@article{BoulosSaeedChatterjeeetal.2021,
  author    = {Boulos, Joelle C. and Saeed, Mohamed E. M. and Chatterjee, Manik and B{\"u}lb{\"u}l, Yagmur and Crudo, Francesco and Marko, Doris and Munder, Markus and Klauck, Sabine M. and Efferth, Thomas},
  title     = {Repurposing of the ALK inhibitor crizotinib for acute leukemia and multiple myeloma cells},
  series = {Pharmaceuticals},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Pharmaceuticals},
  number    = {11},
  issn      = {1424-8247},
  doi       = {10.3390/ph14111126},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250258},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Crizotinib was a first generation of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. COMPARE and cluster analyses of transcriptomic data of the NCI cell line panel indicated that genes with different cellular functions regulated the sensitivity or resistance of cancer cells to crizotinib. Transcription factor binding motif analyses in gene promoters divulged two transcription factors possibly regulating the expression of these genes, i.e., RXRA and GATA1, which are important for leukemia and erythroid development, respectively. COMPARE analyses also implied that cell lines of various cancer types displayed varying degrees of sensitivity to crizotinib. Unexpectedly, leukemia but not lung cancer cells were the most sensitive cells among the different types of NCI cancer cell lines. Re-examining this result in another panel of cell lines indeed revealed that crizotinib exhibited potent cytotoxicity towards acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma cells. P-glycoprotein-overexpressing CEM/ADR5000 leukemia cells were cross-resistant to crizotinib. NCI-H929 multiple myeloma cells were the most sensitive cells. Hence, we evaluated the mode of action of crizotinib on these cells. Although crizotinib is a TKI, it showed highest correlation rates with DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors and tubulin inhibitors. The altered gene expression profiles after crizotinib treatment predicted several networks, where TOP2A and genes related to cell cycle were downregulated. Cell cycle analyses showed that cells incubated with crizotinib for 24 h accumulated in the G\(_2\)M phase. Crizotinib also increased the number of p-H3(Ser10)-positive NCI-H929 cells illustrating crizotinib's ability to prevent mitotic exit. However, cells accumulated in the sub-G\(_0\)G\(_1\) fraction with longer incubation periods, indicating apoptosis induction. Additionally, crizotinib disassembled the tubulin network of U2OS cells expressing an α-tubulin-GFP fusion protein, preventing migration of cancer cells. This result was verified by in vitro tubulin polymerization assays. In silico molecular docking also revealed a strong binding affinity of crizotinib to the colchicine and Vinca alkaloid binding sites. Taken together, these results demonstrate that crizotinib destabilized microtubules. Additionally, the decatenation assay showed that crizotinib partwise inhibited the catalytic activity of DNA topoisomerase II. In conclusion, crizotinib exerted kinase-independent cytotoxic effects through the dual inhibition of tubulin polymerization and topoisomerase II and might be used to treat not only NSCLC but also multiple myeloma.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GratwohlPfirrmannZanderetal.2016,
  author    = {Gratwohl, A and Pfirrmann, M and Zander, A and Kr{\"o}ger, N and Beelen, D and Novotny, J and Nerl, C and Scheid, C and Spiekermann, K and Mayer, J and Sayer, HG and Falge, C and Bunjes, D and D{\"o}hner, H and Ganser, A and Schmidt-Wolf, I and Schwerdtfeger, R and Baurmann, H and Kuse, R and Schmitz, N and Wehmeier, A and Fischer, J Th and Ho, AD and Wilhelm, M and Goebeler, M-E and Lindemann, HW and Bormann, M and Hertenstein, B and Schlimok, G and Baerlocher, GM and Aul, C and Pfreundschuh, M and Fabian, M and Staib, P and Edinger, M and Schatz, M and Fauser, A and Arnold, R and Kindler, T and Wulf, G and Rosselet, A and Hellmann, A and Sch{\"a}fer, E and Pr{\"u}mmer, O and Schenk, M and Hasford, J and Heimpel, H and Hossfeld, DK and Kolb, H-J and B{\"u}sche, G and Haferlach, C and Schnittger, S and M{\"u}ller, MC and Reiter, A and Berger, U and Saußele, S and Hochhaus, A and Hehlmann, R},
  title     = {Long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized comparison of stem cell transplantation with drug treatment},
  series = {Leukemia},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Leukemia},
  doi       = {10.1038/leu.2015.281},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150368},
  pages     = {562-569},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent today's treatment of choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is regarded as salvage therapy. This prospective randomized CML-study IIIA recruited 669 patients with newly diagnosed CML between July 1997 and January 2004 from 143 centers. Of these, 427 patients were considered eligible for HSCT and were randomized by availability of a matched family donor between primary HSCT (group A; N=166 patients) and best available drug treatment (group B; N=261). Primary end point was long-term survival. Survival probabilities were not different between groups A and B (10-year survival: 0.76 (95\% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.82) vs 0.69 (95\% CI: 0.61-0.76)), but influenced by disease and transplant risk. Patients with a low transplant risk showed superior survival compared with patients with high- (P<0.001) and non-high-risk disease (P=0.047) in group B; after entering blast crisis, survival was not different with or without HSCT. Significantly more patients in group A were in molecular remission (56\% vs 39\%; P = 0.005) and free of drug treatment (56\% vs 6\%; P<0.001). Differences in symptoms and Karnofsky score were not significant. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSCT remains a valid option when both disease and transplant risk are considered.},
  language  = {en}
}