@phdthesis{Hoerner2020,
  author    = {H{\"o}rner, Sven},
  title     = {Empirical Studies on Accounting - Shareholders' Perceptions of Earnings Quality},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-18847},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188473},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Accounting plays an essential role in solving the principal-agent problem between managers and shareholders of capital market-oriented companies through the provision of information by the manager. However, this can succeed only if the accounting information is of high quality. In this context, the perceptions of shareholders regarding earnings quality are of particular importance. The present dissertation intends to contribute to a deeper understanding regarding earnings quality from the perspective of shareholders of capital market-oriented companies. In particular, the thesis deals with indicators of shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality, the influence of the auditor's independence on these perceptions, and the shareholders' assessment of the importance of earnings quality in general. Therefore, this dissertation examines market reactions to earnings announcements, measures of earnings quality and the auditor's independence, as well as shareholders' voting behavior at annual general meetings. Following the introduction and a theoretical part consisting of two chapters, which deal with the purposes of accounting and auditing as well as the relevance of shareholder voting at the annual general meeting in the context of the principal-agent theory, the dissertation presents three empirical studies. The empirical study presented in chapter 4 investigates auditor ratification votes in a U.S. setting. The study addresses the question of whether the results of auditor ratification votes are informative regarding shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality. Using a returns-earnings design, the study demonstrates that the results of auditor ratification votes are associated with market reactions to unexpected earnings at the earnings announcement date. Furthermore, there are indications that this association seems to be positively related to higher levels of information asymmetry between managers and shareholders. Thus, there is empirical support for the notion that the results of auditor ratification votes are earnings-related information that might help shareholders to make informed investment decisions. Chapter 5 investigates the relation between the economic importance of the client and perceived earnings quality. In particular, it is examined whether and when shareholders have a negative perception of an auditor's economic dependence on the client. The results from a Big 4 client sample in the U.S. (fiscal years 2010 through 2014) indicate a negative association between the economic importance of the client and shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality. The results are interpreted to mean that shareholders are still concerned about auditor independence even ten years after the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Furthermore, the association between the economic importance of the client and shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality applies predominantly to the subsample of clients that are more likely to be financially distressed. Therefore, the empirical results reveal that shareholders' perceptions of auditor independence are conditional on the client's circumstances. The study presented in chapter 6 sheds light on the question of whether earnings quality influences shareholders' satisfaction with the members of the company's board. Using data from 1,237 annual general meetings of German listed companies from 2010 through 2015, the study provides evidence that earnings quality - measured by the absolute value of discretionary accruals - is related to shareholders' satisfaction with the company's board. Moreover, the findings imply that shareholders predominantly blame the management board for inferior earnings quality. Overall, the evidence that earnings quality positively influences shareholders' satisfaction emphasizes the relevance of earnings quality.},
  subject      = {Qualit{\"a}t},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Tiede2020,
  author    = {Tiede, Jennifer},
  title     = {Media-related Educational Competencies of German and US Preservice Teachers. A Comparative Analysis of Competency Models, Measurements and Practices of Advancement},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Medienp{\"a}dagogik},
  volume    = {Media-related Educational Competencies},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Medienp{\"a}dagogik},
  issn      = {1424-3636},
