@article{Ziegler2020, author = {Ziegler, Robert Hugo}, title = {Die R{\"u}ckkehr des Realen}, series = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie}, volume = {68}, journal = {Deutsche Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Philosophie}, number = {4}, issn = {2192-1482}, doi = {10.1515/dzph-2020-0040}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-217771}, pages = {611 -- 626}, year = {2020}, abstract = {We are witnessing a return of the real which philosophy seems illequipped to handle. I argue (1) that this return of the real must be read as a rejection of those philosophical tendencies which were prevalent in the past decades and which I call philosophies of mediation: They supplanted all references to something real by the sole reference to those processes in which reality was supposed to be given or shaped (in interpretations, linguistic structures, historical or social conditions, media…). The current urgency of the question of the real indicates that those philosophies have lost credibility. On the other hand (2), the contemporary attempts to resuscitate philosophical realism cannot be considered satisfactory either. It is curiously the real itself they fail to fully appreciate. All in all (3), the return of the real has to be interpreted as the effect of an event that has little to do with philosophy, namely the return of politics.}, language = {de} } @article{FischerHeinrichs2018, author = {Fischer, Matthias and Heinrichs, Harald}, title = {Dimensions, dialectic, discourse. Three political perspectives on the sustainability of the German healthcare system}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, volume = {15}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, number = {7}, doi = {10.3390/ijerph15071526}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177003}, pages = {1526}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This review article deals with the topic of sustainability in the German healthcare system and presents an overview of how the six articles of our research relate to one another. After introducing to the context of the research, its internal principles, and the methods applied, three perspectives are presented, each also discussed in terms of the respective literature in sustainability science and political science. The review concludes by presenting a circular model and by discussing the general limitations as well as the practical implications of our research.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Deppisch2015, author = {Deppisch, Aaron}, title = {Die Religion in den Werken von Jean Bodin und Michel de Montaigne. Ein Vergleich}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120412}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Das Leben der beiden Autoren Jean Bodin und Michel de Montaigne wurde von den blutigen Auseinandersetzungen der franz{\"o}sischen Religionskriege gepr{\"a}gt. Aus diesem Grund besitzt die Religon in ihren Werken eine herausgehobene Stellung. In "Les six livres de la R{\´e}publique" von Jean Bodin gr{\"u}ndet dieser sein Prinzip der Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t auf die Religion. Diese gibt also die Grundregeln des menschlichen Zusammenlebens vor. In seinem Religionsgespr{\"a}ch "Colloqium Heptaplomeres" vertieft Bodin diese Gedanken und entwickelt ein Toleranzkonzept, das die M{\"o}glichkeit des Zusammenlebens verschiedener Religionen in einem Staat vorsieht. Die Religion ist bei Jean Bodin also vor allem ein Instrument, um die Gesellschaft zu organisieren. Michel de Montaigne betrachtet in seinen "Essais" die Religion weit kritischer. F{\"u}r ihn ist sie eine Instanz, die die Menschen trennt anstatt sie zu vereinen. Er warnt vor ihren zerst{\"o}rerischen Folgen. Gleichwohl entwickelt Montaigne ein Toleranzkonzept, das auf seiner Grund{\"u}berzeugung der Gewaltfreiheit beruht. Es zeigt sich, dass beide Autoren die Religion und ihre N{\"u}tzlichkeit f{\"u}r die Gesellschaft unter verschiedenen Blickwinkeln betrachten.}, subject = {Bodin, Jean}, language = {de} }