@article{LodhaErhardDoelkenetal.2022,
  author    = {Lodha, Manivel and Erhard, Florian and D{\"o}lken, Lars and Prusty, Bhupesh K.},
  title     = {The hidden enemy within: non-canonical peptides in virus-induced autoimmunity},
  series = {Frontiers in Microbiology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Microbiology},
  issn      = {1664-302X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fmicb.2022.840911},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-263053},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Viruses play a key role in explaining the pathogenesis of various autoimmune disorders, whose underlying principle is defined by the activation of autoreactive T-cells. In many cases, T-cells escape self-tolerance due to the failure in encountering certain MHC-I self-peptide complexes at substantial levels, whose peptides remain invisible from the immune system. Over the years, contribution of unstable defective ribosomal products (DRiPs) in immunosurveillance has gained prominence. A class of unstable products emerge from non-canonical translation and processing of unannotated mammalian and viral ORFs and their peptides are cryptic in nature. Indeed, high throughput sequencing and proteomics have revealed that a substantial portion of our genomes comprise of non-canonical ORFs, whose generation is significantly modulated during disease. Many of these ORFs comprise short ORFs (sORFs) and upstream ORFs (uORFs) that resemble DRiPs and may hence be preferentially presented. Here, we discuss how such products, normally "hidden" from the immune system, become abundant in viral infections activating autoimmune T-cells, by discussing their emerging role in infection and disease. Finally, we provide a perspective on how these mechanisms can explain several autoimmune disorders in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SianHulsmannRiederer2021,
  author    = {Sian-Hulsmann, Jeswinder and Riederer, Peter},
  title     = {The nigral coup in Parkinson's Disease by α-synuclein and its associated rebels},
  series = {Cells},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Cells},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2073-4409},
  doi       = {10.3390/cells10030598},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234073},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The risk of Parkinson's disease increases with age. However, the etiology of the illness remains obscure. It appears highly likely that the neurodegenerative processes involve an array of elements that influence each other. In addition, genetic, endogenous, or exogenous toxins need to be considered as viable partners to the cellular degeneration. There is compelling evidence that indicate the key involvement of modified α-synuclein (Lewy bodies) at the very core of the pathogenesis of the disease. The accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein may be a consequence of some genetic defect or/and a failure of the protein clearance system. Importantly, α-synuclein pathology appears to be a common denominator for many cellular deleterious events such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, dopamine synaptic dysregulation, iron dyshomeostasis, and neuroinflammation. These factors probably employ a common apoptotic/or autophagic route in the final stages to execute cell death. The misfolded α-synuclein inclusions skillfully trigger or navigate these processes and thus amplify the dopamine neuron fatalities. Although the process of neuroinflammation may represent a secondary event, nevertheless, it executes a fundamental role in neurodegeneration. Some viral infections produce parkinsonism and exhibit similar characteristic neuropathological changes such as a modest brain dopamine deficit and α-synuclein pathology. Thus, viral infections may heighten the risk of developing PD. Alternatively, α-synuclein pathology may induce a dysfunctional immune system. Thus, sporadic Parkinson's disease is caused by multifactorial trigger factors and metabolic disturbances, which need to be considered for the development of potential drugs in the disorder.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EisenreichRudelHeesemannetal.2019,
  author    = {Eisenreich, Wolfgang and Rudel, Thomas and Heesemann, J{\"u}rgen and Goebel, Werner},
  title     = {How viral and intracellular bacterial pathogens reprogram the metabolism of host cells to allow their intracellular replication},
  series = {Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology},
  issn      = {2235-2988},
  doi       = {10.3389/fcimb.2019.00042},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-197188},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Viruses and intracellular bacterial pathogens (IBPs) have in common the need of suitable host cells for efficient replication and proliferation during infection. In human infections, the cell types which both groups of pathogens are using as hosts are indeed quite similar and include phagocytic immune cells, especially monocytes/macrophages (MOs/MPs) and dendritic cells (DCs), as well as nonprofessional phagocytes, like epithelial cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. These terminally differentiated cells are normally in a metabolically quiescent state when they are encountered by these pathogens during infection. This metabolic state of the host cells does not meet the extensive need for nutrients required for efficient intracellular replication of viruses and especially IBPs which, in contrast to the viral pathogens, have to perform their own specific intracellular metabolism to survive and efficiently replicate in their host cell niches. For this goal, viruses and IBPs have to reprogram the host cell metabolism in a pathogen-specific manner to increase the supply of nutrients, energy, and metabolites which have to be provided to the pathogen to allow its replication. In viral infections, this appears to be often achieved by the interaction of specific viral factors with central metabolic regulators, including oncogenes and tumor suppressors, or by the introduction of virus-specific oncogenes. Less is so far known on the mechanisms leading to metabolic reprogramming of the host cell by IBPs. However, the still scant data suggest that similar mechanisms may also determine the reprogramming of the host cell metabolism in IBP infections. In this review, we summarize and compare the present knowledge on this important, yet still poorly understood aspect of pathogenesis of human viral and especially IBP infections.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SarukhanyanShityakovDandekar2018,
  author    = {Sarukhanyan, Edita and Shityakov, Sergey and Dandekar, Thomas},
  title     = {In silico designed Axl receptor blocking drug candidates against Zika virus infection},
  series = {ACS Omega},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {ACS Omega},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1021/acsomega.8b00223},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176739},
  pages     = {5281-5290},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {After a large outbreak in Brazil, novel drugs against Zika virus became extremely necessary. Evaluation of virus-based pharmacological strategies concerning essential host factors brought us to the idea that targeting the Axl receptor by blocking its dimerization function could be critical for virus entry. Starting from experimentally validated compounds, such as RU-301, RU-302, warfarin, and R428, we identified a novel compound 2′ (R428 derivative) to be the most potent for this task amongst a number of alternative compounds and leads. The improved affinity of compound 2′ was confirmed by molecular docking as well as molecular dynamics simulation techniques using implicit solvation models. The current study summarizes a new possibility for inhibition of the Axl function as a potential target for future antiviral therapies.},
  language  = {en}
}