@article{KesslerHertelJungkunstetal.2012,
  author    = {Kessler, Michael and Hertel, Dietrich and Jungkunst, Hermann F. and Kluge, J{\"u}rgen and Abrahamczyk, Stefan and Bos, Merijn and Buchori, Damayanti and Gerold, Gerhard and Gradstein, S. Robbert and K{\"o}hler, Stefan and Leuschner, Christoph and Moser, Gerald and Pitopang, Ramadhanil and Saleh, Shahabuddin and Schulze, Christian H. and Sporn, Simone G. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Tjitrosoedirdjo, Sri S. and Tscharntke, Teja},
  title     = {Can Joint Carbon and Biodiversity Management in Tropical Agroforestry Landscapes Be Optimized?},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0047192},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-132016},
  pages     = {e47192},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Managing ecosystems for carbon storage may also benefit biodiversity conservation, but such a potential 'win-win' scenario has not yet been assessed for tropical agroforestry landscapes. We measured above-and below-ground carbon stocks as well as the species richness of four groups of plants and eight of animals on 14 representative plots in Sulawesi, Indonesia, ranging from natural rainforest to cacao agroforests that have replaced former natural forest. The conversion of natural forests with carbon stocks of 227-362 Mg C ha\(^{-1}\) to agroforests with 82-211 Mg C ha\(^{-1}\) showed no relationships to overall biodiversity but led to a significant loss of forest-related species richness. We conclude that the conservation of the forest-related biodiversity, and to a lesser degree of carbon stocks, mainly depends on the preservation of natural forest habitats. In the three most carbon-rich agroforestry systems, carbon stocks were about 60\% of those of natural forest, suggesting that 1.6 ha of optimally managed agroforest can contribute to the conservation of carbon stocks as much as 1 ha of natural forest. However, agroforestry systems had comparatively low biodiversity, and we found no evidence for a tight link between carbon storage and biodiversity. Yet, potential win-win agroforestry management solutions include combining high shade-tree quality which favours biodiversity with cacao-yield adapted shade levels.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SherifInceManiucetal.2015,
  author    = {Sherif, Mohammad A. and Ince, H{\"u}seyin and Maniuc, Octavian and Reiter, Therese and Voelker, Wolfram and Ertl, Georg and {\"O}ner, Alper},
  title     = {Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annular sizing in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation},
  series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  number    = {181},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12872-015-0181-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136002},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Accurate preoperative assessment of the aortic annulus dimension is crucial for successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In this study we examined the accuracy of a novel method using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) for measurement of the aortic annulus. Methods: We evaluated the theoretical impact of the measurement of the annulus diameter and area using the circumcircle of a triangle method on the decision to perform the procedure and choice of the prosthesis size. Results: Sixty-three consecutive patients were scheduled for TAVI. Mean age was 82 +/- 4 years, and 25 patients (55.6 \%) were female. Mean aortic annulus diameter was 20.3 +/- 2.2 mm assessed by TEE on the mid-esophageal long-axis view and 23.9 +/- 2.3 mm using CT (p < 0.001). There was a tendency for the TEE derived areas using the new method to be higher (p < 0.001). The TEE measurements were on average 42.33 mm(2) higher than the CT measurements without an evidence of a systematic over-or under-sizing (p = 1.00). Agreement between TEE and CT chosen valve sizes was good overall (kappa = 0.67 and weighted kappa = 0.71). For patients who turned out to have no AR, the two methods agreed in 84.6 \% of patients. Conclusions: CT remanis the gold standard in sizing of the aortic valve annulus. Nevertheless, sizing of the aortic valve annulus using TEE derived area may be helpful. The impact of integration of this method in the algorithm of aortic annulus sizing on the outcome of patients undergoing TAVI should be examined in future studies.},
  language  = {en}
}