@article{WeberLassalleHaukeRamseretal.2018,
  author    = {Weber-Lassalle, Nana and Hauke, Jan and Ramser, Juliane and Richters, Lisa and Groß, Eva and Bl{\"u}mcke, Britta and Gehrig, Andrea and Kahlert, Anne-Karin and M{\"u}ller, Clemens R. and Hackmann, Karl and Honisch, Ellen and Weber-Lassalle, Konstantin and Niederacher, Dieter and Borde, Julika and Thiele, Holger and Ernst, Corinna and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and Neidhardt, Guido and N{\"u}rnberg, Peter and Klaschik, Kristina and Schroeder, Christopher and Platzer, Konrad and Volk, Alexander E. and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Just, Walter and Auber, Bernd and Kubisch, Christian and Schmidt, Gunnar and Horvath, Judit and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Engel, Christoph and Arnold, Norbert and Dworniczak, Bernd and Rhiem, Kerstin and Meindl, Alfons and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Hahnen, Eric},
  title     = {BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13058-018-0935-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233433},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Germline mutations in the BRIP1 gene have been described as conferring a moderate risk for ovarian cancer (OC), while the role of BRIP1 in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis remains controversial. Methods To assess the role of deleterious BRIP1 germline mutations in BC/OC predisposition, 6341 well-characterized index patients with BC, 706 index patients with OC, and 2189 geographically matched female controls were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging missense variants. All index patients met the inclusion criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for germline testing and tested negative for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Results BRIP1 LoF mutations confer a high OC risk in familial index patients (odds ratio (OR) = 20.97, 95\% confidence interval (CI) = 12.02-36.57, P < 0.0001) and in the subgroup of index patients with late-onset OC (OR = 29.91, 95\% CI = 14.99-59.66, P < 0.0001). No significant association of BRIP1 LoF mutations with familial BC was observed (OR = 1.81 95\% CI = 1.00-3.30, P = 0.0623). In the subgroup of familial BC index patients without a family history of OC there was also no apparent association (OR = 1.42, 95\% CI = 0.70-2.90, P = 0.3030). In 1027 familial BC index patients with a family history of OC, the BRIP1 mutation prevalence was significantly higher than that observed in controls (OR = 3.59, 95\% CI = 1.43-9.01; P = 0.0168). Based on the negative association between BRIP1 LoF mutations and familial BC in the absence of an OC family history, we conclude that the elevated mutation prevalence in the latter cohort was driven by the occurrence of OC in these families. Compared with controls, predicted damaging rare missense variants were significantly more prevalent in OC (P = 0.0014) but not in BC (P = 0.0693) patients. Conclusions To avoid ambiguous results, studies aimed at assessing the impact of candidate predisposition gene mutations on BC risk might differentiate between BC index patients with an OC family history and those without. In familial cases, we suggest that BRIP1 is a high-risk gene for late-onset OC but not a BC predisposition gene, though minor effects cannot be excluded.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{VigoritoKuchenbaeckerBeesleyetal.2016,
  author    = {Vigorito, Elena and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B. and Beesley, Jonathan and Adlard, Julian and Agnarsson, Bjarni A. and Andrulis, Irene L. and Arun, Banu K. and Barjhoux, Laure and Belotti, Muriel and Benitez, Javier and Berger, Andreas and Bojesen, Anders and Bonanni, Bernardo and Brewer, Carole and Caldes, Trinidad and Caligo, Maria A. and Campbell, Ian and Chan, Salina B. and Claes, Kathleen B. M. and Cohn, David E. and Cook, Jackie and Daly, Mary B. and Damiola, Francesca and Davidson, Rosemarie and de Pauw, Antoine and Delnatte, Capucine and Diez, Orland and Domchek, Susan M. and Dumont, Martine and Durda, Katarzyna and Dworniczak, Bernd and Easton, Douglas F. and Eccles, Diana and Ardnor, Christina Edwinsdotter and Eeles, Ros and Ejlertsen, Bent and Ellis, Steve and Evans, D. Gareth and Feliubadalo, Lidia and Fostira, Florentia and Foulkes, William D. and Friedman, Eitan and Frost, Debra and Gaddam, Pragna and Ganz, Patricia A. and Garber, Judy and Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa and Gauthier-Villars, Marion and Gehrig, Andrea and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Giraud, Sophie and Godwin, Andrew K. and Goldgar, David E. and Hake, Christopher R. and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and Healey, Sue and Hodgson, Shirley and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Houdayer, Claude and Hulick, Peter J. and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Isaacs, Claudine and Izatt, Louise and Izquierdo, Angel and Jacobs, Lauren and Jakubowska, Anna and Janavicius, Ramunas and Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna and Jensen, Uffe Birk and John, Esther