@article{GilbertEdenMeffertetal.2018,
  author    = {Gilbert, F. and Eden, L. and Meffert, R. and Konietschke, F. and Lotz, J. and Bauer, L. and Staab, W.},
  title     = {Intra- and interobserver reliability of glenoid fracture classifications by Ideberg, Euler and AO},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  number    = {89},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-018-2016-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176482},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Representing 3\%-5\% of shoulder girdle injuries scapula fractures are rare. Furthermore, approximately 1\% of scapula fractures are intraarticularfractures of the glenoid fossa. Because of uncertain fracture morphology and limited experience, the treatment of glenoid fossa fractures is difficult. The glenoid fracture classification by Ideberg (1984) and Euler (1996) is still commonly used in literature. In 2013 a new glenoid fracture classification was introduced by the AO. The purpose of this study was to examine the new AO classification in clinical practice in comparison with the classifications by Ideberg and Euler. Methods: In total CT images of 84 patients with glenoid fossa fractures from 2005 to 2018 were included. Parasagittal, paracoronary and axial reconstructions were examined according to the classifications of Ideberg, Euler and the AO by 3 investigators (orthopedic surgeon, radiologist, student of medicine) at three individual time settings. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the three classification systems were ascertained by computing Inter- and Intraclass (ICCs) correlation coefficients using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, 95\%-confidence intervals as well as F-tests for correlation coefficients. Results: Inter- and intraobserver reliability for the AO classification showed a perspicuous coherence (R = 0.74 and R = 0.79). Low to moderate intraobserver reliability for Ideberg (R = 0.46) and Euler classification (R = 0.41) was found. Furthermore, data show a low Interobserver reliability for both Ideberg and Euler classification (R < 0.2). Both the Inter- and Intraclass reliability using AO is significantly higher than those using Ideberg and Euler (p < 0.05). Using the new AO classification, it was possible to find a proper class for every glenoid fossa fracture. On average, according to Euler classification 10 of 84 fractures were not classifiable whereas to Ideberg classification 21 of 84 fractures were not classifiable. Conclusion: The new AO classification system introduced 2013 facilitates reliable grading of glenoid fossa fractures with high inter- and intraobserver reliability in 84 patients using CT images. It should possibly be applied in order to enable a valid, reliable and consistent academic description of glenoid fossa fractures. The established classifications by Euler and Ideberg are not capable of providing a similar reliability.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HuflageFieberFaerberetal.2022,
  author    = {Huflage, Henner and Fieber, Tabea and F{\"a}rber, Christian and Knarr, Jonas and Veldhoen, Simon and Jordan, Martin C. and Gilbert, Fabian and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Meffert, Rainer H. and Grunz, Jan-Peter and Schmalzl, Jonas},
  title     = {Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-022-05146-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299795},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Morphology and glenoid involvement determine the necessity of surgical management in scapula fractures. While being present in only a small share of patients with shoulder trauma, numerous classification systems have been in use over the years for categorization of scapula fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the established AO/OTA classification in comparison to the classification system of Euler and R{\"u}edi (ER) with regard to interobserver reliability and confidence in clinical practice. Methods Based on CT imaging, 149 patients with scapula fractures were retrospectively categorized by two trauma surgeons and two radiologists using the classification systems of ER and AO/OTA. To measure the interrater reliability, Fleiss kappa (κ) was calculated independently for both fracture classifications. Rater confidence was stated subjectively on a five-point scale and compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Additionally, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on absolute agreement in a two-way random effects model to assess the diagnostic confidence agreement between observers. Results In scapula fractures involving the glenoid fossa, interrater reliability was substantial (κ = 0.722; 95\% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-0.769) for the AO/OTA classification in contrast to moderate agreement (κ = 0.579; 95\% CI 0.525-0.634) for the ER classification system. Diagnostic confidence for intra-articular fracture patterns was superior using the AO/OTA classification compared to ER (p < 0.001) with higher confidence agreement (ICC: 0.882 versus 0.831). For extra-articular fractures, ER (κ = 0.817; 95\% CI 0.771-0.863) provided better interrater reliability compared to AO/OTA (κ = 0.734; 95\% CI 0.692-0.776) with higher diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) and superior agreement between confidence ratings (ICC: 0.881 versus 0.912). Conclusions The AO/OTA classification is most suitable to categorize intra-articular scapula fractures with glenoid involvement, whereas the classification system of Euler and R{\"u}edi appears to be superior in extra-articular injury patterns with fractures involving only the scapula body, spine, acromion and coracoid process.},
  language  = {en}
}