@article{StraubStapfFischeretal.2022,
  author    = {Straub, Anton and Stapf, Maximilian and Fischer, Markus and Vollmer, Andreas and Linz, Christian and L{\^a}m, Thi{\^e}n-Tr{\´i} and K{\"u}bler, Alexander and Brands, Roman C. and Scherf-Clavel, Oliver and Hartmann, Stefan},
  title     = {Bone concentration of ampicillin/sulbactam: a pilot study in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw},
  series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  number    = {22},
  issn      = {1660-4601},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijerph192214917},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297413},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) occurs typically after irradiation of the head and neck area or after the intake of antiresorptive agents. Both interventions can lead to compromised bone perfusion and can ultimately result in infection and necrosis. Treatment usually consists of surgical necrosectomy and prolonged antibiotic therapy, usually through beta-lactams such as ampicillin/sulbactam. The poor blood supply in particular raises the question as to whether this form of antibiosis can achieve sufficient concentrations in the bone. Therefore, we investigated the antibiotic concentration in plasma and bone samples in a prospective study. Bone samples were collected from the necrosis core and in the vital surrounding bone. The measured concentrations in plasma for ampicillin and sulbactam were 126.3 ± 77.6 and 60.2 ± 35.0 µg/mL, respectively. In vital bone and necrotic bone samples, the ampicillin/sulbactam concentrations were 6.3 ± 7.8/1.8 ± 2.0 µg/g and 4.9 ± 7.0/1.7 ± 1.7 µg/g, respectively. These concentrations are substantially lower than described in the literature. However, the concentration seems sufficient to kill most bacteria, such as Streptococci and Staphylococci, which are mostly present in the biofilm of ONJ. We, therefore, conclude that intravenous administration of ampicillin/sulbactam remains a valuable treatment in the therapy of ONJ. Nevertheless, increasing resistance of Escherichia coli towards beta-lactam antibiotics have been reported and should be considered.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchrueferBrockowStoevesandtetal.2020,
  author    = {Schr{\"u}fer, Philipp and Brockow, Knut and Stoevesandt, Johanna and Trautmann, Axel},
  title     = {Predominant patterns of beta-lactam hypersensitivity in a single German Allergy Center: exanthem induced by aminopenicillins, anaphylaxis by cephalosporins},
  series = {Allergy, Asthma \& Clinical Immunology},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Allergy, Asthma \& Clinical Immunology},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13223-020-00488-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231306},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Penicillins and other beta-lactam antibiotics are the most common elicitors of allergic drug reaction. However, data on the pattern of clinical reaction types elicited by specific beta-lactams are scarce and inconsistent. We aimed to determine patterns of beta-latam allergy, i.e. the association of a clinical reaction type with a specific beta-lactam antibiotic. Methods We retrospectively evaluated data from 800 consecutive patients with suspected beta-lactam hypersensitivity over a period of 11 years in a single German Allergy Center. Results beta-lactam hypersensitivity was definitely excluded in 595 patients, immediate-type (presumably IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 70 and delayed-type hypersensitivity in 135 cases. Most (59 out of 70, 84.3\%) immediate-type anaphylactic reactions were induced by a limited number of cephalosporins. Delayed reactions were regularly caused by an aminopenicillin (127 out of 135, 94.1\%) and usually manifested as a measles-like exanthem (117 out of 135, 86.7\%). Intradermal testing proved to be the most useful method for diagnosing beta-lactam allergy, but prick testing was already positive in 24 out of 70 patients with immediate-type hypersensitivity (34.3\%). Patch testing in addition to intradermal testing did not provide additional information for the diagnosis of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Almost all beta-lactam allergic patients tolerated at least one, usually several alternative substances out of the beta-lactam group. Conclusions We identified two patterns of beta-lactam hypersensitivity: aminopenicillin-induced exanthem and anaphylaxis triggered by certain cephalosporins. Intradermal skin testing was the most useful method to detect both IgE-mediated and delayed-type beta-lactam hypersensitivity.},
  language  = {en}
}