M. and Vijai, Joseph and Karlan, Beth Y. and Kast, Karin and Khan, Sofia and Kwong, Ava and Laitman, Yael and Lester, Jenny and Lesueur, Fabienne and Liljegren, Annelie and Lubinski, Jan and Mai, Phuong L. and Manoukian, Siranoush and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Meindl, Alfons and Mensenkamp, Arjen R. and Montagna, Marco and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Niederacher, Dieter and Olah, Edith and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Ong, Kai-ren and Osorio, Ana and Park, Sue Kyung and Paulsson-Karlsson, Ylva and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Peissel, Bernard and Peterlongo, Paolo and Pfeiler, Georg and Phelan, Catherine M. and Piedmonte, Marion and Poppe, Bruce and Pujana, Miquel Angel and Radice, Paolo and Rennert, Gad and Rodriguez, Gustavo C. and Rookus, Matti A. and Ross, Eric A. and Schmutzler, Rita Katharina and Simard, Jacques and Singer, Christian F. and Slavin, Thomas P. and Soucy, Penny and Southey, Melissa and Steinemann, Doris and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Sukiennicki, Grzegorz and Sutter, Christian and Szabo, Csilla I. and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Teo, Soo-Hwang and Terry, Mary Beth and Thomassen, Mads and Tibiletti, Maria Grazia and Tihomirova, Laima and Tognazzo, Silvia and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Varesco, Liliana and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Vratimos, Athanassios and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and McGuffog, Lesley and Kirk, Judy and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Hamann, Ute and Lindor, Noralane and Ramus, Susan J. and Greene, Mark H. and Couch, Fergus J. and Offit, Kenneth and Pharoah, Paul D. P. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C.},
  title     = {Fine-Scale Mapping at 9p22.2 Identifies Candidate Causal Variants That Modify Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0158801},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166869},
  pages     = {e0158801},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Population-based genome wide association studies have identified a locus at 9p22.2 associated with ovarian cancer risk, which also modifies ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. We conducted fine-scale mapping at 9p22.2 to identify potential causal variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Genotype data were available for 15,252 (2,462 ovarian cancer cases) BRCA1 and 8,211 (631 ovarian cancer cases) BRCA2 mutation carriers. Following genotype imputation, ovarian cancer associations were assessed for 4,873 and 5,020 SNPs in BRCA1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers respectively, within a retrospective cohort analytical framework. In BRCA1 mutation carriers one set of eight correlated candidate causal variants for ovarian cancer risk modification was identified (top SNP rs10124837, HR: 0.73, 95\%CI: 0.68 to 0.79, p-value 2× 10-16). These variants were located up to 20 kb upstream of BNC2. In BRCA2 mutation carriers one region, up to 45 kb upstream of BNC2, and containing 100 correlated SNPs was identified as candidate causal (top SNP rs62543585, HR: 0.69, 95\%CI: 0.59 to 0.80, p-value 1.0 × 10-6). The candidate causal in BRCA1 mutation carriers did not include the strongest associated variant at this locus in the general population. In sum, we identified a set of candidate causal variants in a region that encompasses the BNC2 transcription start site. The ovarian cancer association at 9p22.2 may be mediated by different variants in BRCA1 mutation carriers and in the general population. Thus, potentially different mechanisms may underlie ovarian cancer risk for mutation carriers and the general population.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SilvestriBarrowdaleMulliganetal.2016,
  author    = {Silvestri, Valentina and Barrowdale, Daniel and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Fox, Stephen and Karlan, Beth Y. and Mitchell, Gillian and James, Paul and Thull, Darcy L. and Zorn, Kristin K. and Carter, Natalie J. and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Domchek, Susan M. and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Ramus, Susan J. and Nussbaum, Robert L. and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Rantala, Johanna and Yoon, Sook-Yee and Caligo, Maria A. and Spugnesi, Laura and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Thomassen, Mads and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Senter, Leigha and Andrulis, Irene L. and Glendon, Gord and Hulick, Peter J. and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Singer, Christian F. and Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Christine and Kramer, Gero and Vijai, Joseph and Offit, Kenneth and Robson, Mark and Lincoln, Anne and Jacobs, Lauren and Machackova, Eva and Foretova, Lenka and Navratilova, Marie and Vasickova, Petra and Couch, Fergus J. and Hallberg, Emily and Ruddy, Kathryn J. and Sharma, Priyanka and Kim, Sung-Won and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Pinto, Pedro and Montagna, Marco