@article{RosenstockPerkovicAlexanderetal.2018,
  author    = {Rosenstock, Julio and Perkovic, Vlado and Alexander, John H. and Cooper, Mark E. and Marx, Nikolaus and Pencina, Michael J. and Toto, Robert D. and Wanner, Christoph and Zinman, Bernard and Baanstra, David and Pfarr, Egon and Mattheus, Michaela and Broedl, Uli C. and Woerle, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and George, Jyothis T. and von Eynatten, Maximilian and McGuire, Darren K.},
  title     = {Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the CArdiovascular safety and Renal Microvascular outcomE study with LINAgliptin - (CARMELINA®): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardio-renal risk},
  series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12933-018-0682-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226996},
  pages     = {39, 1-15},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have underrepresented patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to uncertainty regarding their kidney efficacy and safety. The CARMELINA (R) trial aims to evaluate the effects of linagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on both CV and kidney outcomes in a study population enriched for cardio-renal risk. Methods: CARMELINA (R) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in 27 countries in T2D patients at high risk of CV and/or kidney events. Participants with evidence of CKD with or without CV disease and HbA1c 6.5-10.0\% (48-86 mmol/mol) were randomized 1:1 to receive linagliptin once daily or matching placebo, added to standard of care adjusted according to local guidelines. The primary outcome is time to first occurrence of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. The key secondary outcome is a composite of time to first sustained occurrence of end-stage kidney disease, >= 40\% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, or renal death. CV and kidney events are prospectively adjudicated by independent, blinded clinical event committees. CARMELINA (R) was designed to continue until at least 611 participants had confirmed primary outcome events. Assuming a hazard ratio of 1.0, this provides 90\% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of linagliptin versus placebo within the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 1.3 at a one-sided a-level of 2.5\%. If non-inferiority of linagliptin for the primary outcome is demonstrated, then its superiority for both the primary outcome and the key secondary outcome will be investigated with a sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Results: Between July 2013 and August 2016, 6980 patients were randomized and took >= 1 dose of study drug (40.6, 33.1, 16.9, and 9.4\% from Europe, South America, North America, and Asia, respectively). At baseline, mean +/- SD age was 65.8 +/- 9.1 years, HbA1c 7.9 +/- 1.0\%, BMI 31.3 +/- 5.3 kg/m(2), and eGFR 55 +/- 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2). A total of 5148 patients (73.8\%) had prevalent kidney disease (defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or macroalbuminuria [albumin-to-creatinine ratio > 300 mg/g]) and 3990 patients (57.2\%) had established CV disease with increased albuminuria; these characteristics were not mutually exclusive. Microalbuminuria (n = 2896 [41.5\%]) and macroalbuminuria (n = 2691 [38.6\%]) were common. Conclusions: CARMELINA (R) will add important information regarding the CV and kidney disease clinical profile of linagliptin by including an understudied, vulnerable cohort of patients with T2D at highest cardio-renal risk.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuschNadalSchmidetal.2016,
  author    = {Busch, Martin and Nadal, Jennifer and Schmid, Matthias and Paul, Katharina and Titze, Stephanie and H{\"u}bner, Silvia and K{\"o}ttgen, Anna and Schultheiss, Ulla T. and Baid-Agrawal, Seema and Lorenzen, Johan and Schlieper, Georg and Sommerer, Claudia and Krane, Vera and Hilge, Robert and Kielstein, Jan T. and Kronenberg, Florian and Wanner, Christoph and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Wolf, Gunter},
  title     = {Glycaemic control and antidiabetic therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease - cross-sectional data from the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) cohort},
  series = {BMC Nephrology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC Nephrology},
  number    = {59},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12882-016-0273-z},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164687},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Little is known about practice patterns of anti-diabetic therapy in the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and correlates with glycaemic control. We therefore aimed to analyze current antidiabetic treatment and correlates of metabolic control in a large contemporary prospective cohort of patients with diabetes and CKD. Methods The German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study enrolled 5217 patients aged 18-74 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or proteinuria >0.5 g/d. The use of diet prescription, oral anti-diabetic medication, and insulin was assessed at baseline. HbA1c, measured centrally, was the main outcome measure. Results At baseline, DM was present in 1842 patients (35 \%) and the median HbA1C was 7.0 \% (25th-75th percentile: 6.8-7.9 \%), equalling 53 mmol/mol (51, 63); 24.2 \% of patients received dietary treatment only, 25.5 \% oral antidiabetic drugs but not insulin, 8.4 \% oral antidiabetic drugs with insulin, and 41.8 \% insulin alone. Metformin was used by 18.8 \%. Factors associated with an HbA1C level >7.0 \% (53 mmol/mol) were higher BMI (OR = 1.04 per increase of 1 kg/m2, 95 \% CI 1.02-1.06), hemoglobin (OR = 1.11 per increase of 1 g/dL, 95 \% CI 1.04-1.18), treatment with insulin alone (OR = 5.63, 95 \% CI 4.26-7.45) or in combination with oral antidiabetic agents (OR = 4.23, 95 \% CI 2.77-6.46) but not monotherapy with metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors, or glinides. Conclusions Within the GCKD cohort of patients with CKD stage 3 or overt proteinuria, antidiabetic treatment patterns were highly variable with a remarkably high proportion of more than 50 \% receiving insulin-based therapies. Metabolic control was overall satisfactory, but insulin use was associated with higher HbA1C levels.},
  language  = {en}
}