@article{WelterWagnerFurtwaengleretal.2021,
  author    = {Welter, Nils and Wagner, Angelo and Furtw{\"a}ngler, Rhoikos and Melchior, Patrick and Kager, Leo and Vokuhl, Christian and Schenk, Jens-Peter and Meier, Clemens Magnus and Siemer, Stefan and Gessler, Manfred and Graf, Norbert},
  title     = {Characteristics of nephroblastoma/nephroblastomatosis in children with a clinically reported underlying malformation or cancer predisposition syndrome},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {19},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13195016},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-248434},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: about 10\% of Wilms Tumor (WT) patients have a malformation or cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) with causative germline genetic or epigenetic variants. Knowledge on CPS is essential for genetic counselling. (2) Methods: this retrospective analysis focused on 2927 consecutive patients with WTs registered between 1989 and 2017 in the SIOP/GPOH studies. (3) Results: Genitourinary malformations (GU, N = 66, 2.3\%), Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (BWS, N = 32, 1.1\%), isolated hemihypertrophy (IHH, N = 29, 1.0\%), Denys-Drash syndrome (DDS, N = 24, 0.8\%) and WAGR syndrome (N = 20, 0.7\%) were reported most frequently. Compared to others, these patients were younger at WT diagnosis (median age 24.5 months vs. 39.0 months), had smaller tumors (349.4 mL vs. 487.5 mL), less often metastasis (8.2\% vs. 18\%), but more often nephroblastomatosis (12.9\% vs. 1.9\%). WT with IHH was associated with blastemal WT and DDS with stromal subtype. Bilateral WTs were common in WAGR (30\%), DDS (29\%) and BWS (31\%). Chemotherapy induced reduction in tumor volume was poor in DDS (0.4\% increase) and favorable in BWS (86.9\% reduction). The event-free survival (EFS) of patients with BWS was significantly (p = 0.002) worse than in others. (4) Conclusions: CPS should be considered in WTs with specific clinical features resulting in referral to a geneticist. Their outcome was not always favorable.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WelterWagnerFurtwaengleretal.2021,
  author    = {Welter, Nils and Wagner, Angelo and Furtw{\"a}ngler, Rhoikos and Melchior, Patrick and Kager, Leo and Vokuhl, Christian and Schenk, Jens-Peter and Meier, Clemens Magnus and Siemer, Stefan and Gessler, Manfred and Graf, Norbert},
  title     = {Correction: Welter et al. Characteristics of nephroblastoma/nephroblastomatosis in children with a clinically reported underlying malformation or cancer predisposition syndrome. Cancers 2021, 13, 5016},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {22},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13225743},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250135},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In the original article [1] there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. Table 2 contains wrong percentages in lines Bilateral disease and Patients with CPS or GU. For this reason the table should be replaced with the correct one as shown below.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NemesJohannSteinbuegletal.2022,
  author    = {Nemes, Karolina and Johann, Pascal D. and Steinb{\"u}gl, Mona and Gruhle, Miriam and Bens, Susanne and Kachanov, Denis and Teleshova, Margarita and Hauser, Peter and Simon, Thorsten and Tippelt, Stephan and Eberl, Wolfgang and Chada, Martin and Lopez, Vicente Santa-Maria and Grigull, Lorenz and Hern{\´a}iz-Driever, Pablo and Eyrich, Matthias and Pears, Jane and Milde, Till and Reinhard, Harald and Leipold, Alfred and van de Wetering, Marianne and Gil-da-Costa, Maria Jo{\~a}o and Ebetsberger-Dachs, Georg and Kerl, Kornelius and Lemmer, Andreas and Boztug, Heidrun and Furtw{\"a}ngler, Rhoikos and Kordes, Uwe and Vokuhl, Christian and Hasselblatt, Martin and Bison, Brigitte and Kr{\"o}ncke, Thomas and Melchior, Patrick and Timmermann, Beate and Gerss, Joachim and Siebert, Reiner and Fr{\"u}hwald, Michael C.},
  title     = {Infants and newborns with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors (eMRT) in the EU-RHAB registry: a unique and challenging population},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14092185},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270730},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) predominantly affect infants and young children. Patients below six months of age represent a particularly therapeutically challenging group. Toxicity to developing organ sites limits intensity of treatment. Information on prognostic factors, genetics, toxicity of treatment and long-term outcomes is sparse. Methods: Clinical, genetic, and treatment data of 100 patients (aged below 6 months at diagnosis) from 13 European countries were analyzed (2005-2020). Tumors and matching blood samples were examined for SMARCB1 mutations using FISH, MLPA and Sanger sequencing. DNA methylation subgroups (ATRT-TYR, ATRT-SHH, and ATRT-MYC) were determined using 450 k / 850 k-profiling. Results: A total of 45 patients presented with ATRT, 29 with extracranial, extrarenal (eMRT) and 9 with renal rhabdoid tumors (RTK). Seventeen patients demonstrated synchronous tumors (SYN). Metastases (M+) were present in 27\% (26/97) at diagnosis. A germline mutation (GLM) was detected in 55\% (47/86). DNA methylation subgrouping was available in 50\% (31 / 62) with ATRT or SYN; for eMRT, methylation-based subgrouping was not performed. The 5-year overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) rates were 23.5 ± 4.6\% and 19 ± 4.1\%, respectively. Male sex (11 ± 5\% vs. 35.8 ± 7.4\%), M+ stage (6.1 ± 5.4\% vs. 36.2 ± 7.4\%), presence of SYN (7.1 ± 6.9\% vs. 26.6 ± 5.3\%) and GLM (7.7 ± 4.2\% vs. 45.7 ± 8.6\%) were significant prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Molecular subgrouping and survival analyses confirm a previously described survival advantage for ATRT-TYR. In an adjusted multivariate model, clinical factors that favorably influence the prognosis were female sex, localized stage, absence of a GLM and maintenance therapy. Conclusions: In this cohort of homogenously treated infants with MRT, significant predictors of outcome were sex, M-stage, GLM and maintenance therapy. We confirm the need to stratify which patient groups benefit from multimodal treatment, and which need novel therapeutic strategies. Biomarker-driven tailored trials may be a key option.},
  language  = {en}
}