and Matricardi, Laura and Arason, Adalgeir and Johannsson, Oskar Th and Barkardottir, Rosa B. and Jakubowska, Anna and Lubinski, Jan and Izquierdo, Angel and Pujana, Miguel Angel and Balma{\~n}a, Judith and Diez, Orland and Ivady, Gabriella and Papp, Janos and Olah, Edith and Kwong, Ava and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Segura, Pedro Perez and Caldes, Trinidad and Van Maerken, Tom and Poppe, Bruce and Claes, Kathleen B. M. and Isaacs, Claudine and Elan, Camille and Lasset, Christine and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Barjhoux, Laure and Belotti, Muriel and Meindl, Alfons and Gehrig, Andrea and Sutter, Christian and Engel, Christoph and Niederacher, Dieter and Steinemann, Doris and Hahnen, Eric and Kast, Karin and Arnold, Norbert and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Wand, Dorothea and Godwin, Andrew K. and Evans, D. Gareth and Frost, Debra and Perkins, Jo and Adlard, Julian and Izatt, Louise and Platte, Radka and Eeles, Ros and Ellis, Steve and Hamann, Ute and Garber, Judy and Fostira, Florentia and Fountzilas, George and Pasini, Barbara and Giannini, Giuseppe and Rizzolo, Piera and Russo, Antonio and Cortesi, Laura and Papi, Laura and Varesco, Liliana and Palli, Domenico and Zanna, Ines and Savarese, Antonella and Radice, Paolo and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Barile, Monica and Bonanni, Bernardo and Viel, Alessandra and Pensotti, Valeria and Tommasi, Stefania and Peterlongo, Paolo and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Osorio, Ana and Benitez, Javier and McGuffog, Lesley and Healey, Sue and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Ejlertsen, Bent and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and Steele, Linda and Ding, Yuan Chun and Tung, Nadine and Janavicius, Ramunas and Goldgar, David E. and Buys, Saundra S. and Daly, Mary B. and Bane, Anita and Terry, Mary Beth and John, Esther M. and Southey, Melissa and Easton, Douglas F. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Ottini, Laura},
  title     = {Male breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: pathology data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research},
  number    = {15},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13058-016-0671-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164769},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background BRCA1 and, more commonly, BRCA2 mutations are associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (MBC). However, only a paucity of data exists on the pathology of breast cancers (BCs) in men with BRCA1/2 mutations. Using the largest available dataset, we determined whether MBCs arising in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers display specific pathologic features and whether these features differ from those of BRCA1/2 female BCs (FBCs). Methods We characterised the pathologic features of 419 BRCA1/2 MBCs and, using logistic regression analysis, contrasted those with data from 9675 BRCA1/2 FBCs and with population-based data from 6351 MBCs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results Among BRCA2 MBCs, grade significantly decreased with increasing age at diagnosis (P = 0.005). Compared with BRCA2 FBCs, BRCA2 MBCs were of significantly higher stage (P for trend = 2 × 10-5) and higher grade (P for trend = 0.005) and were more likely to be oestrogen receptor-positive [odds ratio (OR) 10.59; 95 \% confidence interval (CI) 5.15-21.80] and progesterone receptor-positive (OR 5.04; 95 \% CI 3.17-8.04). With the exception of grade, similar patterns of associations emerged when we compared BRCA1 MBCs and FBCs. BRCA2 MBCs also presented with higher grade than MBCs from the SEER database (P for trend = 4 × 10-12). Conclusions On the basis of the largest series analysed to date, our results show that BRCA1/2 MBCs display distinct pathologic characteristics compared with BRCA1/2 FBCs, and we identified a specific BRCA2-associated MBC phenotype characterised by a variable suggesting greater biological aggressiveness (i.e., high histologic grade). These findings could lead to the development of gender-specific risk prediction models and guide clinical strategies appropriate for MBC management.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SepahiFaustSturmetal.2019,
  author    = {Sepahi, Ilnaz and Faust, Ulrike and Sturm, Marc and Bosse, Kristin and Kehrer, Martin and Heinrich, Tilman and Grundman-Hauser, Kathrin and Bauer, Peter and Ossowski, Stephan and Susak, Hana and Varon, Raymonda and Schr{\"o}ck, Evelin and Niederacher, Dieter and Auber, Bernd and Sutter, Christian and Arnold, Norbert and Hahnen, Eric and Dworniczak, Bernd and Wang-Gorke, Shan and Gehrig, Andrea and Weber, Bernhard H. F. and Engel, Christoph and Lemke, Johannes R. and Hartkopf, Andreas and Huu Phuc, Nguyen and Riess, Olaf and Schroeder, Christopher},
