@phdthesis{Guenzel2009,
  author    = {Guenzel, Carolin Alexandra},
  title     = {The Characterization of Nipah Virus V and W proteins},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-37627},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {The work of the previous chapters describes the role of Nipah virus (NiV) V and W proteins regarding their role in interferon antagonism and regulation of viral replication. Previous publications have shown that NiV encodes IFN antagonist activity in its V, W and C protein (Park et al., 2003b; Rodriguez et al., 2002). In order to study the effect of both NiV proteins in the context of a virus infection, recombinant Newcastle disease viruses (rNDVs) expressing NiV V or NiV W were constructed. As a control virus served rNDV expressing NDV V proteins, which behaved like wildtype NDV. Growth kinetic experiments demonstrated that rNDVs expressing NiV V or W grew to higher titers than rNDV expressing NDV V in human A549 cells. This result suggested that both NiV V and W were able to render the avian virus, which normally does not replicate well in human cells, into a better growing virus. This hypothesis was supported by the fact that all rNDVs grew similarly in avian DF1 or Vero cells. When rNDV-infected A549 cells were specifically stained for NiV V or W protein it was observed that V is localized in the cytoplasm whereas W could be predominantly found in the nucleus. This observation was in agreement with previous studies reporting a nucleus export signal (NES) for NiV V and a nuclear localization signal (NLS) for NiV W (Rodriguez et al., 2004; Shaw et al., 2005). The specific localization of each NiV protein has also been shown to contribute to different functions in terms of IFN antagonism (Shaw et al., 2005). Here, NiV V and W proteins caused a severe attenuation of the immune response in rNDV-infected human A549 and dendritic cells. The transcription of type I interferons and ISGs was significantly downregulated in the presence of NiV V and W proteins. As a consequence of the transcriptional block, there was also an inhibition at the level of translation (as seen for A549 cells) and the secretion of IFNs and cytokines/chemokines (as seen for DCs). In contrast, NDV V protein induced a host immune response. Both NiV V and W also displayed a strong inhibitory effect on the function DCs. DCs represent a very important cell class because they link the innate immune response to the adaptive immune response (Banchereau \& Steinman, 1998). By downregulating the production and secretion of important cytokines/chemokines that are important for the activation of B and T lymphocytes, NiV V and W were able to disrupt that link. Interestingly, NiV W seemed to be a stronger inhibitor than NiV V in both A549 cells and DCs. Overall, it was demonstrated that NiV V and W were able to prevent the induction of the innate and adaptive host immune response cascade by inhibiting the transcription of immune genes in DCs and A549 cells. The second part of this work addressed the question whether NiV V and W proteins have a regulatory role in viral replication. This has been previously reported for Nipah virus itself (Sleeman et al., 2008) and other viruses (Atreya et al., 1998; Horikami et al., 1996; Witko et al., 2006). In order to study the ability of the V and W proteins of NiV to regulate viral transcription and/or replication, an existing NiV minireplicon assay was used (Halpin et al., 2004). Here, it was shown that NiV V and W (but not C) proteins significantly downregulated NiV minireplicon activity. The common N terminal region was shown to harbor the inhibitory activity. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that both NiV V and W (but not C) were able to interact with NiV N, one component of the NiV polymerase. This result was supported by immunofluorescence experiments that revealed co-localization of NiV N with V and W. The binding of NiV V or W to NiV N occurred via their N terminus and more specifically amino acids 1-50. This suggested that V and W might inhibit viral replication by interacting with the viral polymerase resulting in a loss of function. Exact mechanisms still have to be elucidated.},
  subject      = {Viren},
  language  = {en}
}