@article{AppelHardaker2021,
  author    = {Appel, Alexandra and Hardaker, Sina},
  title     = {Strategies in Times of Pandemic Crisis — Retailers and Regional Resilience in W{\"u}rzburg, Germany},
  series = {Sustainability},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Sustainability},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {2071-1050},
  doi       = {10.3390/su13052643},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233991},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Research on the COVID-19 crisis and its implications on regional resilience is still in its infancy. To understand resilience on its aggregate level it is important to identify (non)resilient actions of individual actors who comprise regions. As the retail sector among others represents an important factor in an urban regions recovery, we focus on the resilience of (textile) retailers within the city of W{\"u}rzburg in Germany to the COVID-19 pandemic. To address the identified research gap, this paper applies the concept of resilience. Firstly, conducting expert interviews, the individual (textile) retailers' level and their strategies in coping with the crisis is considered. Secondly, conducting a contextual analysis of the German city of W{\"u}rzburg, we wish to contribute to the discussion of how the resilience of a region is influenced inter alia by actors. Our study finds three main strategies on the individual level, with retailers: (1) intending to "bounce back" to a pre-crisis state, (2) reorganising existing practices, as well as (3) closing stores and winding up business. As at the time of research, no conclusions regarding long-term impacts and resilience are possible, the results are limited. Nevertheless, detailed analysis of retailers' strategies contributes to a better understanding of regional resilience.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BartmannFischerHuebneretal.2021,
  author    = {Bartmann, Catharina and Fischer, Leah-Maria and H{\"u}bner, Theresa and M{\"u}ller-Reiter, Max and W{\"o}ckel, Achim and McNeill, Rhiannon V. and Schlaiss, Tanja and Kittel-Schneider, Sarah and K{\"a}mmerer, Ulrike and Diessner, Joachim},
  title     = {The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological stress in breast cancer patients},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-021-09012-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265802},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: The majority of breast cancer patients are severely psychologically affected by breast cancer diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic procedures. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions on public life have additionally caused significant psychological distress for much of the population. It is therefore plausible that breast cancer patients might be particularly susceptible to the additional psychological stress caused by the pandemic, increasing suffering. In this study we therefore aimed to assess the level of psychological distress currently experienced by a defined group of breast cancer patients in our breast cancer centre, compared to distress levels preCOVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Female breast cancer patients of all ages receiving either adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or palliative therapies were recruited for the study. All patients were screened for current or previous COVID-19 infection. The participants completed a self-designed COVID-19 pandemic questionnaire, the Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (R) (NCCN (R)) Distress Thermometer (DT), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30, and the BR23. Results: Eighty-two breast cancer patients were included. Therapy status and social demographic factors did not have a significant effect on the distress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of the DT pre and during COVID-19 pandemic did not differ significantly. Using the self-designed COVID-19 pandemic questionnaire, we detected three distinct subgroups demonstrating different levels of concerns in relation to SARS-CoV-2. The subgroup with the highest levels of concern reported significantly decreased life quality, related parameters and symptoms. Conclusions: This monocentric study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected psychological health in a subpopulation of breast cancer patients. The application of a self-created "COVID-19 pandemic questionnaire"could potentially be used to help identify breast cancer patients who are susceptible to increased psychological distress due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and therefore may need additional intensive psychological support.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeierlePryssAizawa2023,
  author    = {Beierle, Felix and Pryss, R{\"u}diger and Aizawa, Akiko},
  title     = {Sentiments about mental health on Twitter — before and during the COVID-19 pandemic},
  series = {Healthcare},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Healthcare},
  number    = {21},
  issn      = {2227-9032},