  title     = {Investigating the effects of additional truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on breast cancer risk in BRCA1-positive women},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-019-5946-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237676},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Inherited pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most common causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The risk of developing breast cancer by age 80 in women carrying a BRCA1 pathogenic variant is 72\%. The lifetime risk varies between families and even within affected individuals of the same family. The cause of this variability is largely unknown, but it is hypothesized that additional genetic factors contribute to differences in age at onset (AAO). Here we investigated whether truncating and rare missense variants in genes of different DNA-repair pathways contribute to this phenomenon. Methods We used extreme phenotype sampling to recruit 133 BRCA1-positive patients with either early breast cancer onset, below 35 (early AAO cohort) or cancer-free by age 60 (controls). Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was used to screen for variants in 311 genes involved in different DNA-repair pathways. Results Patients with an early AAO (73 women) had developed breast cancer at a median age of 27 years (interquartile range (IQR); 25.00-27.00 years). A total of 3703 variants were detected in all patients and 43 of those (1.2\%) were truncating variants. The truncating variants were found in 26 women of the early AAO group (35.6\%; 95\%-CI 24.7 - 47.7\%) compared to 16 women of controls (26.7\%; 95\%-CI 16.1 to 39.7\%). When adjusted for environmental factors and family history, the odds ratio indicated an increased breast cancer risk for those carrying an additional truncating DNA-repair variant to BRCA1 mutation (OR: 3.1; 95\%-CI 0.92 to 11.5; p-value = 0.07), although it did not reach the conventionally acceptable significance level of 0.05. Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first time that the combined effect of truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on AAO in patients with hereditary breast cancer is investigated. Our results indicate that co-occurring truncating variants might be associated with an earlier onset of breast cancer in BRCA1-positive patients. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RolfesBordeMoellenhoffetal.2022,
  author    = {Rolfes, Muriel and Borde, Julika and M{\"o}llenhoff, Kathrin and Kayali, Mohamad and Ernst, Corinna and Gehrig, Andrea and Sutter, Christian and Ramser, Juliane and Niederacher, Dieter and Horv{\´a}th, Judit and Arnold, Norbert and Meindl, Alfons and Auber, Bernd and Rump, Andreas and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Ritter, Julia and Hentschel, Julia and Thiele, Holger and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and N{\"u}rnberg, Peter and Rhiem, Kerstin and Engel, Christoph and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Hahnen, Eric and Hauke, Jan},
  title     = {Prevalence of cancer predisposition germline variants in male breast cancer patients: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {13},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14133292},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281758},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Male breast cancer (mBC) is associated with a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA2 gene; however, data regarding other BC predisposition genes are limited. In this retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the prevalence of PVs in BRCA1/2 and 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes using a sample of 614 patients with mBC, recruited through the centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. A high proportion of patients with mBC carried PVs in BRCA2 (23.0\%, 142/614) and BRCA1 (4.6\%, 28/614). The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 11.0\% in patients with mBC without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs did not show an earlier disease onset than those without. The predominant clinical presentation of tumor phenotypes was estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, and HER2-negative (77.7\%); further, 10.2\% of the tumors were triple-positive, and 1.2\% were triple-negative. No association was found between ER/PR/HER2 status and BRCA1/2 PV occurrence. Comparing the prevalence of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) between patients with mBC and control data (ExAC, n = 27,173) revealed significant associations of PTVs in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 with mBC (BRCA1: OR = 17.04, 95\% CI = 10.54-26.82, p < 10\(^{-5}\); BRCA2: OR = 77.71, 95\% CI = 58.71-102.33, p < 10\(^{-5}\)). A case-control investigation of 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes in 340 BRCA1/2-negative patients and ExAC controls revealed significant associations of PTVs in CHEK2, PALB2, and ATM with mBC (CHEK2: OR = 3.78, 95\% CI = 1.59-7.71, p = 0.002; PALB2: OR = 14.77, 95\% CI = 5.02-36.02, p < 10\(^{-5}\); ATM: OR = 3.36, 95\% CI = 0.89-8.96, p = 0.04). Overall, our findings support the benefit of multi-gene panel testing in patients with mBC irrespective of their family history, age at disease onset, and tumor phenotype.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OsorioMilneKuchenbaeckeretal.2014,
