitivity and specificity in predicting postoperative motor deficit and extent of tumor resection to calculate the required number of patients in a confirmatory trial to test the superiority of one method over the other.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlaesnerBuchmannGemptetal.2015,
  author    = {Kl{\"a}sner, Benjamin and Buchmann, Niels and Gempt, Jens and Ringel, Florian and Lapa, Constantin and Krause, Bernd Joachim},
  title     = {Early [\(^{18}\)F]FET-PET in Gliomas after Surgical Resection: Comparison with MRI and Histopathology},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0141153},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-139549},
  pages     = {e0141153},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background The precise definition of the post-operative resection status in high-grade gliomas (HGG) is crucial for further management. We aimed to assess the feasibility of assessment of the resection status with early post-operative positron emission tomography (PET) using [\(^{18}\)F]O-(2-[\(^{18}\)F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([\(^{18}\)F]FET). Methods 25 patients with the suspicion of primary HGG were enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative [\(^{18}\)F]FET-PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intra-operatively, resection status was assessed using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Imaging was repeated within 72h after neurosurgery. Post-operative [\(^{18}\)F]FET-PET was compared with MRI, intra-operative assessment and clinical follow-up. Results [\(^{18}\)F]FET-PET, MRI and intra-operative assessment consistently revealed complete resection in 12/25 (48\%) patients and incomplete resection in 6/25 cases (24\%). In 7 patients, PET revealed discordant findings. One patient was re-resected. 3/7 experienced tumor recurrence, 3/7 died shortly after brain surgery. Conclusion Early assessment of the resection status in HGG with [\(^{18}\)F]FET-PET seems to be feasible.},
  language  = {en}
}