@article{SchuhmannBittnerMeuthetal.2015, author = {Schuhmann, Michael K. and Bittner, Stefan and Meuth, Sven G. and Kleinschnitz, Christoph and Fluri, Felix}, title = {Fingolimod (FTY720-P) does not stabilize the blood-brain barrier under inflammatory conditions in an in vitro model}, series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences}, volume = {16}, journal = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences}, doi = {10.3390/ijms161226177}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145047}, pages = {29454-29466}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an early hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS), a progressive inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Cell adhesion in the BBB is modulated by sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a signaling protein, via S1P receptors (S1P\(_1\)). Fingolimod phosphate (FTY720-P) a functional S1P\(_1\) antagonist has been shown to improve the relapse rate in relapsing-remitting MS by preventing the egress of lymphocytes from lymph nodes. However, its role in modulating BBB permeabilityin particular, on the tight junction proteins occludin, claudin 5 and ZO-1has not been well elucidated to date. In the present study, FTY720-P did not change the transendothelial electrical resistance in a rat brain microvascular endothelial cell (RBMEC) culture exposed to inflammatory conditions and thus did not decrease endothelial barrier permeability. In contrast, occludin was reduced in RBMEC culture after adding FTY720-P. Additionally, FTY720-P did not alter the amount of endothelial matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and MMP-2 in RBMEC cultures. Taken together, our observations support the assumption that S1P\(_1\) plays a dual role in vascular permeability, depending on its ligand. Thus, S1P\(_1\) provides a mechanistic basis for FTY720-P-associated disruption of endothelial barrierssuch as the blood-retinal barrierwhich might result in macular edema.}, language = {en} } @article{CoenenAmtageVolkmannetal.2015, author = {Coenen, Volker A. and Amtage, Florian and Volkmann, Jens and Schl{\"a}pfer, Thomas E.}, title = {Deep Brain Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders}, series = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International}, volume = {112}, journal = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International}, doi = {10.3238/arztebl.2015.0519}, pages = {519 -- 526}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the chronic electrical stimulation of selected target sites in the brain through stereotactically implanted electrodes. More than 150 000 patients around the world have been treated to date with DBS for medically intractable conditions. The indications for DBS include movement disorders, epilepsy, and some types of mental illness. Methods: This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library, and on the current guidelines of the German Neurological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Neurologie, DGN). Results: DBS is usually performed to treat neurological diseases, most often movement disorders and, in particular, Parkinson's disease. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that DBS improves tremor, dyskinesia, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease by 25\% to 50\%, depending on the rating scales used. DBS for tremor usually involves stimulation in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical regulatory loop. In an RCT of DBS for the treatment of primary generalized dystonia, the patients who underwent DBS experienced a 39.3\% improvement of dystonia, compared to only 4.9\% in the control group. Two multicenter trials of DBS for depression were terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. Conclusion: DBS is an established treatment for various neurological and psychiatric diseases. It has been incorporated in the DGN guidelines and is now considered a standard treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. The safety and efficacy of DBS can be expected to improve with the application of new technical developments in electrode geometry and new imaging techniques. Controlled trials would be helpful so that DBS could be extended to further indications, particularly psychiatric ones.}, language = {en} }