@article{DavisYuKeenanetal.2013, author = {Davis, Lea K. and Yu, Dongmei and Keenan, Clare L. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Konkashbaev, Anuar I. and Derks, Eske M. and Neale, Benjamin M. and Yang, Jian and Lee, S. Hong and Evans, Patrick and Barr, Cathy L. and Bellodi, Laura and Benarroch, Fortu and Berrio, Gabriel Bedoya and Bienvenu, Oscar J. and Bloch, Michael H. and Blom, Rianne M. and Bruun, Ruth D. and Budman, Cathy L. and Camarena, Beatriz and Campbell, Desmond and Cappi, Carolina and Cardona Silgado, Julio C. and Cath, Danielle C. and Cavallini, Maria C. and Chavira, Denise A. and Chouinard, Sylvian and Conti, David V. and Cook, Edwin H. and Coric, Vladimir and Cullen, Bernadette A. and Deforce, Dieter and Delorme, Richard and Dion, Yves and Edlund, Christopher K. and Egberts, Karin and Falkai, Peter and Fernandez, Thomas V. and Gallagher, Patience J. and Garrido, Helena and Geller, Daniel and Girard, Simon L. and Grabe, Hans J. and Grados, Marco A. and Greenberg, Benjamin D. and Gross-Tsur, Varda and Haddad, Stephen and Heiman, Gary A. and Hemmings, Sian M. J. and Hounie, Ana G. and Illmann, Cornelia and Jankovic, Joseph and Jenike, Micheal A. and Kennedy, James L. and King, Robert A. and Kremeyer, Barbara and Kurlan, Roger and Lanzagorta, Nuria and Leboyer, Marion and Leckman, James F. and Lennertz, Leonhard and Liu, Chunyu and Lochner, Christine and Lowe, Thomas L. and Macciardi, Fabio and McCracken, James T. and McGrath, Lauren M. and Restrepo, Sandra C. Mesa and Moessner, Rainald and Morgan, Jubel and Muller, Heike and Murphy, Dennis L. and Naarden, Allan L. and Ochoa, William Cornejo and Ophoff, Roel A. and Osiecki, Lisa and Pakstis, Andrew J. and Pato, Michele T. and Pato, Carlos N. and Piacentini, John and Pittenger, Christopher and Pollak, Yehunda and Rauch, Scott L. and Renner, Tobias J. and Reus, Victor I. and Richter, Margaret A. and Riddle, Mark A. and Robertson, Mary M. and Romero, Roxana and Ros{\`a}rio, Maria C. and Rosenberg, David and Rouleau, Guy A. and Ruhrmann, Stephan and Ruiz-Linares, Andreas and Sampaio, Aline S. and Samuels, Jack and Sandor, Paul and Sheppard, Broke and Singer, Harvey S. and Smit, Jan H. and Stein, Dan J. and Strengman, E. and Tischfield, Jay A. and Valencia Duarte, Ana V. and Vallada, Homero and Van Nieuwerburgh, Flip and Veenstra-VanderWeele, Jeremy and Walitza, Susanne and Wang, Ying and Wendland, Jens R. and Westenberg, Herman G. M. and Shugart, Yin Yao and Miguel, Euripedes C. and McMahon, William and Wagner, Michael and Nicolini, Humberto and Posthuma, Danielle and Hanna, Gregory L. and Heutink, Peter and Denys, Damiaan and Arnold, Paul D. and Oostra, Ben A. and Nestadt, Gerald and Freimer, Nelson B. and Pauls, David L. and Wray, Naomi R. and Stewart, S. Evelyn and Mathews, Carol A. and Knowles, James A. and Cox, Nancy J. and Scharf, Jeremiah M.}, title = {Partitioning the Heritability of Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Reveals Differences in Genetic Architecture}, series = {PLoS Genetics}, volume = {9}, journal = {PLoS Genetics}, number = {10}, issn = {1553-7390}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1003864}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127377}, pages = {e1003864}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5\% accounted for 21\% of the TS heritability and 0\% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.}, language = {en} } @article{LepetaLourencoSchweitzeretal.2016, author = {Lepeta, Katarzyna and Lourenco, Mychael V. and Schweitzer, Barbara C. and Martino Adami, Pamela V. and Banerjee, Priyanjalee and Catuara-Solarz, Silvina and de la Fuente Revenga, Mario and Marc Guillem, Alain and Haider, Mouna and Ijomone, Omamuyovwi M. and Nadorp, Bettina and Qi, Lin and Perera, Nirma D. and Refsgaard, Louise K. and Reid, Kimberley M. and Sabbar, Mariam and Sahoo, Arghyadip and Schaefer, Natascha and Sheean, Rebecca K. and Suska, Anna and Verma, Rajkumar and Vicidomini, Cinzia and Wright, Dean and Zhang, Xing-Ding and Seidenbecher, Constanze}, title = {Synaptopathies: synaptic dysfunction in neurological disorders - a review from students to students}, series = {Journal of Neurochemistry}, volume = {138}, journal = {Journal of Neurochemistry}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1111/jnc.13713}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187509}, pages = {785-805}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Synapses are essential components of neurons and allow information to travel coordinately throughout the nervous system to adjust behavior to environmental stimuli and to control body functions, memories, and emotions. Thus, optimal synaptic communication is required for proper brain physiology, and slight perturbations of synapse function can lead to brain disorders. In fact, increasing evidence has demonstrated the relevance of synapse dysfunction as a major determinant of many neurological diseases. This notion has led to the concept of synaptopathies as brain diseases with synapse defects as shared pathogenic features. In this review, which was initiated at the 13th International Society for Neurochemistry Advanced School, we discuss basic concepts of synapse structure and function, and provide a critical view of how aberrant synapse physiology may contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders (autism, Down syndrome, startle disease, and epilepsy) as well as neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer and Parkinson disease). We finally discuss the appropriateness and potential implications of gathering synapse diseases under a single term. Understanding common causes and intrinsic differences in disease-associated synaptic dysfunction could offer novel clues toward synapse-based therapeutic intervention for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. In this Review, which was initiated at the 13th International Society for Neurochemistry (ISN) Advanced School, we discuss basic concepts of synapse structure and function, and provide a critical view of how aberrant synapse physiology may contribute to neurodevelopmental (autism, Down syndrome, startle disease, and epilepsy) as well as neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases), gathered together under the term of synaptopathies. Read the Editorial Highlight for this article on page .