  doi       = {10.3390/healthcare11212893},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-355192},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {During the COVID-19 pandemic, the novel coronavirus had an impact not only on public health but also on the mental health of the population. Public sentiment on mental health and depression is often captured only in small, survey-based studies, while work based on Twitter data often only looks at the period during the pandemic and does not make comparisons with the pre-pandemic situation. We collected tweets that included the hashtags \#MentalHealth and \#Depression from before and during the pandemic (8.5 months each). We used LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) for topic modeling and LIWC, VADER, and NRC for sentiment analysis. We used three machine-learning classifiers to seek evidence regarding an automatically detectable change in tweets before vs. during the pandemic: (1) based on TF-IDF values, (2) based on the values from the sentiment libraries, (3) based on tweet content (deep-learning BERT classifier). Topic modeling revealed that Twitter users who explicitly used the hashtags \#Depression and especially \#MentalHealth did so to raise awareness. We observed an overall positive sentiment, and in tough times such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, tweets with \#MentalHealth were often associated with gratitude. Among the three classification approaches, the BERT classifier showed the best performance, with an accuracy of 81\% for \#MentalHealth and 79\% for \#Depression. Although the data may have come from users familiar with mental health, these findings can help gauge public sentiment on the topic. The combination of (1) sentiment analysis, (2) topic modeling, and (3) tweet classification with machine learning proved useful in gaining comprehensive insight into public sentiment and could be applied to other data sources and topics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BertramBartschSodmannetal.2022,
  author    = {Bertram, Ralph and Bartsch, Vanessa and Sodmann, Johanna and Hennig, Luca and M{\"u}jde, Engin and Stock, Jonathan and Ruedig, Vivienne and Sodmann, Philipp and Todt, Daniel and Steinmann, Eike and Hitzl, Wolfgang and Steinmann, Joerg},
  title     = {Risk stratification of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections based on an outbreak at a student festive event},
  series = {Vaccines},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Vaccines},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2076-393X},
  doi       = {10.3390/vaccines10030432},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267270},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In early 2022, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a global challenge. COVID-19 is caused by an increasing number of variants of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here, we report an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections related to a student festive event with 100 mostly vaccinated guests, which took place in Northern Bavaria, Germany, in October 2021. The data were obtained by retrospective guest interviews. In total, 95 students participated in the study, with 94 being fully vaccinated and 24 reporting infection by the delta variant. Correlation analyses among 15 examined variables revealed that time spent at the event, conversation with the supposed index person, and a homologous viral vector vaccination regime were significant risk factors for infection. Non-significant observations related to higher rates of infection included time since last vaccination, shared use of drinking vessels, and number of individual person-to-person contacts at the event. Our data suggest that a high rate of breakthrough infections with the delta variant occurs if no preventive measures are practiced. To limit infection risk, high-quality testing of participants should be considered a mandatory measure at gatherings, irrespective of the participants' vaccination status.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BleilevensSoppertHoffmannetal.2021,
  author    = {Bleilevens, Christian and Soppert, Josefin and Hoffmann, Adrian and Breuer, Thomas and Bernhagen, J{\"u}rgen and Martin, Lukas and Stiehler, Lara and Marx, Gernot and Dreher, Michael and Stoppe, Christian and Simon, Tim-Philipp},
  title     = {Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) plasma concentration in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a prospective observational study},
  series = {Diagnostics},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Diagnostics},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2075-4418},
  doi       = {10.3390/diagnostics11020332},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228967},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Mortality in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is high and pharmacological treatment strategies remain limited. Early-stage predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients with a high risk of severe clinical courses and to stratify treatment strategies. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was previously described as a potential predictor for the outcome of critically ill patients and for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a hallmark of severe COVID-19 disease. This prospective observational study evaluates the predictive potential of MIF for the clinical outcome after severe COVID-19 infection. Plasma MIF concentrations were measured in 36 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients over three days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Increased compared to decreased MIF was significantly associated with aggravated organ function and a significantly lower 28-day survival (sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score; 8.2 ± 4.5 to 14.3 ± 3, p = 0.009 vs. 8.9 ± 1.9 to 12 ± 2, p = 0.296; survival: 56\% vs. 93\%; p = 0.003). Arterial hypertension was the predominant comorbidity in 85\% of patients with increasing MIF concentrations (vs. decreasing MIF: 39\%; p = 0.015). Without reaching significance, more patients with decreasing MIF were able to improve their ARDS status (p = 0.142). The identified association between an early MIF response, aggravation of organ function and 28-day survival may open future perspectives for biomarker-based diagnostic approaches for ICU management of COVID-19 patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuhlBeissertGaffaletal.2020,
