@article{MuellerBrillHagenetal.2012,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Joachim and Brill, Stefan and Hagen, Rudolf and Moeltner, Alexander and Brockmeier, Steffi-Johanna and Stark, Thomas and Helbig, Silke and Maurer, Jan and Zahnert, Thomas and Zierhofer, Clemens and Nopp, Peter and Anderson, Ilona},
  title     = {Clinical Trial Results with the MED-EL Fine Structure Processing Coding Strategy in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users},
  series = {ORL},
  volume    = {74},
  journal   = {ORL},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {0301-1569},
  doi       = {10.1159/000337089},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-196396},
  pages     = {185-198},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Objectives: To assess the subjective and objective performance of the new fine structure processing strategy (FSP) compared to the previous generation coding strategies CIS+ and HDCIS. Methods: Forty-six adults with a minimum of 6 months of cochlear implant experience were included. CIS+, HDCIS and FSP were compared in speech perception tests in noise, pitch scaling and questionnaires. The randomized tests were performed acutely (interval 1) and again after 3 months of FSP experience (interval 3). The subjective evaluation included questionnaire 1 at intervals 1 and 3, and questionnaire 2 at interval 2, 1 month after interval 1. Results: Comparison between FSP and CIS+ showed that FSP performed at least as well as CIS+ in all speech perception tests, and outperformed CIS+ in vowel and monosyllabic word discrimination. Comparison between FSP and HDCIS showed that both performed equally well in all speech perception tests. Pitch scaling showed that FSP performed at least as well as HDCIS. With FSP, sound quality was at least as good and often better than with HDCIS. Conclusions: Results indicate that FSP performs better than CIS+ in vowel and monosyllabic word understanding. Subjective evaluation demonstrates strong user preferences for FSP when listening to speech and music.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZahnertLoewenheimBeutneretal.2016,
  author    = {Zahnert, Thomas and L{\"o}wenheim, Hubert and Beutner, Dirk and Hagen, Rudolf and Ernst, Arneborg and Pau, Hans-Wilhelm and Zehlicke, Thorsten and K{\"u}hne, Hilke and Friese, Natascha and Tropitzsch, Anke and L{\"u}ers, Jan-Christoffer and Mlynski, Robert and Todt, Ingo and H{\"u}ttenbrink, Karl-Bernd},
  title     = {Multicenter Clinical Trial of Vibroplasty Couplers to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss: First Results},
  series = {Audiology and Neurotology},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Audiology and Neurotology},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1420-3030},
  doi       = {10.1159/000444616},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-199129},
  pages     = {212-222},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of round window (RW), oval window (OW), CliP and Bell couplers for use with an active middle ear implant. Methods: This is a multicenter, long-term, prospective trial with consecutive enrollment, involving 6 university hospitals in Germany. Bone conduction, air conduction, implant-aided warble-tone thresholds and Freiburger monosyllable word recognition scores were compared with unaided preimplantation results in 28 moderate-to-profound hearing-impaired patients after 12 months of follow-up. All patients had previously undergone failed reconstruction surgeries (up to 5 or more). In a subset of patients, additional speech tests at 12 months postoperatively were used to compare the aided with the unaided condition after implantation with the processor switched off. An established quality-of-life questionnaire for hearing aids was used to determine patient satisfaction. Results: Postoperative bone conduction remained stable. Mean functional gain for all couplers was 37 dB HL (RW = 42 dB, OW = 35 dB, Bell = 38 dB, CliP = 27 dB). The mean postoperative Freiburger monosyllable score was 71\% at 65 dB SPL. The postimplantation mean SRT<sub>50</sub> (speech reception in quiet for 50\% understanding of words in sentences) improved on average by 23 dB over unaided testing and signal-to-noise ratios also improved in all patients. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)quality-of-life questionnaire was scored very positively by all patients. Conclusion: A significant improvement was seen with all couplers, and patients were satisfied with the device at 12 months postoperatively. These results demonstrate that an active implant is an advantage in achieving good hearing benefit in patients with prior failed reconstruction surgery.},
  language  = {en}
}