}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Reichenbach2020, author = {Reichenbach, Juliane Renate}, title = {Paternal age effects on sperm DNA methylation and its impact on the next generation}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-19980}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-199805}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The effect of late parenthood on the offspring´s physical and mental health status has recently become an increasingly important topic of discussion. Studies on neurodevelopmental disorders in children of older parents (Naserbakht et al., 2011) outline the negative consequences of aging fathers as unpredictable compared to the better-understood unfavorable maternal influences (Cedars et al. 2015). This may be due to the fact that lifelong production of male gametes becomes more susceptible to error, not only for somatic mutations. Non-genomic mechanisms such as epigenetic methylation also alter DNA dynamically throughout life (Jones et al., 2015) and influence the aging human sperm DNA (Jenkins et al., 2014). These methylation changes may be transmitted to the next generation via epigenetic inheritance mechanisms (Milekic et al., 2015), which may negatively impact the sensitive epigenetic regulation of cell differentiation in the embryonic period (Curley et al., 2011; Spiers et al., 2015). Accordingly, Nardone et al. (2014) reported several hypomethylated regions in autistic patients, illustrating potential epigenetic influences on the multifactorial pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders. In the present study, the methylation status of five gene regions in the sperm DNA of males of different ages was analyzed by two techniques - pyrosequencing and deep bisulfite sequencing. Two gene regions, FOXK1 and DMPK, showed a highly significant age-related methylation loss and FOXK1 a reduced methylation variation at the level of single alleles. In addition, the examined gene region of FOXK1 showed significant methylation changes in the fetal cord blood DNA of the respective offspring of the sperm donor. This fact suggests a transfer of age-related methylation loss to the next generation. Interestingly, a methylation analysis at the level of single alleles showed that the methylation loss was inherited exclusively by the father. FOXK1 is a transcription factor that plays an important role in the epigenetic regulation of the cell cycle during embryonic neuronal development (Huang et al., 2004; Wijchers et al., 2006). For this reason, the methylation status of FOXK1 in the blood of autistic patients and an age- and sex-matched control group was investigated. While both groups showed age-associated FOXK1 methylation loss, a faster dynamics of methylation change was observed in the autistic group. Although further studies are needed to uncover inheritance mechanisms of epigenetic information, the present results show an evident influence of age-related methylation changes on offspring. When advising future fathers, it is important to consider how the paternal epigenome is altered by aging and can have a negative impact on the developing embryo.}, subject = {Epigenetik}, language = {en} } @article{UppalGianatiempoWicinskietal.2014, author = {Uppal, Neha and Gianatiempo, Isabella and Wicinski, Bridget and Schmeidler, James and Heinsen, Helmut and Schmitz, Christoph and Buxbaum, Joseph D. and Hof, Patrick R.}, title = {Neuropathology of the posteroinferior occipitotemporal gyrus in children with autism}, series = {Molecular Autism}, volume = {5}, journal = {Molecular Autism}, number = {17}, doi = {10.1186/2040-2392-5-17}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117275}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background: While most neuropathologic studies focus on regions involved in behavioral abnormalities in autism, it is also important to identify whether areas that appear functionally normal are devoid of pathologic alterations. In this study we analyzed the posteroinferior occipitotemporal gyrus, an extrastriate area not considered to be affected in autism. This area borders the fusiform gyrus, which is known to exhibit functional and cellular abnormalities in autism. Findings: No studies have implicated posteroinferior occipitotemporal gyrus dysfunction in autism, leading us to hypothesize that neuropathology would not occur in this area. We indeed observed no significant differences in pyramidal neuron number or size in layers III, V, and VI in seven pairs of autism and controls. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that neuropathology is unique to areas involved in stereotypies and social and emotional behaviors, and support the specificity of the localization of pathology in the fusiform gyrus.}, language = {en} }