  author    = {Buhl, Timo and Beissert, Stefan and Gaffal, Evelyn and Goebeler, Matthias and Hertl, Michael and Mauch, Cornelia and Reich, Kristian and Schmidt, Enno and Sch{\"o}n, Michael P. and Sticherling, Michael and Sunderk{\"o}tter, Cord and Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia and Werfel, Thomas and Wilsman-Theis, Dagmar and Worm, Margitta},
  title     = {COVID-19 and implications for dermatological and allergological diseases},
  series = {JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1111/ddg.14195},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-217860},
  pages     = {815 -- 824},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {COVID-19, caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has become pandemic. A further level of complexity opens up as soon as we look at diseases whose pathogenesis and therapy involve different immunological signaling pathways, which are potentially affected by COVID-19. Medical treatments must often be reassessed and questioned in connection with this infection. This article summarizes the current knowledge of COVID-19 in the light of major dermatological and allergological diseases. It identifies medical areas lacking sufficient data and draws conclusions for the management of our patients during the pandemic. We focus on common chronic inflammatory skin diseases with complex immunological pathogenesis: psoriasis, eczema including atopic dermatitis, type I allergies, autoimmune blistering and inflammatory connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, and skin cancers. Since several other inflammatory skin diseases display related or comparable immunological reactions, clustering of the various inflammatory dermatoses into different disease patterns may help with therapeutic decisions. Thus, following these patterns of skin inflammation, our review may supply treatment recommendations and thoughtful considerations for disease management even beyond the most frequent diseases discussed here.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DoelkenStichSpinner2021,
  author    = {D{\"o}lken, Lars and Stich, August and Spinner, Christoph D.},
  title     = {Remdesivir for Early COVID-19 Treatment of High-Risk Individuals Prior to or at Early Disease Onset — Lessons Learned},
  series = {Viruses},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Viruses},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {1999-4915},
  doi       = {10.3390/v13060963},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239648},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {After more than one year of the COVID-19 pandemic, antiviral treatment options against SARS-CoV-2 are still severely limited. High hopes that had initially been placed on antiviral drugs like remdesivir have so far not been fulfilled. While individual case reports provide striking evidence for the clinical efficacy of remdesivir in the right clinical settings, major trials failed to demonstrate this. Here, we highlight and discuss the key findings of these studies and underlying reasons for their failure. We elaborate on how such shortcomings should be prevented in future clinical trials and pandemics. We suggest in conclusion that any novel antiviral agent that enters human trials should first be tested in a post-exposure setting to provide rapid and solid evidence for its clinical efficacy before initiating further time-consuming and costly clinical trials for more advanced disease. In the COVID-19 pandemic this might have established remdesivir early on as an efficient antiviral agent at a more suitable disease stage which would have saved many lives, in particular in large outbreaks within residential care homes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FlemmingHankirErnestusetal.2020,
  author    = {Flemming, S. and Hankir, M. and Ernestus, R.-I. and Seyfried, F. and Germer, C.-T. and Meybohm, P. and Wurmb, T. and Vogel, U. and Wiegering, A.},
  title     = {Surgery in times of COVID-19 — recommendations for hospital and patient management},
  series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  volume    = {405},
  journal   = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  issn      = {1435-2443},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00423-020-01888-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231766},
  pages     = {359-364},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2), has escalated rapidly to a global pandemic stretching healthcare systems worldwide to their limits. Surgeonshave had to immediately react to this unprecedented clinical challenge by systematically repurposing surgical wards. Purpose To provide a detailed set of guidelines developed in a surgical ward at University Hospital Wuerzburg to safelyaccommodate the exponentially rising cases of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients without compromising the care of emergencysurgery and oncological patients or jeopardizing the well-being of hospital staff. Conclusions The dynamic prioritization of SARS-CoV-2 infected and surgical patient groups is key to preserving life whilemaintaining high surgical standards. Strictly segregating patient groups in emergency rooms, non-intensive care wards andoperating areas prevents viral spread while adequately training and carefully selecting hospital staff allow them to confidentlyand successfully undertake their respective clinical duties.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FlemmingHankirKusanetal.2021,