  author    = {Osorio, Ana and Milne, Roger L. and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline and Vaclov{\´a}, Tereza and Pita, Guillermo and Alonso, Rosario and Peterlongo, Paolo and Blanco, Ignacio and de la Hoya, Miguel and Duran, Mercedes and Diez, Orland and Ram{\´o}n y Cajal, Teresa and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Mart{\´i}nez-Bouzas, Christina and Conejero, Raquel Andr{\´e}s and Soucy, Penny and McGuffog, Lesley and Barrowdale, Daniel and Lee, Andrew and Arver, Brita and Rantala, Johanna and Loman, Niklas and Ehrencrona, Hans and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Beattie, Mary S. and Domchek, Susan M. and Nathanson, Katherine and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Arun, Banu K. and Karlan, Beth Y. and Walsh, Christine and Lester, Jenny and John, Esther M. and Whittemore, Alice S. and Daly, Mary B. and Southey, Melissa and Hopper, John and Terry, Mary B. and Buys, Saundra S. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Dorfling, Cecilia M. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Steele, Linda and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan Chun and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and J{\o}nson, Lars and Ejlertsen, Bent and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Infante, Mar and Herr{\´a}ez, Bel{\´e}n and Moreno, Leticia Thais and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Herzog, Josef and Weeman, Kisa and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Scuvera, Guilietta and Bonanni, Bernardo and Mariette, Frederique and Volorio, Sara and Viel, Alessandra and Varesco, Liliana and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Tibiletti, Maria Grazia and Radice, Paolo and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Garber, Judy and Ellis, Steve and Frost, Debra and Platte, Radka and Fineberg, Elena and Evans, Gareth and Lalloo, Fiona and Izatt, Louise and Eeles, Ros and Adlard, Julian and Davidson, Rosemarie and Cole, Trevor and Eccles, Diana and Cook, Jackie and Hodgson, Shirley and Brewer, Carole and Tischkowitz, Marc and Douglas, Fiona and Porteous, Mary and Side, Lucy and Walker, Lisa and Morrison, Patrick and Donaldson, Alan and Kennedy, John and Foo, Claire and Godwin, Andrew K. and Schmutzler, Rita Katharina and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Rhiem, Kerstin and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alftons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Plendl, Hans J{\"o}rg and Niederacher, Dieter and Sutter, Christian and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Steinemann, Doris and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Kast, Karin and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Gehrig, Andrea and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Damiola, Francesca and Poppe, Bruce and Claes, Kathleen and Piedmonte, Marion and Tucker, Kathy and Backes, Floor and Rodr{\´i}guez, Gustavo and Brewster, Wendy and Wakeley, Katie and Rutherford, Thomas and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Rookus, Matti A. and van Os, Theo A. M. and van der Kolk, Lizet and de Lange, J. L. and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and van der Hout, A. H. and van Asperen, Christi J. and Gom{\´e}z Garcia, Encarna B. and Encarna, B. and Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline and Coll{\´e}e, J. Margriet and van Deurzen, Carolien H. M. and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Devilee, Peter and Olah, Edith and L{\´a}zaro, Conxi and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Men{\´e}ndez, Mireia and Jakubowska, Anna and Cybulski, Cezary and Gronwald, Jecek and Lubinski, Jan and Durda, Katarzyna and Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna and Johannsson, Oskar Th. and Maugard, Christine and Montagna, Marco and Tognazzo, Silvia and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Healey, Sue and Olswold, Curtis and Guidugli, Lucia and Lindor, Noralane and Slager, Susan and Szabo, Csilla I. and Vijai, Joseph and Robson, Mark and Kauff, Noah and Zhang, Liying and Rau-Murthy, Rohini and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Singer, Christine F. and Rappaport, Christine and Kaulich, Daphne Geschwantler and Pfeiler, Georg and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Berger, Andreas and Phelan, Catherine M. and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Lejbkowicz, Flavio and Andrulis, Irene and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Sunde, Lone and Thomassen, Mads and Kruse, Torben A. and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Friedman, Eitan and Laitman, Yeal and Shimon, Shanie Paluch and Simard, Jaques and Easton, Douglas F. and Offit, Kenneth and Couch, Fergus J. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Benitez, Javier},
  title     = {DNA Glycosylases Involved in Base Excision Repair May Be Associated with Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers},
  series = {PLOS Genetics},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {PLOS Genetics},
