@phdthesis{Endres2019,
  author    = {Endres, Ralph Julian},
  title     = {Networks of fear: Functional connectivity of the amygdala, the insula and the anterior cingulate cortex in two subtypes of specific phobia},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-18095},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-180950},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Neuroimaging research has highlighted the relevance of well-balanced functional brain interactions as an essential basis for efficient emotion regulation. In contrast, abnormal coupling of fear-processing regions such as the amygdala, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the insula could be an important feature of anxiety disorders. Although activity alterations of these regions have been frequently reported in specific phobia, little is known about their functional interactions during phobogenic stimulus processing. To explore these interrelationships in two subtypes of specific phobia - i.e., the blood-injection-injury subtype and the animal subtype - functional connectivity (FC) was analyzed in three fMRI studies. Two studies examined fear processing in a dental phobia group (DP), a snake phobia group (SP) and a healthy control group (HC) during visual phobogenic stimuli presentation while a third study investigated differences between auditory and visual stimuli presentation in DP and HC. Due to a priori hypotheses of impaired interactions between the amygdala, the ACC and the insula, a first analysis was conducted to explore the FC within these three regions of interest. Based on emerging evidence of functionally diverse subregions, the ACC was further divided into a subgenual, pregenual and dorsal ACC and the insula was divided into a ventral-anterior, dorsal-anterior and posterior region. Additionally, an exploratory seed-to-voxel analysis using the amygdala, ACC and insula as seeds was conducted to scan for connectivity patterns across the whole brain. The analyses revealed a negative connectivity of the ACC and the amygdala during phobogenic stimulus processing in controls. This connectivity was predominantly driven by the affective ACC subdivision. By contrast, SP was characterized by an increased mean FC between the examined regions. Interestingly, this phenomenon was specific for auditory, but not visual symptom provocation in DP. During visual stimulus presentation, however, DP exhibited further FC alterations of the ACC and the insula with pre- and orbitofrontal regions. These findings mark the importance of balanced interactions between fear-processing regions in specific phobia, particularly of the inhibitory connectivity between the ACC and the amygdala. Theoretically, this is assumed to reflect top-down inhibition by the ACC during emotion regulation. The findings support the suggestion that SP particularly is characterized by excitatory, or missing inhibitory, (para-) limbic connectivity, reflecting an overshooting fear response based on evolutionary conserved autonomic bottom-up pathways. Some of these characteristics applied to DP as well but only under the auditory stimulation, pointing to stimulus dependency. DP was further marked by altered pre- and orbitofrontal coupling with the ACC and the insula which might represent disturbances of superordinate cognitive control on basal emotion processes. These observations strengthen the assumption that DP is predominantly based on evaluation-based fear responses. In conclusion, the connectivity patterns found may depict an intermediate phenotype that possibly confers risks for inappropriate phobic fear responses. The findings presented could also be of clinical interest. Particularly the ACC - amygdala circuit may be used as a predictive biomarker for treatment response or as a promising target for neuroscience-focused augmentation strategies as neurofeedback or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.},
  subject      = {Kernspintomografie},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Gerdes2008,
  author    = {Gerdes, Antje B. M.},
  title     = {Preferential Processing of Phobic Cues : Attention and Perception in Spider Phobic Patients},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-28684},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Cognitive views of the psychopathology of anxiety propose that attentional biases toward threatening information play a substantial role in the disorders' etiology and maintenance. For healthy subjects, converging evidence show that threatening stimuli attract attention and lead to enhanced activation in visual processing areas. It is assumed that this preferential processing of threat occurs at a preattentive level and is followed by fast attentional engagement. High-anxious individuals show augmented tendencies to selectively attend toward fear-relevant cues (Mathews, 1990) and exhibit elevated neural processing of threatening cues compared to non-anxious individuals (Dilger et al., 2003). Regarding attentional biases in high-anxious subjects, it remains unanswered up to now whether initial engagement of attention toward threat or difficulties to disengage from threat is an underlying mechanism. Furthermore, little is known whether the preferential (attentive) processing of threatening cues does influence perceptional outcomes of anxious subjects. In order to directly study separate components of attentional bias the first study of this dissertation was a combined reaction time and eye-tracking experiment. Twenty one spider phobic patients and 21 control participants were instructed to search for a neutral target while ignoring task-irrelevant abrupt-onset distractor circles which contained either a small picture of a spider (phobic), a flower (non-phobic, but similar to spiders in shape), a mushroom (non-phobic, and not similar to spiders in shape), or small circles with no picture. As expected, patients' reaction times to targets were longer on trials with spider distractors. However, analyses of eye movements revealed that this was not due to attentional capture by spider distractors; patients more often fixated on all distractors with pictures. Instead, reaction times were delayed by longer fixation durations on spider distractors. This result does not support automatic capture of attention by phobic cues but suggests that phobic patients fail to disengage attention from spiders. To assess whether preferential processing of phobic cues differentially affects visual perception in phobic patients compared to healthy controls, the second study of this dissertation used a binocular rivalry paradigm, where two incompatible pictures were presented to each eye. These pictures cannot be merged to a meaningful percept and temporarily, one picture predominates in conscious perception whereas the other is suppressed. 23 spider phobic patients and 20 non-anxious control participants were shown standardized pictures of spiders or flowers, each paired with a neutral pattern under conditions of binocular rivalry. Their task was to continuously indicate the predominant percept by key presses. Analyses show that spider phobic patients perceived the spider picture more often and longer as dominant compared to non-anxious control participants. Thus, predominance of phobic cues in binocular rivalry provides evidence that preferential processing of fear-relevant cues in the visual system actually leads to superior perception. In combination both studies support the notion that phobic patients process phobic cues preferentially within the visual system resulting in enhanced attention and perception. At early stages of visual processing, this is mainly reflected by delayed attentional disengagement and across time, preferential processing leads to improved perception of threat cues.},
  subject      = {Phobie},
  language  = {en}
}