@article{KruegerLeskienSchulleretal.2021,
  author    = {Kr{\"u}ger, S{\"o}ren and Leskien, Miriam and Schuller, Patricia and Prifert, Christiane and Weißbrich, Benedikt and Vogel, Ulrich and Krone, Manuel},
  title     = {Performance and feasibility of universal PCR admission screening for SARS-CoV-2 in a German tertiary care hospital},
  series = {Journal of Medical Virology},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Journal of Medical Virology},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1002/jmv.26770},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-238971},
  pages     = {2890 -- 2898},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Anamnestic screening of symptoms and contact history is applied to identify coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on admission. However, asymptomatic and presymptomatic patients remain undetected although the viral load may be high. In this retrospective cohort study, all hospitalized patients who received polymerase chain reaction (PCR) admission testing from March 26th until May 24th, 2020 were included. Data on COVID-19-specific symptoms and contact history to COVID-19 cases were retrospectively extracted from patient files and from contact tracing notes. The compliance to the universal testing protocol was high with 90\%. Out of 6940 tested patients, 27 new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infections (0.4\%) were detected. Seven of those COVID-19 cases (26\% of all new cases) were asymptomatic and had no positive contact history, but were identified through a positive PCR test. The number needed to identify an asymptomatic patient was 425 in the first wave of the epidemic, 1218 in the low incidence phase. The specificity of the method was above 99.9\%. Universal PCR testing was highly accepted by staff as demonstrated by high compliance. The costs to detect one asymptomatic case in future studies need to be traded off against the costs and damage caused by potential outbreaks of COVID-19.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StockPetrašMelteretal.2016,
  author    = {Stock, Nina Katharina and Petr{\´a}š, Petr and Melter, Oto and Kapounov{\´a}, Gabriela and Vopalkov{\´a}, Petra and Kubele, Jan and Vaniš, V{\´a}clav and Tkadlec, Jan and Buk{\´a}čkov{\´a}, Eva and Machov{\´a}, Ivana and Jindr{\´a}k, Vlastimil},
  title     = {Importance of Multifaceted Approaches in Infection Control: A Practical Experience from an Outbreak Investigation},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0157981},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166891},
  pages     = {e0157981},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background This study presents the results of a multidisciplinary, nosocomial MRSA outbreak investigation in an 8-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU). The identification of seven MRSA positive patients in the beginning of 2014 led to the closure of the ward for several weeks. A multidisciplinary, retrospective investigation was initiated in order to identify the reason and the source for the outbreak, describe MRSA transmission in the department and identify limitations in infection control. Methods The investigation comprised an epidemiological description of MRSA cases from 2012 to 2014 and a characterization of MRSA isolates, including phage-, spa- and PFGE-typing. Additionally, MRSA screening was performed from the hospital staff and the environment. To identify the reason for the outbreak, work-related, psychological and behavioral factors were investigated by impartial audits and staff interviews. Results Thirty-one MRSA cases were registered during the study period, and 36 isolates were investigated. Molecular typing determined the outbreak strain (phage type 54/812, PFGE type A4, spa type t003) and identified the probable index case. Nasal carriage in one employee and a high environmental contamination with the outbreak strain was documented. Important gaps in nursing procedures and general management were identified. Elevated stress levels and communication problems preceded the outbreak. Compliance with hand hygiene and isolation procedures was evaluated as appropriate. Conclusion This study demonstrates the complexity of controlling hospital-associated infections. The combined use of different typing methods is beneficial for outbreak investigations. Psychological, behavioral and other work-related factors have an important impact on the spread of nosocomial pathogens. These factors should be addressed and integrated in routine infection control practice.},
  language  = {en}
}