  doi       = {10.21240/mpaed/diss.jt.X},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-207093},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  pages     = {1-235},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Media have become omnipresent in children's and youths' everyday lives, and they also offer rich chances and challenges for educational contexts. On the one hand, media can, for example, support students' learning effectively, enhance lessons with innovative tools and methods and help individualize teaching and learning processes. On the other hand, students need to learn, e.g., how to use these media, how to select and evaluate them and how to act responsibly in a digitalized and mediatized world. Teachers are a core stakeholder in this context. To take advantage of the benefits media offer for teaching and learning processes, to support students in the acquisition of respective competencies and to fulfill numerous other media-related tasks and challenges, teachers need to acquire respective competencies in their initial teacher education, which can be summarized as media-related educational competencies. The relevance of these competencies is evident on different levels. In related research, respective competency models are developed, and in practices of teacher education, competencies are measured and efforts are taken to advance the competencies of preservice teachers. Against this background, this semi-cumulative dissertation presents a theory-based and empirical analysis of the competencies in question from a comprehensive and multidimensional perspective. In accordance with the central aspects outlined, the three systematic main fields focused on are models of media-related educational competencies, their measurement and practices of advancement in teacher education, as well as the interplay of these three fields. The dissertation takes on an international comparative perspective and focuses on the examples of initial teacher education in Germany and the USA. The article-based dissertation comprises three main parts, framed by introduction and conclusion. The introduction provides a basis for the following work with regards to terminology, scope of research and overall methodology. The first main part is concerned with models of media-related educational competencies and includes a theory-based systematic comparison of three relevant models. This part explicates the varieties between competency models, and it discusses central aspects of selection and application. In Part II, methods and varieties of competency measurement are focused on, and an article is presented which shares results of an exploratory quantitative measurement of the respective competencies of German and US preservice teachers. Overall, this part reveals the potential and limitations of competency measurement and transfers these conclusions to the competency models introduced in Part I. Part III is concerned with an analysis of current practices of advancing media-related educational competencies in Germany and the USA. In this context, stakeholders influencing these practices will be systemized and analyzed in their role and impact. The article included in Part III introduces interviews which were conducted to achieve insights into the perspectives of selected experts, regarding relevant models, practices and outcomes of media-related teacher education in Germany and the USA. Finally, the Conclusion of the dissertation will draw together the different strands, clarify the close connection between the domains of modeling, measuring and advancing the competencies in question and discuss the interdependencies of these three dimensions. These perspectives help both to contextualize and bring together important facets which have often been treated separately in related research and will add new facets to ultimately achieve a comprehensive and multifaceted viewpoint. Against the background of the intercultural comparative perspective, the results and findings will ultimately achieve an enhanced and deep analysis and reflection on the complex field of media-related educational competencies in Germany and the USA and beyond.},
  subject      = {Medienp{\"a}dagogik},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Mehringer2019,
  author    = {Mehringer, Sarah},
  title     = {Essays on Intergenerational Income Mobility in Germany and the United States},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-16069},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-160693},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This dissertation consists of three contributions. Each addresses one specific aspect of intergenerational income mobility and is intended to be a stand-alone analysis. All chapters use comparable data for Germany and the United States to conduct country comparisons. As there are usually a large number of studies available for the United States, this approach is useful for comparing the empirical results to the existing literature. The first part conducts a direct country comparison of the structure and extent of intergenerational income mobility in Germany and the United States. In line with existing results, the estimated intergenerational income mobility of 0.49 in the United States is significantly higher than that of 0.31 in Germany. While the results for the