@phdthesis{Delto2015,
  author    = {Delto, Carolyn Francesca},
  title     = {Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the GABA(A) Receptor Interacting Protein Muskelin},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115922},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In a study from 2011, the protein muskelin was described as a central coordinator of the retrograde transport of GABA(A) receptors in neurons. As muskelin governs the transport along actin filaments as well as microtubules, it might be the first representative of a novel class of regulators, which coordinate cargo transport across the borders of these two independent systems of transport paths and their associated motorproteins. To establish a basis for understanding the mode of operation of muskelin, the aim of this thesis was an in-depth biochemical and structural characterization of muskelin and its interaction with the GABA(A) receptor. One focus of the work was the analysis of the oligomerization of muskelin. As could be demonstrated, the oligomerization is based on two independent interactions mediated by different domains of the protein: a known interaction of the N-terminal discoidin domain with the C-terminal portion, termed head-to-tail interaction, and a dimerization of the LisH motif in muskelin that was so far neglected in the literature. For the detailed studies of both binding events, the solution of a crystal structure of a fragment of muskelin, comprising the Discoidin domain and the LisH motif, was an important basis. The fragment crystallized as a dimer, with dimerization being mediated solely by the LisH motif. Biochemical analysis corroborated that the LisH motif in muskelin serves as a dimerization element, and, moreover, showed that the C-terminal domain of the protein substantially stabilizes this dimerization. In addition, the crystal structure revealed the molecular composition of the surface of the head in the head-to-tail interaction, namely the discoidin domain. This information enabled to map the amino acids contributing to binding, which showed that the binding site of the head-to-tail interaction coincides with the generic ligand binding site of the discoidin domain. As part of the analyses, residues that are critical for LisH-dimerization and the head-to-tail binding, respectively, were identified, whose mutation specifically interfered with each of the interactions separately. These mutations allowed to investigate the interplay of these interactions during oligomerization. It could be shown that recombinant muskelin assembles into a tetramer to which both interactions, the LisH-dimerization and the head-to-tail binding, contribute independently. When one of the two interactions was disturbed, only a dimer mediated via the respective other interaction could be formed; when both interactions were disturbed, the protein was present as monomer. Furthermore, Frank Heisler in the group of Matthias Kneussel was able to show the drastic impact of an impaired LisH-dimerization on muskelin in cells using these mutations. Disturbing the LisH-dimerization led to a complete redistribution of the originally cytoplasmic muskelin to the nucleus which was accompanied by a severe impairment of its function during GABA(A) receptor transport. Following up on these results in an analysis of muskelin variants, for which alterations of the subcellular localization had been published earlier, the crucial influence of LisH-dimerization to the subcellular localization and thereby the role of muskelin in the cell was confirmed. The biochemical studies of the interaction of muskelin and the alpha1 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor demonstrated a direct binding with an affinity in the low micromolar range, which is mediated primarily by the kelch repeat domain in muskelin. For the binding site on the GABA(A) receptor, it was confirmed that the thirteen most C-terminal residues of the intracellular domain are critical for the binding of muskelin. In accordance with the strong conservation of these residues among the alpha subunits of the GABA(A) receptor, it could be shown that an interaction with muskelin in vitro is also possible for the alpha2 and alpha5 subunits. Based on the comparison of the binding sites between the homologous subunits, tentative conclusions can be drawn about the details of the binding, which may serve as a starting point for follow-up studies. This thesis thereby makes valuable contributions to the understanding of muskelin, in particular the significance of its oligomerization. It furthermore provides an experimental framework for future studies that address related topics, such as the characterization of other muskelin interaction partners, or the questions raised in this work.},
  subject      = {Oligomerisation},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Klemm2020,
  author    = {Klemm, Theresa Antonia},
  title     = {Minor differences cause major effects: How differential oligomerization regulates the activities of USP25 and USP28},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-19108},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191080},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Deubiquitinases are regulators of the ubiquitin proteasome system that counteract the ubiquitination cascade by removing ubiquitin from substrates and cleaving ubiquitin chains. Due to their involvment in various important pathways, they are associated with several diseases and may thus present promising drug targets. The two related ubiquitin specific proteases USP25 and USP28 share a highly conserved amino acid sequence but perform distinct biological functions. USP28 plays roles in cell cycle regulation and was also linked to several types of cancer. It adopts oncogenic functions by rescuing the oncoproteins MYC and JUN from proteasomal degradation, which is induced by the E3-ligase SCF (FBW7). Opposingly, USP28 also regulates the stability of the tumor suppressor FBW7 itself. USP25 contributes to a balanced innate immune system by stabilizing TRAF3 and TRAF6 and lately was found to promote Wnt-signaling by deubiquitinating TNKS. Due to the high level of identity of both proteases, a recent attempt to inhibit USP28 led to cross reactivity against USP25. In our study, we characterized both USP25 and USP28 structurally and functionally using x-ray crystallography, biochemical as well as biophysical approaches to determine similarities and differences that can be exploited for the development of specific inhibitors. The crystal structure of the USP28 catalytic domain revealed a cherry-couple like dimer that mediates self-association by an inserted helical subdomain, the USP25/28 catalytic domain inserted domain (UCID). In USP25, the UCID leads to formation of a tetramer composed of two interlinked USP28-like dimers. Structural and functional analysis revealed that the dimeric USP28 is active, whereas the tetrameric USP25 is auto inhibited. Disruption of the tetramer by a cancer-associated mutation or a deletion-variant activates USP25 through dimer formation in in vitro assays and leads to an increased stability of TNKS in cell studies. Furthermore, in vitro data showed that neither ubiquitin nor substrate binding led to the activation of the USP25 tetramer construct. With the structure of the C-terminal domain of USP25, we determined the last unknown region in the enzyme as a separately folded domain that mediates substrate interactions. Combined the structures of the USP25 and USP28 catalytic domains and the functional characterization of both enzymes provide novel insights into the regulation of USPs by oligomerization. Furthermore, we identified individual features of each protease that might be explored for the development of specific small molecule inhibitors.},
  subject      = {Oligomerisation},
  language  = {en}
}