  number    = {e1004256},
  issn      = {1553-7404},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116820},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway could be associated with cancer risk in carriers of mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the BER pathway, PARP1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase), and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of 18 genes involved in BER using a tagging SNP approach in a large series of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. 144 SNPs were analyzed in a two stage study involving 23,463 carriers from the CIMBA consortium (the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). Eleven SNPs showed evidence of association with breast and/or ovarian cancer at p<0.05 in the combined analysis. Four of the five genes for which strongest evidence of association was observed were DNA glycosylases. The strongest evidence was for rs1466785 in the NEIL2 (endonuclease VIII-like 2) gene (HR: 1.09, 95\% CI (1.03-1.16), p = 2.7x10(-3)) for association with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and rs2304277 in the OGG1 (8-guanine DNA glycosylase) gene, with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR: 1.12 95\% CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 4.8x10(-3)). DNA glycosylases involved in the first steps of the BER pathway may be associated with cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and should be more comprehensively studied.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HansmannPliushchLeubneretal.2012,
  author    = {Hansmann, Tamara and Pliushch, Galyna and Leubner, Monika and Kroll, Patricia and Endt, Daniela and Gehrig, Andrea and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Wieacker, Peter and Haaf, Thomas},
  title     = {Constitutive promoter methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C in patients with familial ovarian cancer and early-onset sporadic breast cancer},
  series = {Human Molecular Genetics},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Human Molecular Genetics},
  number    = {21},
  doi       = {10.1093/hmg/dds308},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-125673},
  pages     = {4669-4679},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Genetic defects in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes, most importantly BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for ∼40\% of hereditary BC and ovarian cancer (OC). Little is known about the contribution of constitutive (soma-wide) epimutations to the remaining cases. We developed bisulfite pyrosequencing assays to screen >600 affected BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation-negative patients from the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for constitutive hypermethylation of ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, PTEN and TP53 in blood cells. In a second step, patients with ≥6\% promoter methylation were analyzed by bisulfite plasmid sequencing to demonstrate the presence of hypermethylated alleles (epimutations), indicative of epigenetic gene silencing. Altogether we identified nine (1.4\%) patients with constitutive BRCA1 and three (0.5\%) with RAD51C hypermethylation. Epimutations were found in both sporadic cases, in particular in 2 (5.5\%) of 37 patients with early-onset BC, and familial cases, in particular 4 (10\%) of 39 patients with OC. Hypermethylation was always confined to one of the two parental alleles in a subset (12-40\%) of the analyzed cells. Because epimutations occurred in cell types from different embryonal layers, they most likely originated in single cells during early somatic development. We propose that analogous to germline genetic mutations constitutive epimutations may serve as the first hit of tumor development. Because the role of constitutive epimutations in cancer development is likely to be largely underestimated, future strategies for effective testing of susceptibility to BC and OC should include an epimutation screen.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Gehrig2003,
  author    = {Gehrig, Andrea},
  title     = {Untersuchungen zu den molekularen Ursachen der X-gebundenen juvenilen Retinoschisis - vom Gendefekt zum Mausmodell},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-7212},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Heredit{\"a}re Netzhautdegenerationen betreffen weltweit etwa 15 Millionen Menschen. Sie sind klinisch und genetisch auff{\"a}llig heterogen. Bisher wurden 139 verschiedene chromosomale Genorte mit Netzhautdystrophien assoziiert, wovon inzwischen 90 Gene identifiziert werden konnten. Mit Hilfe verschiedener Klonierungsstrategien konnte in der vorgelegten Arbeit ein Beitrag zur Aufkl{\"a}rung der genetischen Ursachen einiger ausgew{\"a}hlter Retinopathien geleistet werden. So konnte durch die Positionsklonierung das Gen, das mit der X-gebundenen juvenilen Retinoschisis (RS) assoziiert ist, identifiziert werden. Funktionelle Analysen des Genproduktes sowie die Generierung eines Mausmodells der RS geben einen Einblick in die Physiologie der Retina