intergenerational rank mobility are relatively similar, the level of intergenerational income share mobility is higher in the United States than in Germany. There are no significant indications of a nonlinear run of intergenerational income elasticity. A final decomposition of intergenerational income inequality shows both greater income mobility and stronger progressive income growth for Germany compared to the United States. Overall, no clear ranking of the two countries can be identified. To conclude, several economic policy recommendations to increase intergenerational income mobility in Germany are discussed. The second part examines the transmission channels of intergenerational income persistence in Germany and the United States. In principle, there are two ways in which well-off families may influence the adult incomes of their children: first through direct investments in their children's human capital (investment effect ), and second through the indirect transmission of human capital from parents to children (endowment effect ). In order to disentangle these two effects, a descriptive as well as a structural decomposition method are utilized. The results suggest that the investment effect and the endowment effect each account for approximately half of the estimated intergenerational income elasticity in Germany, while the investment effect is substantially more influential in the United States with a share of around 70 percent. With regard to economic policy, these results imply that equality of opportunity for children born to poor parents cannot be reached by the supply of financial means alone. Conversely, an efficient policy must additionally substitute for the missing direct transmission of human capital within socio-economically weak families. The third part explicitly focuses on the intergenerational income mobility among daughters. The restriction to men is commonly made in the empirical literature due to women's lower labor market participation. While most men work full-time, the majority of (married) women still work only part-time or not at all. Especially with the occurrence of assortative mating, daughters from well-off families are likely to marry rich men and might decide to reduce their labor supply as a result. Thus, the individual labor income of a daughter might not be a good indicator for her actual economic status. The baseline regression analysis shows a higher intergenerational income elasticity in Germany and a lower intergenerational income elasticity in the United States for women as compared to men. However, a separation by marital status reveals that in both countries unmarried women exhibit a higher intergenerational income elasticity than unmarried men, while married women feature a lower intergenerational income elasticity than married men. The reason for the lower mobility of unmarried women turns out to be a stronger human capital transmission from fathers to daughters than to sons. The higher mobility of married women is driven by a weaker human capital transmission and a higher labor supply elasticity with respect to spousal income for women as compared to men. In order to further study the effects of assortative mating, the subsample of married children is analyzed by different types of income. It shows that the estimated intergenerational income elasticity of children's household incomes is even higher than that of their individual incomes. This can be seen as an indication for strong assortative mating. If household income is interpreted as a measure of children's actual economic welfare, there are barely any differences between sons and daughters. The intergenerational income elasticity of spousal income with respect to parental income is again relatively high, which in turn supports the hypothesis of strong assortative mating. The elasticity of the sons-in-law with respect to their fathers-in-law in Germany is even higher than that of the sons with respect to their own fathers.},
  subject      = {Deutschland},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Leidner2017,
  author    = {Leidner, Jacob Justus},
  title     = {Empirical Studies on Auditing in Germany and the U.S.},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143901},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Chapter 2 concerns the audit market for German credit institutions (excluding savings banks and cooperative banks), and the presented study allows conclusions to be drawn regarding recent concentration levels of this particular audit market. The last reliable (statistical) studies concerning the audit market for German credit institutions were published several years ago (Grothe 2005; Lenz 1996b; Lenz 1997; Lenz 1998). This is surprising because parts of the new regulations concerning the audit market for public-interest entities—which should also apply to credit institutions (European Commission 2006c)—in Europe would require analyses of the audit market concentration to be performed on a regular basis. Therefore, this study begins to fill this research