@article{KannBruennertHansenetal.2020, author = {Kann, Simone and Bruennert, Daniela and Hansen, Jessica and Concha Mendoza, Gustavo Andr{\´e}s and Crespo Gonzalez, Jos{\´e} Jos{\´e} and Armenta Quintero, Cielo Leonor and Hanke, Miriam and Hagen, Ralf Matthias and Backhaus, Joy and Frickmann, Hagen}, title = {High prevalence of intestinal pathogens in Indigenous in Colombia}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {9}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm9092786}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-211289}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background: Intestinal infections remain a major public health burden in developing countries. Due to social, ecological, environmental, and cultural conditions, Indigenous peoples in Colombia are at particularly high risk. Materials: 137 stool samples were analyzed by microscopy and real-time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), targeting protozoan parasites (Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium spp., and Cyclospora cayetanensis), bacteria (Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella ssp./enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Yersinia spp., enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxin-producing E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), and Tropheryma whipplei), and helminths (Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma spp., Trichuris. trichiura, Taenia spp., Hymenolepis nana, Enterobius vermicularis, and Schistosoma spp.). Microscopy found additional cases of helminth infections. Results: At least one pathogen was detected in 93\% of the samples. The overall results revealed protozoa in 79\%, helminths in 69\%, and bacteria in 41\%. G. intestinalis (48\%), Necator/hookworm (27\%), and EAEC (68\%) were the most common in each group. Noteworthy, T. whipplei was positive in 7\% and T. trichirua in 23\% of the samples. A significant association of one infection promoting the other was determined for G. intestinalis and C. jejuni, helminth infections, and EIEC. Conclusions: The results illustrate the high burden of gastrointestinal pathogens among Indigenous peoples compared to other developing countries. Countermeasures are urgently required.}, language = {en} } @article{KannKunzHansenetal.2020, author = {Kann, Simone and Kunz, Meik and Hansen, Jessica and Sievertsen, J{\"u}rgen and Crespo, Jose J. and Loperena, Aristides and Arriens, Sandra and Dandekar, Thomas}, title = {Chagas disease: detection of Trypanosoma cruzi by a new, high-specific real time PCR}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {5}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm9051517}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-205746}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background: Chagas disease (CD) is a major burden in Latin America, expanding also to non-endemic countries. A gold standard to detect the CD causing pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi is currently not available. Existing real time polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) lack sensitivity and/or specificity. We present a new, highly specific RT-PCR for the diagnosis and monitoring of CD. Material and Methods: We analyzed 352 serum samples from Indigenous people living in high endemic CD areas of Colombia using three leading RT-PCRs (k-DNA-, TCZ-, 18S rRNA-PCR), the newly developed one (NDO-PCR), a Rapid Test/enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA), and immunofluorescence. Eighty-seven PCR-products were verified by sequence analysis after plasmid vector preparation. Results: The NDO-PCR showed the highest sensitivity (92.3\%), specificity (100\%), and accuracy (94.3\%) for T. cruzi detection in the 87 sequenced samples. Sensitivities and specificities of the kDNA-PCR were 89.2\%/22.7\%, 20.5\%/100\% for TCZ-PCR, and 1.5\%/100\% for the 18S rRNA-PCR. The kDNA-PCR revealed a 77.3\% false positive rate, mostly due to cross-reactions with T. rangeli (NDO-PCR 0\%). TCZ- and 18S rRNA-PCR showed a false negative rate of 79.5\% and 98.5\% (NDO-PCR 7.7\%), respectively. Conclusions: The NDO-PCR demonstrated the highest specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy compared to leading PCRs. Together with serologic tests, it can be considered as a reliable tool for CD detection and can improve CD management significantly.}, language = {en} }