@article{GoetzPanzerTrinksetal.2020, author = {G{\"o}tz, Ralph and Panzer, Sabine and Trinks, Nora and Eilts, Janna and Wagener, Johannes and Turr{\`a}, David and Di Pietro, Antonio and Sauer, Markus and Terpitz, Ulrich}, title = {Expansion Microscopy for Cell Biology Analysis in Fungi}, series = {Frontiers in Microbiology}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Microbiology}, issn = {1664-302X}, doi = {10.3389/fmicb.2020.00574}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202569}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Super-resolution microscopy has evolved as a powerful method for subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging of cells and cellular organelles, but requires sophisticated and expensive installations. Expansion microscopy (ExM), which is based on the physical expansion of the cellular structure of interest, provides a cheap alternative to bypass the diffraction limit and enable super-resolution imaging on a conventional fluorescence microscope. While ExM has shown impressive results for the magnified visualization of proteins and RNAs in cells and tissues, it has not yet been applied in fungi, mainly due to their complex cell wall. Here we developed a method that enables reliable isotropic expansion of ascomycetes and basidiomycetes upon treatment with cell wall degrading enzymes. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (SIM) images of 4.5-fold expanded sporidia of Ustilago maydis expressing fluorescent fungal rhodopsins and hyphae of Fusarium oxysporum or Aspergillus fumigatus expressing either histone H1-mCherry together with Lifeact-sGFP or mRFP targeted to mitochondria, revealed details of subcellular structures with an estimated spatial resolution of around 30 nm. ExM is thus well suited for cell biology studies in fungi on conventional fluorescence microscopes.}, language = {en} } @article{MartensPanzervandenWijngaardetal.2020, author = {Martens, Johannes and Panzer, Sabine and van den Wijngaard, Jeroen and Siebes, Maria and Schreiber, Laura M.}, title = {Influence of contrast agent dispersion on bolus-based MRI myocardial perfusion measurements: A computational fluid dynamics study}, series = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine}, volume = {84}, journal = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1002/mrm.28125}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-208698}, pages = {467-483}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Purpose: Bolus-based dynamic contrast agent (CA) perfusion measurements of the heart are subject to systematic errors due to CA bolus dispersion in the coronary arteries. To better understand these effects on quantification of myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), an in-silico model of the coronary arteries down to the pre-arteriolar vessels has been developed. Methods: In this work, a computational fluid dynamics analysis is performed to investigate these errors on the basis of realistic 3D models of the left and right porcine coronary artery trees, including vessels at the pre-arteriolar level. Using advanced boundary conditions, simulations of blood flow and CA transport are conducted at rest and under stress. These are evaluated with regard to dispersion (assessed by the width of CA concentration time curves and associated vascular transport functions) and errors of myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve quantification. Results: Contrast agent dispersion increases with traveled distance as well as vessel diameter, and decreases with higher flow velocities. Overall, the average myocardial blood flow errors are -28\% ± 16\% and -8.5\% ± 3.3\% at rest and stress, respectively, and the average myocardial perfusion reserve error is 26\% ± 22\%. The calculated values are different in the left and right coronary tree. Conclusion: Contrast agent dispersion is dependent on a complex interplay of several different factors characterizing the cardiovascular bed, including vessel size and integrated vascular length. Quantification errors evoked by the observed CA dispersion show nonnegligible distortion in dynamic CA bolus-based perfusion measurements. We expect future improvements of quantitative perfusion measurements to make the systematic errors described here more apparent.}, language = {en} }