sowie den Pathomechanismus der Erkrankung. Die genomische Organisation des Interphotorezeptor-Matrixproteoglykans-1 (IMPG1) wurde aufgekl{\"a}rt und die chromosomale Lokalisation auf 6q13-15 bestimmt. Damit kartierte das Gen in eine Region, in die die Genorte f{\"u}r 7 Retinopathien des Menschen kartiert wurden. Durch Kopplungs- und Mutationsanalysen konnten unsere Arbeiten ausschließen, daß IMPG1 mit North Carolina Makuladystrophie (MCDR1) oder der progressiven bifokalen chorioretinalen Atrophie (PBCRA) in Zusammenhang steht. Die Diacylglycerin Kinase-3 (DAGK3) konnte nach der Bestimmung der genomischen Organisation in die Region 3q27-28 kartiert werden. Dieser chromosomale Abschnitt deckt sich mit der chromosomalen Lokalisation der autosomal dominanten Optikusatrophie (OPA1). Auch hier konnte mit Hilfe von Mutationsanalysen ein Ausschluß des Gens erfolgen. Die X-gebundene juvenile Retinoschisis ist eine h{\"a}ufige Ursache juveniler Makula-degenerationen und betrifft etwa 300.000 junge M{\"a}nner weltweit. Charakteristische Kennzeichen der Erkrankung sind Aufspaltungen in den inneren Netzhautschichten, die zu zystischen Ver{\"a}nderungen der zentralen Retina f{\"u}hren. Ungef{\"a}hr 50 \% der Patienten entwickeln auch periphere Manifestationen. Durch die Arbeit unserer und anderer Forschergruppen konnte der Krankheitslokus in einen etwa 900 kb großen Bereich auf dem kurzen Arm des X-Chromosoms (Xp22.2) kartiert werden. Durch einen Vergleich der genomischen DNA Sequenzen mit {\"o}ffentlich zug{\"a}nglichen ESTs (expressed sequence tags) konnte ein retinaspezifisches Transkript identifiziert werden. Es besteht aus 6 Exonen und kodiert f{\"u}r ein putatives 224 Aminos{\"a}uren großes Protein, das sekretiert wird und ein hochkonserviertes Discoidindom{\"a}nen-Motiv enth{\"a}lt. Discoidindom{\"a}nen sind in Zelladh{\"a}sion oder in Zell-Zell Interaktionen involviert. Mutationsanalysen in RS-Patienten best{\"a}tigten, daß es sich bei diesem Transkript um RS1, d.h. um das krankheitsassoziierte Gen der X-gebundenen juvenilen Retinoschisis handelte. Das RS1-Protein (Retinoschisin) kommt in homo-oligomeren Komplexen, die {\"u}ber Disulfidbr{\"u}cken miteinander verbunden sind, auf der Zelloberfl{\"a}che der Photorezeptoren und der Bipolaren sowie in den synaptischen Regionen der {\"a}ußeren (OPL) und innere plexiformen Schicht (IPL) vor. Um die Funktion des normalen Retinoschisins zu untersuchen und um einen Einblick in die RS-Pathogenese zu bekommen, wurde nach der Charakterisierung des orthologen murinen Gens (Rs1h) eine Retinoschisin-defiziente knock-out Maus generiert. Ophthalmologische und histologische Untersuchungen der Rs1h-/Y-Maus zeigen signifikante Parallelen zu dem RS-Erkrankungsbild des Menschen. Damit stellt die Rs1h knock-out Maus ein ideales Tiermodell f{\"u}r die Untersuchung des zugrundeliegenden Krankheitsmechanismusses dar. So konnten wir inzwischen zeigen, daß apoptotische Prozesse zur Degeneration der Photorezeptoren f{\"u}hren. Gegenw{\"a}rtig werden mit diesem Tiermodell erste gentherapeutische Versuche durchgef{\"u}hrt. Diese Arbeiten sollen Aufschluß dar{\"u}ber geben, ob ein Adeno-assoziierter Virus (AAV)-Transfer des RS1 Gens in die erkrankte Retina ein m{\"o}glicher Therapieansatz f{\"u}r RS auch beim Menschen sein k{\"o}nnte.},
  subject      = {Maus},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EngelRhiemHahnenetal.2018,
  author    = {Engel, Christoph and Rhiem, Kerstin and Hahnen, Eric and Loibl, Sibylle and Weber, Karsten E. and Seiler, Sabine and Zachariae, Silke and Hauke, Jan and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Waha, Anke and Bl{\"u}mcke, Britta and Kiechle, Marion and Meindl, Alfons and Niederacher, Dieter and Bartram, Claus R. and Speiser, Dorothee and Schlegelberger, Brigitte and Arnold, Norbert and Wieacker, Peter and Leinert, Elena and Gehrig, Andrea and Briest, Susanne and Kast, Karin and Riess, Olaf and Emons, G{\"u}nter and Weber, Bernhard H. F. and Engel, Jutta and Schmutzler, Rita K.},
  title     = {Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations among 802 women with unilateral triple-negative breast cancer without family cancer history},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  organization    = {German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC)},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-018-4029-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226763},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background There is no international consensus up to which age women with a diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and no family history of breast or ovarian cancer should be offered genetic testing for germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA) mutations. Here, we explored the association of age at TNBC diagnosis with the prevalence of pathogenic gBRCA mutations in this patient group. Methods The study comprised 802 women (median age 40 years, range 19-76) with oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative breast cancers, who had no relatives with breast or ovarian cancer. All women were tested for pathogenic gBRCA mutations. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between age at TNBC diagnosis and the presence of a pathogenic gBRCA mutation. Results A total of 127 women with TNBC(15.8\%) were gBRCA mutation carriers (BRCA1: n = 118, 14.7\%; BRCA2: n = 9, 1. 1\%). The mutation prevalence was 32.9\% in the age group 20-29 years compared to 6.9\% in the age group 60-69 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant increase of mutation frequency with decreasing age at diagnosis (odds ratio 1.87 per 10 year decrease, 95\% CI 1.50-2.32, p < 0.001). gBRCA mutation risk was predicted to be > 10\% for women diagnosed below approximately 50 years. Conclusions Based on the general understanding that a heterozygous mutation probability of 10\% or greater justifies gBRCA mutation screening, women with TNBC diagnosed before the age of 50 years and no familial history of breast and ovarian cancer should be tested for gBRCA mutations. In Germany, this would concern approximately 880 women with newly diagnosed TNBC per year, of whom approximately 150 are expected to be identified as carriers of a pathogenic gBRCA mutation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DumontWeberLassalleJolyBeauparlantetal.2022,
  author    = {Dumont, Martine and Weber-Lassalle, Nana and Joly-Beauparlant, Charles and Ernst, Corinna and Droit, Arnaud and Feng, Bing-Jian and Dubois, St{\´e}phane and Collin-Deschesnes, Annie-Claude and Soucy, Penny and Vall{\´e}e, Maxime and Fournier, Fr{\´e}d{\´e}ric and Lema{\c{c}}on, Audrey and Adank, Muriel A. and Allen, Jamie and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and Arnold, Norbert and Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. and Berutti, Riccardo and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Bull, Shelley and Carvalho, Sara and Cornelissen, Sten and Dufault, Michael R. and Dunning, Alison M. and Engel, Christoph and Gehrig, Andrea and Geurts-Giele, Willemina R. R. and Gieger, Christian and Green, Jessica and Hackmann, Karl and Helmy, Mohamed and Hentschel, Julia and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hollestelle, Antoinette and Hooning, Maartje J. and Horv{\´a}th, Judit and Ikram, M. Arfan and Kaulfuß, Silke and Keeman, Renske and Kuang, Da and Luccarini, Craig and Maier, Wolfgang and Martens, John W. M. and Niederacher, Dieter and N{\"u}rnberg, Peter and Ott, Claus-Eric and Peters, Annette and Pharoah, Paul D. P. and Ramirez, Alfredo and Ramser, Juliane and Riedel-Heller, Steffi and Schmidt, Gunnar and Shah, Mitul and Scherer, Martin and St{\"a}bler, Antje and Strom, Tim M. and Sutter, Christian and Thiele, Holger and van Asperen, Christi J. and van der Kolk, Lizet and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Volk, Alexander E. and Wagner, Michael and Waisfisz, Quinten and Wang, Qin and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Weber, Bernhard H. F. and Devilee, Peter and Tavtigian, Sean and Bader, Gary D. and Meindl, Alfons and Goldgar, David E. and Andrulis, Irene L. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Easton, Douglas F. and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Hahnen, Eric and Simard, Jacques},
  title     = {Uncovering the contribution of moderate-penetrance susceptibility genes to breast cancer by whole-exome sequencing and targeted enrichment sequencing of candidate genes in women of European ancestry},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {14},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14143363},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281768},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Rare variants in at least 10 genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, are associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, these variants, in combination with common variants identified through genome-wide association studies, explain only a fraction of the familial aggregation of the disease. To identify further susceptibility genes, we performed a two-stage whole-exome sequencing study. In the discovery stage, samples from 1528 breast cancer cases enriched for breast cancer susceptibility and 3733 geographically matched unaffected controls were sequenced. Using five different filtering and gene prioritization strategies, 198 genes were selected for further validation. These genes, and a panel of 32 known or suspected breast cancer susceptibility genes, were assessed in a validation set of 6211 cases and 6019 controls for their association with risk of breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor (ER) disease subtypes, using gene burden tests applied to loss-of-function and rare missense variants. Twenty genes showed nominal evidence of association (p-value < 0.05) with either overall or subtype-specific breast cancer. Our study had the statistical power to detect susceptibility genes with effect sizes similar to ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, however, it was underpowered to identify genes in which susceptibility variants are rarer or confer smaller effect sizes. Larger sample sizes would be required in order to identify such genes.},
  language  = {en}
}