  author    = {Flemming, Sven and Hankir, Mohammed K. and Kusan, Simon and Krone, Manuel and Anger, Friedrich and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Safety of elective abdominal and vascular surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective single-center study},
  series = {European Journal of Medical Research},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {European Journal of Medical Research},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40001-021-00583-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264975},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who undergo surgery have impaired postoperative outcomes and increased mortality. Consequently, elective and semi-urgent operations on the increasing number of patients severely affected by COVID-19 have been indefinitely postponed.in many countries with unclear implications on disease progression and overall survival. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the establishment of a standardized screening program for acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is sufficient to ensure high-quality medical and surgical treatment of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients while minimizing in-hospital SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Methods The screening program comprised polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of nasopharyngeal swabs and a standardized questionnaire about potential symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 infection. All elective and emergency patients admitted to the surgical department of a tertiary-care hospital center in Lower Franconia, Germany, between March and May 2020 were included and their characteristics were recorded. Results Out of the study population (n = 657), 509 patients (77.5\%) had at least one risk factor for a potentially severe course of COVID-19 and 164 patients (25\%) were active smokers. The average 7-day incidence in Lower Franconia was 24.0/100,000 during the observation period. Preoperative PCR testing revealed four asymptomatic positive patients out of the 657 tested patients. No postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission could be detected. Conclusion The implementation of a standardized preoperative screening program to both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients can ensure high-quality surgical care while minimizing infection risk for healthcare workers and potential in-hospital transmission.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GesslerLehmannBoeseletal.2021,
  author    = {Gessler, Florian and Lehmann, Felix and B{\"o}sel, Julian and Fuhrer, Hannah and Neugebauer, Hermann and Wartenberg, Katja E. and Wolf, Stefan and Bernstock, Joshua D. and Niesen, Wolf-Dirk and Schuss, Patrick},
  title     = {Triage and Allocation of Neurocritical Care Resources During the COVID 19 Pandemic - A National Survey},
  series = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  issn      = {1664-2295},
  doi       = {10.3389/fneur.2020.609227},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-221593},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective: In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the associated hospitalization of an overwhelming number of ventilator-dependent patients, medical and/or ethical patient triage paradigms have become essential. While guidelines on the allocation of scarce resources do exist, such work within the subdisciplines of intensive care (e.g., neurocritical care) remains limited. Methods: A 16-item questionnaire was developed that sought to explore/quantify the expert opinions of German neurointensivists with regard to triage decisions. The anonymous survey was conducted via a web-based platform and in total, 96 members of the Initiative of German Neurointensive Trial Engagement (IGNITE)-study group were contacted via e-mail. The IGNITE consortium consists of an interdisciplinary panel of specialists with expertise in neuro-critical care (i.e., anesthetists, neurologists and neurosurgeons). Results: Fifty members of the IGNITE consortium responded to the questionnaire; in total the respondents were in charge of more than 500 Neuro ICU beds throughout Germany. Common determinants reported which affected triage decisions included known patient wishes (98\%), the state of health before admission (96\%), SOFA-score (85\%) and patient age (69\%). Interestingly, other principles of allocation, such as a treatment of "youngest first" (61\%) and members of the healthcare sector (50\%) were also noted. While these were the most accepted parameters affecting the triage of patients, a "first-come, first-served" principle appeared to be more accepted than a lottery for the allocation of ICU beds which contradicts much of what has been reported within the literature. The respondents also felt that at least one neurointensivist should serve on any interdisciplinary triage team. Conclusions: The data gathered in the context of this survey reveal the estimation/perception of triage algorithms among neurointensive care specialists facing COVID-19. Further, it is apparent that German neurointensivists strongly feel that they should be involved in any triage decisions at an institutional level given the unique resources needed to treat patients within the Neuro ICU.},
  language  = {en}
}