gap, and it reveals that the audit market for German credit institutions was highly concentrated (market leadership: KPMG AG WPG and PricewaterhouseCoopers AG WPG) in 2006 and 2010. Moreover, the findings also highlight that between these years, neither a notable trend toward higher levels of concentration nor a deconcentration process was evident. Finally, it is illustrated that the regulatory requirements for publishing audit fees and the corresponding right to claim exemption (\S\S 285 Sentence 1 No. 17, 314 (1) No. 9 Commercial Code) do not allow the calculation of concentration figures that cover the entire audit market for credit institutions. Thus, it will continue to be necessary to use surrogates for audit fees, and analyses reveal that the arithmetic mean of the total business volume (or total assets) of a credit institution and its square root is a very good surrogate for calculating concentration measures based on audit fees. Chapter 3 seeks to determine whether public oversight of public-interest entities (PIEs) increases audit fees specifically in the financial industry, which is already a highly regulated industry characterized by intense supervision. To answer this question, a sample of 573 German credit institutions is examined over the 2009-2011 period, as not all credit institutions were considered PIEs in Germany (until very recently). First, the results show that a credit institution's business risk is related to audit fees. In addition, the findings reveal not only that PIE credit institutions pay statistically significantly higher audit fees but also that this effect is economically substantial (representing an audit fee increase of 31.38\%). Finally, there are several indications that the relationship between (other) credit institutions' business risks and audit fees is greater for PIE credit institutions. Chapter 4 examines the association between the results of auditor ratification votes and perceived external financial reporting quality. As has been recently remarked by Wei et al. (2015), far too little is known about shareholders' interests in and perceptions of the election, approval or ratification of auditors. Although auditor ratification by shareholders is normally a routine, non-binding action and the voting ratios are in the range of 95\% or higher, the SEC emphasized the importance of this process by amending the disclosure requirements for such voting results in 2010 (SEC 2009; SEC 2010). This study demonstrates that the results of auditor ratification votes are associated with market reactions to earnings surprises (SEC registrants; 2010 to 2013). Moreover, there are moderate indications that this effect may be positively related to higher levels of information asymmetry between managers and shareholders, that such voting results contain incremental informational content beyond that of other publicly available audit-related information, and that the time lag between the ratification of an auditor and the earnings announcement influences the vote's importance. Finally, the study sheds additional light on an overlooked audit-related topic (e.g., Dao et al. 2012; Hermanson et al. 2009; Krishnan and Ye 2005; Sainty et al. 2002), and illustrates its relation to accounting. More importantly, the provided evidence indicates that disclosure of the results of auditor ratification votes might benefit (prospective) shareholders. Chapter 5 addresses the question of whether and when shareholders may have a negative perception of an auditor's economic dependence on the client. The results for a Big 4 client sample in the U.S. (2010 to 2014) show that the economic importance of the client—measured at the audit office-level—is negatively associated with shareholders' perceptions of external financial reporting quality—measured in terms of the earnings response coefficient and the ex ante cost of equity capital—and, therefore, is perceived as a threat to auditor independence. Moreover, the study reveals that shareholders primarily regard independence due to client dependence as a problem for firms that are more likely to be in financially distressed conditions.},
  subject      = {Deutschland},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Koepke2016,
  author    = {Koepke, Robin},
  title     = {Capital Flows and Financial Stability in Emerging Markets: the Role of U.S. Monetary Policy},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140524},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Die Dissertation besch{\"a}ftigt sich mit den Triebkr{\"a}ften der internationalen Kapitalstr{\"o}me in Schwellenl{\"a}nder sowie den Determinanten von Krisen in Schwellenl{\"a}ndern. Besonderes Augenmerk liegt dabei auf der Rolle der Geldpolitik in den USA. Die Dissertation besteht aus drei eigenst{\"a}ndigen Kapiteln. Kapitel 1 nimmt eine Bestandsaufnahme der umfangreichen empirischen Literatur zu den Triebkr{\"a}ften von Kapitalstr{\"o}men in Schwellenl{\"a}nder vor. Die empirische Evidenz hinsichtlich dieser Triebkr{\"a}fte ist entlang mehrer Dimensionen strukturiert. So werden die Triebkr{\"a}fte entsprechend des etablierten Paradigmas eingeordnet, nachdem zwischen externen Faktoren (z.B. US-Geldpolitik) und internen Faktoren (z.B. Wachstum in Schwellenl{\"a}ndern) unterschieden wird (Calvo et al. 1993). Eine umfassende Auswertung der empirischen Literatur zeigt, dass externe Faktoren Portfolioinvestitionen am meisten beeinflussen, gefolgt von Zufl{\"u}ssen von Banken. F{\"u}r Direktinvestitionen hingegen ist die empirische Evidenz hinsichtlich einer Reihe externer Faktoren nicht eindeutig. Interne Faktoren sind f{\"u}r alle drei Arten von Kapitalstr{\"o}men von erheblicher Bedeutung, insbesondere f{\"u}r Zufl{\"u}sse von Banken. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus unterscheidet die vorliegende Studie zwischen zyklischen und strukturellen Faktoren, die Kapitalstr{\"o}me beeinflussen. Eine historische Analyse deutet darauf hin, dass die Literatur die Bedeutung von zyklischen Faktoren zulasten l{\"a}ngerfristiger struktureller Trends {\"u}berbewertet hat. Kapitel 2 nimmt eine empirische Analyse der Triebkr{\"a}fte von Portfolioinvestitionen in Schwellenl{\"a}ndern vor, mit besonderem Fokus auf die Rolle der Geldpolitik der US-Zentralbank. Dabei werden zwei unterschiedliche Datens{\"a}tze zu hochfrequenten Portfolioinvestitionen mit Hilfe eines Zeitreihenmodells analysiert. Die empirische Analyse zeigt, dass Portfolioinvestitionen erheblich vom {\"U}berraschungsmoment der US-Geldpolitik getrieben werden. Wenn Marktteilnehmer ihre Erwartungen bez{\"u}glich des k{\"u}nftigen Pfades der Leitzinsen ver{\"a}ndern, dann hat dies direkte Auswirkungen auf das Verhalten von Portfolio-Kapitalstr{\"o}men. Eine Verschiebung der erwarteten Leitzinsen nach unten [nach oben] erh{\"o}ht [vermindert] die Portfoliozufl{\"u}sse in Schwellenl{\"a}nder. Dieses Ergebnis legt eine neue Interpretation der Rolle der US-Geldpolitik nahe. In der gegenw{\"a}rtigen Literatur besteht die zentrale {\"U}berzeugung hinsichtlich der Rolle der US-Geldpolitik darin, dass sich eine Erh{\"o}hung der Leitzinsen negativ auf Kapitalfl{\"u}sse in Schwellenl{\"a}nder auswirkt, unabh{\"a}ngig davon wie schnell die Leitzinsen erh{\"o}ht werden (z.B. Fernandez-Arias 1996). Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Arbeit hingegen deuten darauf hin, dass eine Straffung der US-Geldpolitik sich nicht notwendigerweise negativ auf Portfolioinvestitionen auswirkt. Negative Effekte bleiben insbesondere dann aus, wenn eine Zinserh{\"o}hung von den Marktteilnehmern bereits erwartetet und somit eingepreist war. Eine Erh{\"o}hung der Leitzinsen kann sogar mit positiven Effekten auf Kapitalstr{\"o}me einhergehen, n{\"a}mlich dann, wenn sie von einer Abw{\"a}rtsbewegung im erwarteten Pfad der Leitzinsen begleitet ist (zum Beispiel weil die Zentralbank signalisiert, dass weitere Zinserh{\"o}hungen nicht zu erwarten sind). Umgekehrt kann die US-Geldpolitik Portfolioinvestitionen auch ohne eine Erh{\"o}hung der Leitzinsen beeintr{\"a}chtigen, n{\"a}mlich dann, wenn Marktteilnehmer ihre Erwartungen hinsichtlich der k{\"u}nftigen Leitzinsen nach oben revidieren. Kapitel 3 untersucht die Rolle der US-Geldpolitik hinsichtlich ihres Einflusses auf das Auftreten von Krisen in Schwellenl{\"a}ndern. Es werden ein negativ-binomisches Z{\"a}hlmodell und ein Panel-Logitmodell {\"o}konometrisch gesch{\"a}tzt, um die Determinanten von W{\"a}hrungskrisen, Bankenkrisen und Staatsbankrotten in 27 Schwellenl{\"a}ndern zu analysieren. Die Sch{\"a}tzergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Krisen wesentlich h{\"o}her ist, (1) wenn die US-Leitzinsen {\"u}ber ihrem nat{\"u}rlichen Niveau liegen, (2) w{\"a}hrend Zinsanhebungszyklen, und (3) wenn Marktteilnehmer von Signalen {\"u}berrascht werden, dass die US-Zentralbank die Leitzinsen schneller als erwartet anheben wird. Diese Ergebnisse stehen im Gegensatz zur bestehenden Literatur, die interne Faktoren in Schwellenl{\"a}ndern als die dominante Ursache von Krisen ansieht (z.B. Gourinchas und Obstfeld 2012). Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie weisen auch auf ein erh{\"o}htes Risiko von Krisen in Schwellenl{\"a}ndern in den kommenden Jahren hin, wenn die US-Zentralbank wie erwartet die Leitzinsen weiterhin graduell anheben wird.},
  subject      = {Internationale Kapitalbewegung},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Gerend2012,
  author    = {Gerend, Jennifer},
  title     = {U.S. and German Approaches to Regulating Retail Development: Urban Planning Tools and Local Policies},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-70257},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {This dissertation examines retail development regulation in the U.S. and in Germany, comparing the various urban planning tools and policies in use by municipal governments. These similarities and differences are explored through research into three case study cities in each country, with special attention paid to how these governments regulate large-scale or "big box" retail.},
  subject      = {Einzelhandel},
  language  = {en}
}