@article{LudwigReymusWinkleretal.2023,
  author    = {Ludwig, Julia and Reymus, Marcel and Winkler, Alexander and Soliman, Sebastian and Krug, Ralf and Krastl, Gabriel},
  title     = {Root maturation of an immature dens invaginatus despite unsuccessful revitalization procedure: a case report and recommendations for educational purposes},
  series = {Dentistry Journal},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Dentistry Journal},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2304-6767},
  doi       = {10.3390/dj11020047},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304108},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background: The clinical management of teeth with complex dens invaginatus (DI) malformations and apical periodontitis may be challenging due to the lack of routine. The aim of this case report is to describe the endodontic treatment of an immature tooth with DI and to discuss strategies for preclinical training for teeth with such malformations. Case report: A 9-year-old male presented with an immature maxillary incisor with DI (Oehlers Type II) and apical periodontitis which was diagnosed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Revitalization was initially attempted but then abandoned after failure to generate a stable blood clot. Nevertheless, considerable increase in both root length and thickness could be detected after medication with calcium hydroxide followed by root canal filling with MTA as an apical plug. Conclusions: The endodontic management of teeth with DI requires thorough treatment planning. In immature teeth, under certain conditions, root maturation may occur even with conventional apexification procedures. From an educational perspective, different strategies including CBCT and 3D-printed transparent tooth models for visualization of the complex internal morphology and redesigned 3D-printed replica with various degrees of difficulty for endodontic training, can be used to overcome the challenges associated with endodontic treatment of such teeth.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ReymusStawarczykWinkleretal.2020,
  author    = {Reymus, M. and Stawarczyk, B. and Winkler, A. and Ludwig, J. and Kess, S. and Krastl, G. and Krug, R.},
  title     = {A critical evaluation of the material properties and clinical suitability of in-house printed and commercial tooth replicas for endodontic training},
  series = {International Endodontic Journal},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {International Endodontic Journal},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1111/iej.13361},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218085},
  pages     = {1446 -- 1454},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Aim To assess the suitability of several 3D-printed resins for the manufacturing of tooth replicas for endodontic training in comparison with commercially available replicas by analysing the properties of the materials and comparing them with real teeth during endodontic training. Methodology Tooth replicas were 3D-printed using four resins (NextDent Model, NextDent C\&B, V-Print ee and Vero White Plus) and compared with two commercially available products (VDW and Smile Factory) as well as extracted human teeth. Martens hardness, indentation modulus and radiopacity were investigated on these tooth replicas. Experienced dentists evaluated the suitability of the replicas for endodontic training by comparing them with real teeth in terms of appearance, anatomy, radiopacity, similarity to dentine during access opening, canal gauging and canal instrumentation. Data were analysed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results The greatest hardness values were recorded for human dentine (P < 0.001), followed by V-Print ee and the commercial tooth replica of Smile Factory. The greatest radiopacity was associated with VOC and dentine (P < 0.001) in comparison with the other materials tested. The appearance of the in-house printed tooth replicas was subjectively evaluated by the dentists as being more realistic than the commercially available products. No differences between the replicas was detected during mechanical instrumentation of root canals. Conclusion None of the tooth replicas were able to simulate human dentine from the perspectives evaluated. V-Print ee had radiopacity comparable with dentine, but its hardness was not comparable with dentine.},
  language  = {en}
}