@article{KippnichSchorscherKredeletal.2020,
  author    = {Kippnich, Maximilian and Schorscher, Nora and Kredel, Markus and Markus, Christian and Eden, Lars and Gassenmaier, Tobias and Lock, Johann and Wurmb, Thomas},
  title     = {Dual‑room twin‑CT scanner in multiple trauma care: first results after implementation in a level one trauma centre},
  series = {European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery},
  journal   = {European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery},
  issn      = {1863-9933},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00068-020-01374-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232390},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose The trauma centre of the Wuerzburg University Hospital has integrated a pioneering dual-room twin-CT scanner in a multiple trauma pathway. For concurrent treatment of two trauma patients, two carbon CT examination and intervention tables are positioned head to head with one sliding CT-Gantry in the middle. The focus of this study is the process of trauma care with the time to CT (tCT) and the time to operation (tOR) as quality indicator. Methods All patients with suspected multiple trauma, who required emergency surgery and who were initially diagnosed by the CT trauma protocol between 05/2018 and 12/2018 were included. Data relating to time spans (tCT and tOR), severity of injury and outcome was obtained. Results 110 of the 589 screened trauma patients had surgery immediately after finishing primary assessment in the ER. The ISS was 17 (9-34) (median and interquartile range, IQR). tCT was 15 (11-19) minutes (median and IQR) and tOR was 96.5 (75-119) minutes (median and IQR). In the first 30 days, seven patients died (6.4\%) including two within the first 24 h (2\%). There were two ICU days (1-6) (median and IQR) and one (0-1) (median and IQR) ventilator day. Conclusion The twin-CT technology is a fascinating tool to organize high-quality trauma care for two multiple trauma patients simultaneously},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HerrmannAdamNotzetal.2020,
  author    = {Herrmann, Johannes and Adam, Elisabeth Hannah and Notz, Quirin and Helmer, Philipp and Sonntagbauer, Michael and Ungemach-Papenberg, Peter and Sanns, Andreas and Zausig, York and Steinfeldt, Thorsten and Torje, Iuliu and Schmid, Benedikt and Schlesinger, Tobias and Rolfes, Caroline and Reyher, Christian and Kredel, Markus and Stumpner, Jan and Brack, Alexander and Wurmb, Thomas and Gill-Schuster, Daniel and Kranke, Peter and Weismann, Dirk and Klinker, Hartwig and Heuschmann, Peter and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Frantz, Stefan and Ertl, Georg and Muellenbach, Ralf Michael and Mutlak, Haitham and Meybohm, Patrick and Zacharowski, Kai and Lotz, Christopher},
  title     = {COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome — A Multicenter Observational Study},
  series = {Frontiers in Medicine},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Medicine},
  issn      = {2296-858X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fmed.2020.599533},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219834},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included. Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0\%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5\%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3\%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay. Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LotzNotzKrankeetal.2020,
  author    = {Lotz, Christopher and Notz, Quirin and Kranke, Peter and Kredel, Markus and Meybohm, Patrick},
  title     = {Unconventional approaches to mechanical ventilation - step-by-step through the COVID-19 crisis},
  series = {Critical Care},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Critical Care},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13054-020-02954-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229868},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchlesingerWeissbrichWedekinketal.2020,
  author    = {Schlesinger, Tobias and Weißbrich, Benedikt and Wedekink, Florian and Notz, Quirin and Herrmann, Johannes and Krone, Manuel and Sitter, Magdalena and Schmid, Benedikt and Kredel, Markus and Stumpner, Jan and D{\"o}lken, Lars and Wischhusen, J{\"o}rg and Kranke, Peter and Meybohm, Patrick and Lotz, Christpher},
  title     = {Biodistribution and serologic response in SARS-CoV-2 induced ARDS: A cohort study},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {15, 2020},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0242917},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231348},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The viral load and tissue distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain important questions. The current study investigated SARS-CoV-2 viral load, biodistribution and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody formation in patients suffering from severe corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods This is a retrospective single-center study in 23 patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS. Data were collected within routine intensive care. SARS-CoV-2 viral load was assessed via reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Overall, 478 virology samples were taken. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody detection of blood samples was performed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Most patients (91\%) suffered from severe ARDS during ICU treatment with a 30-day mortality of 30\%. None of the patients received antiviral treatment. Tracheal aspirates tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 100\% of the cases, oropharyngeal swabs only in 77\%. Blood samples were positive in 26\% of the patients. No difference of viral load was found in tracheal or blood samples with regard to 30-day survival or disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 was never found in dialysate. Serologic testing revealed significantly lower concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing IgM and IgA antibodies in survivors compared to non-survivors (p = 0.009). Conclusions COVID-19 induced ARDS is accompanied by a high viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in tracheal aspirates, which remained detectable in the majority throughout intensive care treatment. Remarkably, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was never detected in dialysate even in patients with RNAemia. Viral load or the buildup of neutralizing antibodies was not associated with 30-day survival or disease severity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LehmannOehlerZuberetal.2020,
  author    = {Lehmann, Martin and Oehler, Beatrice and Zuber, Jonas and Malzahn, Uwe and Walles, Thorsten and Muellenbach, Ralf M. and Roewer, Norbert and Kredel, Markus},
  title     = {Redistribution of pulmonary ventilation after lung surgery detected with electrical impedance tomography},
  series = {Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica},
  volume    = {64},
  journal   = {Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1111/aas.13525},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213575},
  pages     = {517-525},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background: Regional ventilation of the lung can be visualized by pulmonary electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The aim of this study was to examine the post-operative redistribution of regional ventilation after lung surgery dependent on the side of surgery and its association with forced vital capacity. Methods: In this prospective, observational cohort study 13 patients undergoing right and 13 patients undergoing left-sided open or video-thoracoscopic procedures have been investigated. Pre-operative measurements with EIT and spirometry were compared with data obtained 3 days post-operation. The center of ventilation (COV) within a 32 × 32 pixel matrix was calculated from EIT data. The transverse axis coordinate of COV, COVx (left/right), was modified to COVx′ (ipsilateral/contralateral). Thus, COVx′ shows a negative change if ventilation shifts contralateral independent of the side of surgery. This enabled testing with two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements (side, time). Results: The perioperative shift of COVx′ was dependent on the side of surgery (P = .007). Ventilation shifted away from the side of surgery after the right-sided surgery (COVx′-1.97 pixel matrix points, P < .001), but not after the left-sided surgery (COVx′-0.61, P = .425). The forced vital capacity (\%predicted) decreased from 94 (83-109)\% (median [quartiles]; [left-sided]) and 89 (80-97)\% (right-sided surgery) to 61 (59-66)\% and 62 (40-72)\% (P < .05), respectively. The perioperative changes in forced vital capacity (\%predicted) were weakly associated with the shift of COVx′. Conclusion: Only after right-sided lung surgery, EIT showed reduced ventilation on the side of surgery while vital capacity was markedly reduced in both groups.},
  language  = {en}
}